e10vq
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the quarter ended: June 27, 2009
Commission File Number: 1-10730
HAEMONETICS CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Massachusetts
|
|
04-2882273 |
(State or other jurisdiction
of incorporation or organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
400 Wood Road, Braintree, MA 02184
(Address of principal executive offices)
Registrants telephone number, including area code: (781) 848-7100
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1.) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) (2.) has been subject to
the filing requirements for at least the past 90 days.
Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data
File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a
non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definition of large accelerated filer,
accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act (Check one):
Large accelerated filer þ |
Accelerated filer o |
Non-accelerated filer o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act.)
Yes o No þ
The number of shares of $.01 par value common stock outstanding as of June 27, 2009:
25,688,383
HAEMONETICS CORPORATION
INDEX
1
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
HAEMONETICS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(Unaudited in thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
|
June 27, |
|
|
June 28, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenues |
|
$ |
154,087 |
|
|
$ |
144,116 |
|
Cost of goods sold |
|
|
71,144 |
|
|
|
71,079 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
82,943 |
|
|
|
73,037 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research, development and engineering |
|
|
6,777 |
|
|
|
5,844 |
|
Selling, general and administrative |
|
|
49,839 |
|
|
|
47,859 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
56,616 |
|
|
|
53,703 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
26,327 |
|
|
|
19,334 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(214 |
) |
|
|
(24 |
) |
Interest income |
|
|
157 |
|
|
|
654 |
|
Other (expense)/income, net |
|
|
(335 |
) |
|
|
375 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before provision for income taxes |
|
|
25,935 |
|
|
|
20,339 |
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
7,862 |
|
|
|
5,998 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
18,073 |
|
|
$ |
14,341 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic income per common share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
0.70 |
|
|
$ |
0.56 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income per common share
assuming dilution |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
0.69 |
|
|
$ |
0.54 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares
outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
25,658 |
|
|
|
25,607 |
|
Diluted |
|
|
26,201 |
|
|
|
26,517 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements
2
HAEMONETICS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 27, 2009 |
|
|
March 28, 2009 |
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
173,822 |
|
|
$ |
156,721 |
|
Accounts receivable, less allowance of $3,033 at
June 27, 2009 and $2,312 at March 28, 2009 |
|
|
114,161 |
|
|
|
113,598 |
|
Inventories, net |
|
|
76,097 |
|
|
|
76,522 |
|
Deferred tax asset, net |
|
|
8,473 |
|
|
|
7,190 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
23,601 |
|
|
|
28,362 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
396,154 |
|
|
|
382,393 |
|
Property, plant and equipment: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land, building and building improvements |
|
|
43,611 |
|
|
|
42,540 |
|
Plant equipment and machinery |
|
|
113,373 |
|
|
|
108,572 |
|
Office equipment and information
technology |
|
|
61,744 |
|
|
|
52,461 |
|
Haemonetics equipment |
|
|
201,924 |
|
|
|
194,290 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total property, plant and equipment |
|
|
420,652 |
|
|
|
397,863 |
|
Less: accumulated depreciation |
|
|
(270,265 |
) |
|
|
(260,056 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net property, plant and equipment |
|
|
150,387 |
|
|
|
137,807 |
|
Other assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other intangibles, less amortization of $27,349 at
June 27, 2009 and $25,508 at March 28, 2009 |
|
|
72,008 |
|
|
|
65,261 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
64,730 |
|
|
|
56,426 |
|
Deferred tax asset, long term |
|
|
3,765 |
|
|
|
3,007 |
|
Other long-term assets |
|
|
4,898 |
|
|
|
4,799 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other assets |
|
|
145,402 |
|
|
|
129,493 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
691,943 |
|
|
$ |
649,693 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS
EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes payable and current maturities of long-term debt |
|
$ |
17,200 |
|
|
$ |
695 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
23,448 |
|
|
|
20,652 |
|
Accrued payroll and related costs |
|
|
21,369 |
|
|
|
30,771 |
|
Accrued income taxes |
|
|
1,788 |
|
|
|
2,833 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
40,247 |
|
|
|
37,912 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
104,052 |
|
|
|
92,863 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt, net of current maturities |
|
|
5,160 |
|
|
|
5,343 |
|
Long-term deferred tax liability |
|
|
5,871 |
|
|
|
3,129 |
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
13,007 |
|
|
|
8,474 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies (Note 13) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.01 par value; Authorized -
150,000,000 shares; Issued and outstanding
25,688,383 shares at June 27, 2009 and 25,622,449
shares at March 28, 2009 |
|
|
257 |
|
|
|
256 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
232,221 |
|
|
|
226,829 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
327,589 |
|
|
|
309,516 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
|
|
3,786 |
|
|
|
3,283 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Stockholders equity |
|
|
563,853 |
|
|
|
539,884 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
691,943 |
|
|
$ |
649,693 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
3
HAEMONETICS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY AND OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(Unaudited in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional |
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
Common Stock |
|
Paid-in |
|
Retained |
|
Comprehensive |
|
Stockholders |
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
Shares |
|
$s |
|
Capital |
|
Earnings |
|
Income / (Loss) |
|
Equity |
|
Income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, March 28, 2009 |
|
|
25,622 |
|
|
$ |
256 |
|
|
$ |
226,829 |
|
|
$ |
309,516 |
|
|
$ |
3,283 |
|
|
$ |
539,884 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee stock purchase plan |
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1,456 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,457 |
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise of stock options
and related tax benefit |
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,157 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,157 |
|
|
|
|
|
Stock Compensation expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,779 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,779 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,073 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,073 |
|
|
|
18,073 |
|
Foreign currency translation
adjustment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,631 |
|
|
|
2,631 |
|
|
|
2,631 |
|
Unrealized loss on hedges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,008 |
) |
|
|
(1,008 |
) |
|
|
(1,008 |
) |
Reclassification of hedge gain to earnings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,120 |
) |
|
|
(1,120 |
) |
|
|
(1,120 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,576 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, June 27, 2009 |
|
|
25,688 |
|
|
$ |
257 |
|
|
$ |
232,221 |
|
|
$ |
327,589 |
|
|
$ |
3,786 |
|
|
$ |
563,853 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
4
HAEMONETICS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 27, |
|
|
June 28, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Cash Flows from Operating Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
18,073 |
|
|
$ |
14,341 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating
activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non cash items: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
10,058 |
|
|
|
7,986 |
|
Stock compensation expense |
|
|
2,779 |
|
|
|
2,367 |
|
Loss on sales of plant, property and equipment |
|
|
99 |
|
|
|
1,352 |
|
Unrealized (gain)/loss from hedging activities |
|
|
(1,519 |
) |
|
|
1,985 |
|
Accretion of interest expense on contingent consideration |
|
|
200 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in operating assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease/(increase) in accounts receivable, net |
|
|
1,222 |
|
|
|
(10,448 |
) |
Decrease/(increase) in inventories |
|
|
625 |
|
|
|
(4,865 |
) |
Decrease/(increase) in prepaid income taxes |
|
|
6,737 |
|
|
|
(639 |
) |
Decrease/(increase) in other assets and other long-term liabilities |
|
|
(3,633 |
) |
|
|
(5,658 |
) |
Tax benefit of exercise of stock options |
|
|
173 |
|
|
|
604 |
|
(Decrease)/increase in accounts payable and accrued expenses |
|
|
(9,108 |
) |
|
|
6,817 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
25,706 |
|
|
|
13,842 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows from Investing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures on property, plant and equipment |
|
|
(21,204 |
) |
|
|
(12,395 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment |
|
|
201 |
|
|
|
2,476 |
|
Acquisition of Neoteric |
|
|
(6,613 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Acquisition of Medicell |
|
|
(307 |
) |
|
|
(2,362 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(27,923 |
) |
|
|
(12,281 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows from Financing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments on long-term real estate mortgage |
|
|
(183 |
) |
|
|
(155 |
) |
Net increase in short-term revolving credit agreements |
|
|
16,505 |
|
|
|
3,178 |
|
Employee stock purchase plan |
|
|
1,457 |
|
|
|
1,396 |
|
Exercise of stock options |
|
|
909 |
|
|
|
4,779 |
|
Excess tax benefit on exercise of stock options |
|
|
156 |
|
|
|
1,282 |
|
Stock repurchase |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(24,945 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by/(used in) financing activities |
|
|
18,844 |
|
|
|
(14,465 |
) |
Effect of exchange rates on cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
474 |
|
|
|
(362 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Increase/(Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents |
|
|
17,101 |
|
|
|
(13,266 |
) |
Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Year |
|
|
156,721 |
|
|
|
133,553 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Period |
|
$ |
173,822 |
|
|
$ |
120,287 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-cash Investing and Financing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transfers from inventory to fixed assets for placements of Haemonetics equipment |
|
$ |
2,024 |
|
|
$ |
993 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental Disclosures of Cash Flow Information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest paid |
|
$ |
130 |
|
|
$ |
139 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes paid |
|
$ |
2,980 |
|
|
$ |
3,923 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements
5
1. BASIS OF PRESENTATION
Our accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) in the United States for interim financial
information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly,
they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by GAAP for complete financial
statements. In the opinion of our management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring
accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. All significant
intercompany transactions have been eliminated. Certain reclassifications were made to prior year
balances to conform with the presentation of the financial statements for the three months ended
June 27, 2009. Operating results for the three month period ended June 27, 2009 are not necessarily
indicative of the results that may be expected for the full fiscal year ending April 3, 2010, or
any other interim period. These unaudited consolidated financial statements should be read in
conjunction with our audited consolidated financial statements and footnotes included in our annual
report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 28, 2009.
Our fiscal year ends on the Saturday closest to the last day of March. Fiscal year 2010 includes 53
weeks with each of the first three quarters having 13 weeks and the fourth quarter having 14 weeks.
Fiscal year 2009 included 52 weeks with all four quarters having 13 weeks.
Revenue Recognition
Our revenue recognition policy is to recognize revenues from product sales, software and services
in accordance with SAB No. 104, Revenue Recognition , EITF 00-21, Revenue Arrangements with
Multiple Deliverables and Statement of Position (SOP) 97-2, Software Revenue Recognition, as
amended. These standards require that revenues are recognized when persuasive evidence of an
arrangement exists, product delivery, including customer acceptance, has occurred or services have
been rendered, the price is fixed or determinable and collectibility is reasonably assured. When
more than one element such as equipment, disposables and services are contained in a single
arrangement, we allocate revenue between the elements based on each elements relative fair value,
provided that each element meets the criteria for treatment as a separate unit of accounting. An
item is considered a separate unit of accounting if it has value to the customer on a stand alone
basis and there is objective and reliable evidence of the fair value of the undelivered items. The
fair value of the undelivered elements is determined by the price charged when the element is sold
separately, or in cases when the item is not sold separately, by using other objective evidence as
defined in EITF 00-21, or vendor specific objective evidenced under SOP 97-2.
Product Revenues
Product sales consist of the sale of our equipment devices and the related disposables used with
these devices. On product sales to end customers, revenue is recognized when both the title and
risk of loss have transferred to the customer as determined by the shipping terms and all
obligations have been completed. Examples of common post delivery obligations are installation and
training. For product sales to distributors, we recognize revenue for both equipment and
disposables upon shipment of these products to our distributors. Our standard contracts with our
distributors state that title to the equipment passes to the distributors at point of shipment to a
distributors location. The distributors are responsible for shipment to the end customer along
with installation, training and acceptance of the equipment by the end customer. All shipments to
distributors are at contract prices and payment is not contingent upon resale of the product.
6
Software SolutionsRevenues
At this time, our software solutions business principally provides support to our plasma and blood
collection customers. Through our Haemonetics Software Solutions unit, we provide information
technology platforms and technical support for donor recruitment, blood and plasma testing
laboratories, and for efficient and compliant operations of blood and plasma collection centers.
For plasma customers, we also provide information technology platforms for managing distribution of
plasma from collection centers to plasma fractionation facilities. Software license revenues are
generally billed periodically, monthly or quarterly and recognized for the period for which the
service is provided. Our software solutions business model includes the provision of services,
including in some instances hosting, technical support, and maintenance, for the payment of
periodic, monthly or quarterly fees. We recognize these fees and charges as earned, typically as
these services are provided during the contract period.
Subsequent Events
The company has evaluated subsequent events through August 5, 2009 (the date the unaudited
financial statements were issued) and has determined that there were no recognized and no
non-recognized events to be disclosed.
2. RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141 (revised 2007), Business Combinations (SFAS
141(R)). In SFAS 141(R), the FASB retained the fundamental requirements of Statement No. 141 to
account for all business combinations using the acquisition method (formerly the purchase method)
and for an acquiring entity to be identified in all business combinations. However, the new
standard requires the acquiring entity in a business combination to recognize all (and only) the
assets acquired and liabilities assumed in the transaction; establishes the acquisition-date fair
value as the measurement objective for all assets acquired and liabilities assumed; and requires
the acquirer to disclose to investors and other users all of the information they need to evaluate
and understand the nature and financial effect of the business combination. SFAS 141(R) is
effective for annual periods beginning on or after December 15, 2008. This statement became
effective for our fiscal year 2010 and its impact is reflected in our financial position and
results of operations for the three months ended June 27, 2009.
In December 2007, the FASB issued FASB No. 160 Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial
Statementsan amendment of ARB No. 51 of which the objective is to improve the relevance,
comparability, and transparency of the financial information that a reporting entity provides in
its consolidated financial statements by establishing accounting and reporting standards by
requiring all entities to report noncontrolling (minority) interests in subsidiaries in the same
wayas equity in the consolidated financial statements. Moreover, Statement 160 eliminates the
diversity that currently exists in accounting for transactions between an entity and noncontrolling
interests by requiring they be treated as equity transactions. FASB No. 160 is effective for annual
periods beginning on or after December 15, 2008. This statement became effective during fiscal year
2010 and did not have an impact on our financial position and results of operations. The companys
recent acquisition of LAttitude Medical Systems, Inc. (Neoteric) was accounted for under SFAS
141(R)see Note 9.
3. EARNINGS PER SHARE (EPS)
The following table provides a reconciliation of the numerators and denominators of the basic and
diluted earnings per share computations, as required by SFAS Statement No. 128, Earnings Per
Share. Basic EPS is computed by dividing net income by weighted average shares outstanding.
Diluted EPS includes the effect of potentially dilutive common shares.
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 27, 2009 |
|
|
June 28, 2008 |
|
|
|
(in thousands, except per share amounts) |
|
Basic EPS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
18,073 |
|
|
$ |
14,341 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares |
|
|
25,658 |
|
|
|
25,607 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic income per share |
|
$ |
0.70 |
|
|
$ |
0.56 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted EPS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
18,073 |
|
|
$ |
14,341 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic weighted average shares |
|
|
25,658 |
|
|
|
25,607 |
|
Net effect of common stock equivalents |
|
|
543 |
|
|
|
910 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted weighted average shares |
|
|
26,201 |
|
|
|
26,517 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted income per share |
|
$ |
0.69 |
|
|
$ |
0.54 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding, assuming dilution, excludes the impact of 1.3 million stock
options for the first quarter of fiscal year 2010 and 0.4 million stock options for the first
quarter of fiscal year 2009 because these securities were anti-dilutive during the noted periods.
4. STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION
Stock-based compensation expense of $2.8 and $2.4 million was recognized for the three months ended
June 27, 2009 and June 28, 2008. The related income tax benefit recognized was $0.8 and $0.7
million for the three months ended June 27, 2009 and June 28, 2008. We recognize stock-based
compensation on a straight line basis.
For a more detailed description of our stock-based compensation plans, see Note 11Capital Stock
to the Companys consolidated financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the year ended March 28, 2009. Our stock-based compensation plans currently consist of stock
options, restricted stock awards, restricted stock units and an employee stock purchase plan.
Options become exercisable in the manner specified by the Compensation Committee of our Board of
Directors. All options, restricted stock awards and restricted stock units granted to employees in
the three months ended June 27, 2009 vest over a four year period of time and the options expire
not more than 7 years from the date of grant.
Cash flows relating to the benefits of tax deductions in excess of compensation cost recognized (in
our reported or proforma results) are reported as a financing cash flow, rather than as an
operating cash flow. This excess tax benefit was $0.2 million and $1.3 million for the three months
ended June 27, 2009 and June 28, 2008, respectively.
A summary of information related to stock options is as follows:
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
Aggregate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Intrinsic |
|
|
|
Shares Options |
|
|
Average Exercise |
|
|
Remaining |
|
|
Value |
|
|
|
Outstanding |
|
|
Price |
|
|
Life (Years) |
|
|
($000s) |
|
Outstanding at March 28, 2009 |
|
|
3,054,724 |
|
|
$ |
42.54 |
|
|
|
4.23 |
|
|
$ |
37,601 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
|
32,845 |
|
|
$ |
55.37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised |
|
|
(32,462 |
) |
|
$ |
28.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(6,716 |
) |
|
$ |
49.75 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at June 27, 2009 |
|
|
3,048,391 |
|
|
$ |
42.82 |
|
|
|
4.03 |
|
|
$ |
43,917 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at June 27, 2009 |
|
|
2,033,800 |
|
|
$ |
38.53 |
|
|
|
3.45 |
|
|
$ |
37,963 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expected to Vest at June 27, 2009 |
|
|
2,826,640 |
|
|
$ |
42.18 |
|
|
|
3.95 |
|
|
$ |
42,512 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The total intrinsic value of options exercised during the three month periods ended June 27, 2009
and June 28, 2008, was $0.9 million and $5.6 million, respectively.
As of June 27, 2009 and June 28, 2008, there was $10.1 million and $12.2 million, respectively, of
total unrecognized compensation cost related to non vested stock options. That cost is expected to
be recognized over a weighted average period of 2.1 years. The total fair value of
shares fully vested during the three months ended June 27, 2009 was $8.0 million and
during the three months ended June 28, 2008 was $14.1 million.
The weighted average fair value for our options granted in the first three months of 2009 and 2008
was $15.94 and $17.32, respectively. The assumptions utilized for option grants during
the periods presented are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
June 27, 2009 |
|
June 28, 2008 |
Stock Options Black-Scholes assumptions (weighted average): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Volatility |
|
|
31.85 |
% |
|
|
28.94 |
% |
Expected life (years) |
|
|
4.9 |
|
|
|
4.9 |
|
Risk-free interest rate |
|
|
1.79 |
% |
|
|
2.97 |
% |
Dividend yield |
|
|
0.00 |
% |
|
|
0.00 |
% |
As of June 27, 2009 and June 28, 2008, there was $0.2 and $0.4 million, respectively, of
total unrecognized compensation cost related to non vested restricted stock awards. That cost is
expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 1.3 years. The total fair
value of restricted stock awards vested was $0.1 million for both the three months ended June 27,
2009 and June 28, 2008.
A summary of information related to restricted stock awards is as follows:
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grant Date Fair |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Value |
|
Nonvested at March 28, 2009 |
|
|
10,956 |
|
|
$ |
50.97 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Released |
|
|
(2,500 |
) |
|
$ |
48.09 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonvested at June 27, 2009 |
|
|
8,456 |
|
|
$ |
51.82 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of June 27, 2009 and June 28, 2008, there was $3.6 and $2.0 million, respectively, of total
unrecognized compensation cost related to non vested restricted stock units. That cost is expected
to be recognized over a weighted average period of 2.9 years. The total fair value of shares fully
vested was $0.0 million for both the three months ended June 27, 2009 and June 28, 2008.
A summary of information related to restricted stock units is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Market Value at |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Grant Date |
|
Nonvested at March 28, 2009 |
|
|
102,302 |
|
|
$ |
53.48 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
|
2,501 |
|
|
$ |
54.09 |
|
Vested |
|
|
(289 |
) |
|
$ |
52.69 |
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(598 |
) |
|
$ |
52.66 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonvested at June 27, 2009 |
|
|
103,916 |
|
|
$ |
53.50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of June 27, 2009, there was $0.2 million of total unrecognized compensation expense, net of
estimated forfeitures, related to the Employee Stock Purchase Plan (ESPP) shares. That cost is
expected to be recognized over the remainder of fiscal year 2009.
During the three months ended June 27, 2009 and June 28, 2008, there were 33,183 and 31,474 shares
purchased under the ESPP, respectively. They were purchased at $43.89 and $44.35 per
share under the ESPP.
5. ACCOUNTING FOR SHIPPING AND HANDLING COSTS
Shipping and handling costs are included in cost of goods sold with the exception of $2.9 million
and $3.1 million for the three month periods ended June 27, 2009 and June 28, 2008, respectively,
that are included in selling, general, and administrative expenses. Freight is classified in cost
of goods sold when the customer is charged for freight and in selling, general and administration
when the customer is not explicitly charged for freight.
6. PRODUCT WARRANTIES
10
We provide a warranty on parts and labor for one year after the sale and installation of each
device. We also warrant our disposables products through their use or expiration. We estimate our
potential warranty expense based on our historical warranty experience, and we periodically assess
the adequacy of our warranty accrual and make adjustments as necessary.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended |
|
|
|
June 27, 2009 |
|
|
June 28, 2008 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warranty accrual as of the beginning of the period |
|
$ |
1,835 |
|
|
$ |
929 |
|
Warranty Provision |
|
|
391 |
|
|
|
535 |
|
Warranty Spending |
|
|
(351 |
) |
|
|
(504 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warranty accrual as of the end of the period |
|
$ |
1,875 |
|
|
$ |
960 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7. COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
Comprehensive income is the total of net income and all other non-owner changes in stockholders
equity. For us, all other non-owner changes are primarily foreign currency translation, the change
in our net minimum pension liability, and the changes in fair value of the effective portion of our
outstanding cash flow hedge contracts.
8. INVENTORIES
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market and include the cost of material, labor and
manufacturing overhead. Cost is determined on the first-in, first-out method.
Inventories consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 27, 2009 |
|
|
March 28, 2009 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Raw materials |
|
$ |
25,367 |
|
|
$ |
23,778 |
|
Work-in-process |
|
|
4,002 |
|
|
|
8,732 |
|
Finished goods |
|
|
46,728 |
|
|
|
44,012 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
76,097 |
|
|
$ |
76,522 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9. GOODWILL, OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS, AND ACQUISITIONS
Goodwill
The change in the carrying amount of our goodwill during the three months ended June 27, 2009 is as
follows (in thousands):
11
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying amount as of March 28, 2009 |
|
$ |
56,426 |
|
LAttitude Medical Systems Inc. (Neoteric) (a) |
|
|
6,979 |
|
Altivation Software Inc. (b) |
|
|
437 |
|
Medicell Ltd. (c) |
|
|
583 |
|
Effect of change in rates used for translation |
|
|
305 |
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying amount as of June 27, 2009 |
|
$ |
64,730 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
A description of the acquisition of LAttitude Medical Systems, Inc. (Neoteric),
which occurred on April 16, 2009, is included later in this footnote. |
|
(b) |
|
See Note 3, Acquisitions, in our fiscal year 2009 Form 10-K for a full description of
the acquisition of Altivation Software (Altivation), which occurred on March 27, 2009. |
|
(c) |
|
See Note 3, Acqusitions, in our fiscal year 2009 Form 10-K for a full description of
the acquisition of Medicell Ltd. (Medicell), which occurred on April 4, 2008. |
Other Intangible Assets
As of June 27, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Carrying Amount |
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
Weighted Average |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
Useful Life (in years) |
|
Patents |
|
$ |
12,039 |
|
|
$ |
5,195 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
Capitalized software |
|
|
20,250 |
|
|
|
661 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
Other technology |
|
|
35,788 |
|
|
|
12,100 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
Customer contracts
and
related relationships |
|
|
30,175 |
|
|
|
9,048 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
Trade names |
|
|
1,105 |
|
|
|
345 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total intangibles |
|
$ |
99,357 |
|
|
$ |
27,349 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of March 28, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross CarryingAmount |
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
Weighted Average |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
Useful Life (in years) |
|
Patents |
|
$ |
12,008 |
|
|
$ |
4,945 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
Capitalized software |
|
|
18,994 |
|
|
|
572 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
Other technology |
|
|
28,784 |
|
|
|
11,501 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
Customer contracts
and
related relationships |
|
|
29,886 |
|
|
|
8,240 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
Trade names |
|
|
1,097 |
|
|
|
250 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total intangibles |
|
$ |
90,769 |
|
|
$ |
25,508 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On April 16, 2009, Haemonetics acquired the outstanding shares of LAttitude Medical Systems Inc.
(Neoteric). Neoteric is a medical information management company that markets a full end-to-end
suite of products to track, allocate, release, and dispense hospital blood units while controlling
inventory and recording
12
the disposition of blood. The acquisition strategically broadened
Haemonetics blood management solutions. The purchase price was $6.7 million plus contingent
consideration.
The contingent consideration is based upon annual revenue growth for the three years following the
acquisition, at established profitability thresholds. Using projected revenues for fiscal years
2010, 2011, and 2012, an analysis was performed that probability weighted three performance
outcomes for the noted years. The performance outcomes were then discounted using a discount rate
commensurate with the risks associated with Neoteric to arrive at a recorded $5.0 million fair
value for the contingent consideration. The contingent consideration is based upon future operating
performance and is not contractually limited.
The purchase price premium was recorded as goodwill of $7.0 million, other intangibles of $7.1
million, and deferred tax liabilities of $2.3 million. The purchase price allocation will be
finalized no later than one year from the acquisition date. The results of the Neoteric operations
are included in our consolidated results for periods after the acquisition.
In addition to the Neoteric acquisition discussed above, changes to the net carrying value of our
intangible assets from March 28, 2009 to June 27, 2009, reflect the capitalization of software
costs associated with our devices and software products (see Note 16), amortization expense and the
effect of exchange rate changes in the translation of our intangible assets held by our
international subsidiaries.
Amortization expense for amortized intangible assets was $1.6 million and $1.5 million for the
three months ended June 27, 2009 and June 28, 2008, respectively. Annual amortization expense is
expected to approximate $7.7 million for fiscal year 2010, $7.5 million for fiscal year 2011, $7.1
million for fiscal year 2012, $7.0 million for fiscal year 2013, and $7.6 million for fiscal year
2014.
10. DERIVATIVES AND FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
We manufacture, market and sell our products globally. Approximately 51% of our sales are generated
outside the U.S. in local currencies. We also incur certain manufacturing, marketing and selling
costs in international markets in local currency. Accordingly, our earnings and cash flows are
exposed to market risk from changes in foreign currency exchange rates relative to the U.S. dollar,
our reporting currency.
We have a program in place that is designed to mitigate our exposure to changes in foreign currency
exchange rates. That program includes the use of derivative financial instruments to minimize for a
period of time, the unforeseen impact on our financial results from changes in foreign exchange
rates. We utilize forward foreign currency contracts to hedge the anticipated cash flows from
transactions denominated in foreign currencies, primarily the Japanese Yen and the Euro, and to
lesser extent the Great British Pound Sterling and the Canadian Dollar. This does not eliminate the
volatility of foreign exchange rates, but because we generally enter into
forward contracts one year out, rates are fixed for a one-year period, thereby facilitating
financial planning and resource allocation.
Designated Foreign Currency Hedge Contracts
All of our designated foreign currency hedge contracts as of June 27, 2009 and March 28, 2009 were
cash flow hedges under Statement No. 133. We record the effective portion of any change in the fair
value of designated foreign currency hedge contracts in other comprehensive income (OCI) in the
Statement of Stockholders Equity until the related third-party transaction occurs. Once the
related third-party transaction occurs, we reclassify the effective portion of any related gain or
loss on the designated foreign currency hedge contracts to earnings. In the event the hedged
forecasted transaction does not occur, or it becomes probable that it will not occur, we would
reclassify the amount of any gain or loss on the related cash flow hedge to earnings at that time.
We had
13
designated foreign currency hedge contracts outstanding in the contract amount of $133.3
million as of June 27, 2009 and $117.1 million as of March 28, 2009.
During the first quarter of fiscal year 2010, we recognized net gains of $1.1 million in earnings
on our cash flow hedges. All currency cash flow hedges outstanding as of June 27, 2009 mature
within twelve months. For the quarter ended June 27, 2009, $1.0 million of losses, net of tax, were
recorded in OCI to recognize the effective portion of the fair value of any designated foreign
currency hedge contracts that are, or previously were, designated as foreign currency cash flow
hedges, as compared to net gains of $2.9 million as of June 28, 2008. For the quarter ended June
27, 2009, $1.0 million of losses, net of tax, may be reclassified to earnings within the next
twelve months.
Non-designated Foreign Currency Contracts
We manage our exposure to changes in foreign currency on a consolidated basis to take advantage of
offsetting transactions and balances. We use currency forward contracts as a part of our strategy
to manage exposure related to foreign currency denominated monetary assets and liabilities. These
currency forward contracts are not designated as cash flow or fair value hedges under Statement No.
133. These forward contracts are marked-to-market with changes in fair value recorded to earnings;
and are entered into for periods consistent with currency transaction exposures, generally one
month. We had currency designated foreign currency hedge contracts under Statement No. 133
outstanding in the contract amount of $41.4 million as of June 27, 2009 and $51.6 million as of
March 28, 2009.
Fair Value of Derivative Instruments
The following table present the effect of our derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges
and those not designated as hedging instruments under Statement No. 133 in our consolidated
statement of income for the three months ended June 27, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of |
|
|
Reclassified |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss |
|
|
OCI into from |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recognized in |
|
|
Earnings |
|
|
Location in |
|
|
Excluded from |
|
|
Location in |
|
|
|
OCI (Effective |
|
|
(Effective |
|
|
Statement of |
|
|
Effectiveness |
|
|
Statement of |
|
Derivative Instruments |
|
Portion) |
|
|
Portion) |
|
|
Operations |
|
|
Testing (*) |
|
|
Operations |
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Designated foreign currency hedge contracts |
|
$ |
(1,008 |
) |
|
$ |
1,120 |
|
|
Net revenues |
|
$ |
260 |
|
|
Other income |
Non-designated foreign currency hedge
contracts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(394 |
) |
|
Other expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(1,008 |
) |
|
$ |
1,120 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(134 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(*) |
|
We exclude the difference between the spot rate and hedge rate from our effectiveness testing. |
We did not have fair value hedges or net investment hedges outstanding as of June 27, 2009 or March
28, 2009.
Statement No. 133 requires all derivative instruments to be recognized at their fair values as
either assets or liabilities on the balance sheet. We determine the fair value of our derivative
instruments using the framework prescribed by FASB Statement No. 157, Fair Value Measurements, by
considering the estimated amount we
14
would receive or pay to sell or transfer these instruments at
the reporting date and by taking into account current interest rates, currency exchange rates, the
creditworthiness of the counterparty for assets, and our creditworthiness for liabilities. In
certain instances, we may utilize financial models to measure fair value. Generally, we use inputs
that include quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for
identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active; other observable inputs
for the asset or liability; and inputs derived principally from, or corroborated by, observable
market data by correlation or other means. As of June 27, 2009, we have classified our derivative
assets and liabilities within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy prescribed by Statement No. 157,
as discussed below, because these observable inputs are available for substantially the full term
of our derivative instruments.
The following tables present the fair value of our derivative instruments as they appear in our
consolidated balance sheets as of June 27, 2009 by type of contract and whether it is a qualifying
hedge under Statement No. 133.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Location in |
|
Balance as of |
|
Balance as of |
(in thousands) |
|
Balance Sheet |
|
June 27, 2009 |
|
March 28, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Designated foreign currency hedge contracts |
|
Other current assets |
|
$ |
2,753 |
|
|
$ |
3,936 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,753 |
|
|
$ |
3,936 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Designated foreign currency hedge contracts |
|
Other accrued liabilities |
|
$ |
4,417 |
|
|
$ |
2,914 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
4,417 |
|
|
$ |
2,914 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Fair Value Measurements
We adopted Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Statement No. 157, Fair Value Measurements,
as of March 30, 2008. Statement No. 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring
fair value in accordance with U.S. GAAP, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements.
Statement No. 157 does not
require any new fair value measurements; rather, it applies to other accounting pronouncements that
require or permit fair value measurements. In accordance with Staff Position No. 157-2, for the
three months ended June 27, 2009, we applied Statement No. 157 to our nonfinancial assets and
nonfinancial liabilities. As we did not have an impairment of any nonfinancial assets or
nonfinancial liabilities, there was no disclosure required relating to our nonfinancial assets or
nonfinancial liabilities.
On a recurring basis, we measure certain financial assets and financial liabilities at fair value,
including our money market funds, foreign currency derivative contracts, and contingent
consideration. Statement No. 157 defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an
asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the
measurement date. As such, fair value is a market-based measurement that should be determined based
on assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability. We base fair
value upon quoted market prices, where available. Where quoted market prices or other observable
inputs are not available, we apply valuation techniques to estimate fair value.
Statement No. 157 establishes a three-level valuation hierarchy for disclosure of fair value
measurements. The categorization of assets and liabilities within the valuation hierarchy is based
upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the measurement of fair value. The three
levels of the hierarchy are defined as follows:
|
|
|
Level 1 Inputs to the valuation methodology are quoted market prices for identical
assets or liabilities. |
15
|
|
|
Level 2 Inputs to the valuation methodology are other observable inputs, including
quoted market prices for similar assets or liabilities and market-corroborated inputs. |
|
|
|
|
Level 3 Inputs to the valuation methodology are unobservable inputs based on
managements best estimate of inputs market participants would use in pricing the asset or
liability at the measurement date, including assumptions about risk. |
Our money market funds carried at fair value are generally classified within Level 1 of the fair
value hierarchy because they are valued using quoted market prices.
We recognize all derivative financial instruments in our consolidated financial statements at fair
value in accordance with FASB Statement No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activities. We determine the fair value of these instruments using the framework prescribed by
Statement No. 157 by considering the estimated amount we would receive or pay to terminate these
agreements at the reporting date and by taking into account current spot rates, the
creditworthiness of the counterparty for assets, and our creditworthiness for liabilities. We have
classified our foreign currency hedge contracts within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy because
these observable inputs are available for substantially the full term of our derivative
instruments. For the quarter ended June 27, 2009, we have classified our other liabilities
contingent consideration relating to our acquisition of Neoteric within Level 3 of the fair value
hierarchy because the value is determine using significant unobservable inputs.
Fair Value Measured on a Recurring Basis
Financial assets and financial liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis consist of
the following as of June 27, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Significant |
|
|
|
|
Quoted Market Prices |
|
Significant Other |
|
Unobservable |
|
|
|
|
for Identical Assets |
|
Observable Inputs |
|
Inputs |
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
(Level 1) |
|
(Level 2) |
|
(Level 3) |
|
Total |
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Money market funds |
|
$ |
150,950 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
150,950 |
|
Forward currency exchange contracts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,753 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,753 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
150,950 |
|
|
$ |
2,753 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
153,703 |
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forward currency exchange contracts |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
4,417 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
4,417 |
|
Other liabilities contingent
consideration |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,188 |
|
|
|
5,188 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
4,417 |
|
|
$ |
5,188 |
|
|
$ |
9,605 |
|
|
|
|
A description of the methods used to determine the fair value of the Level 3 liabilities (other
liabilities contingent consideration) is included within Note 9 Goodwill, Other Intangible
Assets, and Acquisitions. The table below provides a reconcialiation of the beginning and ending
Level 3 liabilities for the quarter ended June 27, 2009.
16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements |
|
|
|
Using Significant |
|
|
|
Unobservable Inputs |
|
(in thousands) |
|
(Level 3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning balance |
|
$ |
|
|
Transfers into Level 3 |
|
|
4,988 |
|
Change in value |
|
|
200 |
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance |
|
$ |
5,188 |
|
|
|
|
|
Statement No. 159
In February 2007, the FASB issued Statement No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and
Financial Liabilities, including an amendment of FASB Statement No. 115, which allows an entity to
elect to record financial assets and financial liabilities at fair value upon their initial
recognition on a contract-by-contract basis. We adopted Statement No. 159 as of March 30, 2008 and
did not elect the fair value option for our eligible financial assets and financial liabilities.
Other Fair Value Disclosures
The fair value of our long-term debt obligations was $5.2 million and $5.9 million at June 27, 2009
and June 28, 2008, respectively.
11. INCOME TAXES
Our reported tax rate includes two principal components: an expected effective annual tax rate and
discrete items resulting in additional provisions or benefits that are recorded in the quarter that
an event arises. Events or items
that give rise to discrete recognition include finalizing audit examinations for open tax years, a
statute of limitations expiration, or a stock acquisition.
The reported tax rate was 30.3% for the three month period ended June 27, 2009. The reported tax
rate includes:
|
|
A 31.1% expected effective annual tax rate which reflects tax benefits from foreign taxes
(including our Swiss principal) and a domestic manufacturing deduction, offset in part by the
state tax provision, and stock compensation expenses not deductible in all jurisdictions; and |
|
|
A $0.7 million benefit (on an annual basis) from the remittance of Japanese earnings. |
The reported tax rate was 29.5% for the three month period ended June 28, 2008. The reported tax
rate includes:
|
|
A 35.1% expected effective annual tax rate which reflects tax benefits from foreign taxes and
stock compensation expenses that are not deductible in all jurisdictions and a domestic
manufacturing deduction, offset in part by the state tax provision, and stock compensation
expenses not deductible in all jurisdictions; and |
17
|
|
A $1.1 million reversal of previously accrued income taxes because of the expiration of
foreign statute of limitations. |
We conduct business globally and, as a result, file we consolidated federal, consolidated and
separate state and foreign income tax returns in multiple jurisdictions. In the normal course of
business, we are subject to examination by taxing authorities throughout the world in jurisdictions
including the U.S., Japan, Germany, France, the United Kingdom, and Switzerland. With few
exceptions, we are no longer subject to U.S. federal, state and local, or foreign income tax
examinations for years before 2006.
12. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
We are presently engaged in various legal actions, and although ultimate liability cannot be
determined at the present time, we believe, based on consultation with counsel, that any such
liability will not materially affect our consolidated financial position or our results of
operations.
13. DEFINED BENEFIT PENSION PLANS
Certain of the Companys foreign subsidiaries have defined benefit pension plans covering
substantially all full time employees at those subsidiaries. Net periodic benefit costs for the
plans in the aggregate include the following components:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended |
|
|
|
June 27, 2009 |
|
|
June 28, 2008 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Service Cost |
|
$ |
124 |
|
|
$ |
150 |
|
Interest cost on benefit obligation |
|
|
61 |
|
|
|
66 |
|
Expected return on plan assets |
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
(19 |
) |
Amortization of unrecognized prior
service cost, unrecognized gain and
unrecognized initial obligation |
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic benefit cost |
|
$ |
160 |
|
|
$ |
193 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14. SEGMENT INFORMATION
Segment Definition Criteria
We manage our business on the basis of one operating segment: the design, manufacture and marketing
of automated blood processing systems. Our chief operating decision-maker uses consolidated results
to make operating and strategic decisions. Manufacturing processes, as well as the regulatory
environment in which we operate, are largely the same for all product lines.
Enterprise Wide Disclosures about Product and Services
We have three families of products: (1) disposables, (2) software solutions and (3) equipment &
other.
Disposables include the plasma, blood bank, and hospital product lines. Plasma consists of the
disposables used to perform apheresis for the separation of whole blood components and subsequent
collection of plasma. Blood bank consists of platelet and red cell disposables. Hospital consists
of surgical disposables (principally the Cell Saver® and cardioPAT® disposable products), OrthoPAT®
disposables, and diagnostics products (principally the TEG® products).
18
Software solutions include information technology platforms that assist blood banks, plasma
centers, and hospitals more effectively manage regulatory compliance and operational efficiency.
Equipment & other revenues include revenue from equipment sales, repairs performed under preventive
maintenance contracts or emergency service visits, spare part sales, and various service and
training programs.
Revenues from External Customers:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 27, 2009 |
|
|
June 28, 2008 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disposable revenues by product family
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plasma disposables |
|
$ |
58,869 |
|
|
$ |
46,868 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Blood bank disposables |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Platelet |
|
$ |
34,307 |
|
|
$ |
35,659 |
|
Red cell |
|
$ |
11,779 |
|
|
$ |
11,842 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
46,086 |
|
|
$ |
47,501 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hospital disposables |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Surgical |
|
$ |
17,425 |
|
|
$ |
17,269 |
|
OrthoPAT |
|
$ |
8,584 |
|
|
$ |
8,796 |
|
Diagnostics |
|
$ |
4,997 |
|
|
$ |
5,094 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
31,006 |
|
|
$ |
31,159 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disposables revenue |
|
$ |
135,961 |
|
|
$ |
125,528 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Software solutions |
|
$ |
8,454 |
|
|
$ |
7,258 |
|
Equipment & other |
|
$ |
9,672 |
|
|
$ |
11,330 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
$ |
154,087 |
|
|
$ |
144,116 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15. REORGANIZATION
During the last two years, the Company has transformed aspects of its international businesses, and
more recently, its U.S. domestic Technical Operations organizations. The following summarizes the
restructuring activity for the three months ended June 27, 2009 and June 28, 2008, respectively:
19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 27, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring |
|
|
|
Balance at |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrual Balance at |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
March 28, 2009 |
|
|
Cost Incurred |
|
|
Payments |
|
|
Asset Write down |
|
|
June 27, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee-related costs |
|
$ |
2,730 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(483 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2,247 |
|
Facility related costs |
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
42 |
|
Other Exit &
Termination Costs |
|
|
78 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
78 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,850 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(483 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2,367 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 28, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring |
|
|
|
Balance at |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset Write |
|
|
Accrual Balance at |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
March 31, 2008 |
|
|
Cost Incurred |
|
|
Payments |
|
|
down |
|
|
June 28, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee-related costs |
|
$ |
521 |
|
|
$ |
1,668 |
|
|
$ |
(1,299 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
890 |
|
Facility related costs |
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
42 |
|
Other Exit &
Termination Costs |
|
|
78 |
|
|
|
72 |
|
|
|
(72 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
78 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
641 |
|
|
$ |
1,740 |
|
|
$ |
(1,371 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16. CAPITALIZATION OF SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT COSTS
The Company is implementing an Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) system. In fiscal year 2007, we
began our plan to implement the system in three phases over three years.
The cost of software that is developed or obtained for internal use is accounted for pursuant to
AICPA Statement of Position 98-1, Accounting for the Costs of Computer Software Developed or
Obtained for Internal Use (SOP 98-1). Pursuant to SOP 98-1, the Company capitalizes costs
incurred during the application development stage of software developed for internal use, and
expenses costs incurred during the preliminary project and the post-implementation operation stages
of development. The Company capitalized $4.2 million and $0.4 million, respectively, during the
three month periods ended June 27, 2009 and June 28, 2008, in costs incurred for acquisition of the
software license and related software development costs for new internal software that was in the
application development stage. The total capitalized costs incurred to date include $1.8 million
for the cost of the software license and $25.5 million in third party development costs and
internal personnel costs.
In connection with the development of the software for our next generation Donor apheresis
platform, the Company capitalized $0.0 million and $0.7 million in software development costs
during the three month periods ended June 27, 2009 and June 28, 2008, respectively, in accordance
with SFAS No. 86, Accounting for the Cost
of Computer Software to be Sold, Leased, or Otherwise Marketed. Since the start of the project, a
total of $12.0 million in total software development costs has been capitalized in connection with
the next generation Donor apheresis platform. All costs capitalized were incurred after a detailed
design of the software was developed and research and development activities on the underlying
device were completed. Work on the Donor apheresis platform has been temporarily suspended while
the Company focuses on completing another project, which is expected to be completed during fiscal
year 2010. Work on the Donor apheresis platform is expected to resume during fiscal year 2010. We
will begin to amortize these costs when the device is released for sale.
20
Additionally, the Company capitalized $1.3 million and $0.7 million in other software development
costs for ongoing initiatives during the three-month periods ended June 27, 2009 and June 28, 2008,
respectively. At June 27, 2009, we have a total of $7.2 million of costs capitalized related to
other in process software development initiatives. We will begin to amortize these costs when the
products are released for sale.
21
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
This Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (MD&A)
should be read in conjunction with both our interim consolidated financial statements and notes
thereto which appear elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and our annual consolidated
financial statements, notes thereto, and the MD&A contained in our fiscal year 2009 Annual Report
on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC) on May 22, 2009. The
following discussion may contain forward-looking statements and should be read in conjunction with
the Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Information beginning on page 40.
Our Business
Haemonetics is a blood management solutions company for our customers. Anchored by our reputable
medical device systems, we also provide information technology platforms and value added services
to provide customers with business solutions which support improved clinical outcomes for patients
and efficiency in the blood supply chain.
Our systems automate the collection and processing of donated blood; assess likelihood for blood
loss; and salvage and process surgical patient blood. These systems include devices and single-use,
proprietary disposable sets (disposables) that operate only with our specialized devices. Our
systems allow users to collect and process only the blood component(s) they target plasma,
platelets, or red blood cells increasing donor and patient safety as well as collection
efficiencies. Our information technology platforms are used by blood and plasma collectors to
improve the safety and efficiency of blood collection logistics by eliminating previously manual
functions at not-for-profit blood banks and commercial plasma centers. Our business services
products include consulting, Six Sigma, LEAN manufacturing and Insight Opportunity Model offerings
that support our customers needs for regulatory compliance and operational efficiency in the blood
supply chain.
We either sell our devices to customers (resulting in equipment revenue) or place our devices with
customers subject to certain conditions. When the device remains our property, the customer has the
right to use it for a period of time as long as the customer meets certain conditions we have
established, which among other things, generally include one or more of the following:
|
|
|
Purchase and consumption of a minimum level of disposables products; |
|
|
|
|
Payment of monthly rental fees; and |
|
|
|
|
An asset utilization performance metric, such as performing a minimum level of
procedures per month per device. |
Our disposables revenue stream (including sales of disposables and fees for the use of our
equipment) accounted for approximately 88% and 87% of our total revenues for the first quarter of
fiscal year 2010 and 2009, respectively.
22
Financial Summary
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands, except |
|
For the three months ended |
|
Percentage |
per share data) |
|
June 27, 2009 |
|
June 28, 2008 |
|
Increase/(Decrease) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenues |
|
$ |
154,087 |
|
|
$ |
144,116 |
|
|
|
6.9 |
% |
Gross profit |
|
$ |
82,943 |
|
|
$ |
73,037 |
|
|
|
13.6 |
% |
% of net revenues |
|
|
53.8 |
% |
|
|
50.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses |
|
$ |
56,616 |
|
|
$ |
53,703 |
|
|
|
5.4 |
% |
Operating income |
|
$ |
26,327 |
|
|
$ |
19,334 |
|
|
|
36.2 |
% |
% of net revenues |
|
|
17.1 |
% |
|
|
13.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
($214 |
) |
|
|
($24 |
) |
|
|
791.7 |
% |
Interest income |
|
$ |
157 |
|
|
$ |
654 |
|
|
|
(76.0 |
%) |
Other income, net |
|
|
($335 |
) |
|
$ |
375 |
|
|
|
(189.3 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before taxes |
|
$ |
25,935 |
|
|
$ |
20,339 |
|
|
|
27.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for income tax |
|
$ |
7,862 |
|
|
$ |
5,998 |
|
|
|
31.1 |
% |
% of pre-tax income |
|
|
30.3 |
% |
|
|
29.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
18,073 |
|
|
$ |
14,341 |
|
|
|
26.0 |
% |
% of net revenues |
|
|
11.7 |
% |
|
|
10.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per
share-diluted |
|
$ |
0.69 |
|
|
$ |
0.54 |
|
|
|
27.5 |
% |
Net revenues increased 6.9% for the first quarter of fiscal year 2010 over the comparable period of
fiscal year 2009. The effects of foreign exchange accounted for an increase of 0.7% for the first
quarter. The remaining increase of 6.2% for the quarter is mainly due to increases in our plasma
disposables revenue and software solutions revenue.
Gross profit increased 13.6% as compared to the first quarter of fiscal year 2009. The favorable
effects of foreign exchange accounted for an increase of 8.2% for the quarter. The remaining
increase of 5.4% for the quarter was due primarily to increased sales and manufacturing
efficiencies. This was partly offset by changes in product mix driven by higher sales of our lower
margin plasma products.
Operating expenses increased 5.4% for the first quarter of fiscal year 2010 over the comparable
period of fiscal year 2009. The favorable effects of foreign exchange accounted for a decrease in
operating expenses of 2.9% for the quarter. Without the effects of foreign exchange operating
expenses increased 8.3% for the quarter. The higher operating expenses are primarily related to
increased investment in research and development, the expenses from recent acquisitions, expenses
associated with our ERP Phase II go-live, and higher expenses due to increased
23
sales. The noted
increases in operating expenses were partly offset by a lack of restructuring costs in the first
quarter of fiscal year 2010.
Operating income increased 36.2% for the first quarter of fiscal year 2010 over the comparable
period of fiscal year 2009. The favorable effects of foreign exchange accounted for an increase of
operating income of 37.7% for the quarter. Without the effects of foreign exchange operating income
decreased 1.5% for the quarter as a result of noted changes in gross profit and operating expenses.
Net income increased 26.0% for the first quarter of fiscal year 2010 over the comparable period of
fiscal year 2009. The main factor that affected net income was the increase in operating income,
partially offset by increased interest expense and other expense.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Net Revenues by Geography
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended |
|
Percentage |
(in thousands) |
|
June 27, 2009 |
|
June 28, 2008 |
|
Increase |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States |
|
$ |
75,013 |
|
|
$ |
65,789 |
|
|
|
14.0 |
% |
International |
|
|
79,074 |
|
|
|
78,327 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
% |
|
|
|
Net revenues |
|
$ |
154,087 |
|
|
$ |
144,116 |
|
|
|
6.9 |
% |
|
|
|
International Operations and the Impact of Foreign Exchange
Our principal operations are in the U.S., Europe, Japan and other parts of Asia. Our products are
marketed in more than 80 countries around the world via a direct sales force as well as independent
distributors and agents.
Our revenues generated outside the U.S. approximated 51% and 54% of total sales for the first
quarter of fiscal years 2010 and 2009, respectively. Revenues in Japan accounted for approximately
16% and 15% of total revenues for the first quarter of fiscal year 2010 and 2009, respectively.
Revenues in Europe accounted for approximately 28% and 31% of total revenues for the first quarter
of fiscal year 2010 and 2009, respectively. International sales are primarily conducted in local
currencies, primarily the Japanese Yen and the Euro. As discussed above, our results of operations
can be impacted by changes in the value of the Yen and the Euro relative to the U.S. dollar.
Please see section entitled Foreign Exchange in this discussion for a more complete explanation
of how foreign currency affects our business and our strategy for managing this exposure.
24
Net Revenues by Product Type
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended |
|
Percentage |
(in thousands) |
|
June 27, 2009 |
|
June 28, 2008 |
|
Increase/(Decrease) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disposables |
|
$ |
135,961 |
|
|
$ |
125,528 |
|
|
|
8.3 |
% |
Software solutions |
|
|
8,454 |
|
|
|
7,258 |
|
|
|
16.5 |
% |
Equipment & other |
|
|
9,672 |
|
|
|
11,330 |
|
|
|
(14.6 |
%) |
|
|
|
Net revenues |
|
$ |
154,087 |
|
|
$ |
144,116 |
|
|
|
6.9 |
% |
|
|
|
Disposables Revenues by Product Type
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended |
|
|
Percentage |
|
(in thousands) |
|
June 27, 2009 |
|
|
June 28, 2008 |
|
|
Increase/(Decrease) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plasma disposables |
|
$ |
58,869 |
|
|
$ |
46,868 |
|
|
|
25.6 |
% |
Blood bank disposables |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Platelet |
|
$ |
34,307 |
|
|
$ |
35,659 |
|
|
|
(3.8 |
%) |
Red cell |
|
$ |
11,779 |
|
|
$ |
11,842 |
|
|
|
(0.5 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
46,086 |
|
|
$ |
47,501 |
|
|
|
(3.0 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hospital disposables |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Surgical |
|
$ |
17,425 |
|
|
$ |
17,269 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
% |
OrthoPAT |
|
$ |
8,584 |
|
|
$ |
8,796 |
|
|
|
(2.4 |
%) |
Diagnostics |
|
$ |
4,997 |
|
|
$ |
5,094 |
|
|
|
(1.9 |
%) |
|
|
$ |
31,006 |
|
|
$ |
31,159 |
|
|
|
(0.5 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total disposables
revenue |
|
$ |
135,961 |
|
|
$ |
125,528 |
|
|
|
8.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DISPOSABLES
Disposables include the Plasma, Blood Bank, and Hospital product lines. Disposables revenue
increased 8.3% for the first quarter of fiscal year 2010 compared to the first quarter of fiscal
year 2009. Foreign exchange resulted in a 0.7% increase for the first quarter over the comparable
period in fiscal year 2009. The remaining increase of 7.6% for the quarter was driven by increases
in the Plasma product line, as discussed below.
Plasma
Plasma disposables revenue increased 25.6% for the first quarter of fiscal year 2010 compared to
the same period in fiscal year 2009. Foreign exchange resulted in a 0.3% increase for the first
quarter over the comparable period in fiscal year 2009. The remaining 25.3% increase was driven by
higher collections in both the US and Europe, share gains, and, to a lesser extent, pricing.
25
As supply-demand balance has been achieved between source plasma collected and used in
pharmaceutical production, we are beginning to see a moderation in collections. The fractionation
companies will balance collections to support the underlying growth in demand for plasma drugs
which we believe to be in the 7% range. With contractual price increases, new products, and market
share gains, we anticipate that plasma disposable revenue growth will continue to outpace
collection market growth in the near term and moderate to a low to mid double-digit rate over the
next eighteen months.
Blood Bank
Blood bank consists of platelet and red cell disposables.
Platelet disposables revenue decreased 3.8% for the first quarter of fiscal year 2010 compared to
the same period in fiscal year 2009. Comparing the first quarter of fiscal year 2010 to that of
2009, foreign exchange accounted for an increase of 1.9%. Without the effect of currency, the
decrease of 5.7% was the result of challenges in South Korea associated with the significant
devaluation of South Koreas currency, the Won, and share loss in Japan.
Red Cell disposables revenue decreased 0.5% compared to the first quarter of fiscal year 2009.
Foreign exchange accounted for an decrease of 0.3% in the quarter over the comparable period in
fiscal year 2009. The remaining decrease of 0.2% was driven by lower demand for automated
collections, as a result of (i) fewer elective surgeries, thus a reduced demand for blood and (ii)
5% more donors due to the entry of 16 year olds to the blood donor population.
Hospital
Hospital consists of surgical, OrthoPAT, and diagnostics products.
Revenues from our surgical disposables increased 0.9% for the first quarter of fiscal year 2010 as
compared to the first quarter of fiscal year 2009. Surgical disposables revenue consists
principally of the Cell Saver and cardioPAT products. Foreign exchange resulted in a 2.3% increase
in surgical disposables revenue during the quarter. Without the effect of currency, surgical
disposables decreased 1.4% for the quarter. The decrease was primarily the result of decreased
sales of Cell Saver products partially offset by increases in sales of cardioPAT products.
Revenues from our OrthoPAT disposables decreased 2.4% for the first quarter of fiscal year 2010 as
compared to the first quarter of fiscal year 2009. Foreign exchange resulted in a 0.4% decrease in
OrthoPAT disposables revenue during the quarter. Without foreign exchange, revenues decreased by
2.0% for the quarter. The decrease was primarily the result of a decline in the number of
orthopedic procedures.
Revenues from our diagnostics products decreased 1.9% for the first quarter of fiscal year 2010 as
compared to the first quarter of fiscal year 2009. Diagnostics product revenue consists principally
of the TEG products. Foreign exchange resulted in a 2.9% decrease in diagnostic product revenue
during the quarter. Without the effect of currency, diagnostic product increased 1.0% for the
quarter. The growth was the result of increased TEG disposables revenue mostly offset by a decline
in TEG equipment sales.
SOFTWARE SOLUTIONS
Our software solutions revenues include revenue from software sales. Software solutions revenues
increased 16.5% as compared to the first quarter of fiscal year 2009. Foreign exchange resulted in
a 0.9% increase in software solutions revenue during the quarter. The remaining increase of 15.6%
was driven by increased sales to commercial plasma customers and revenues associated with two
recent acquisitions.
26
EQUIPMENT & OTHER
Our equipment & other revenues include revenue from equipment sales, repairs performed under
preventive maintenance contracts or emergency service visits, spare part sales, and various service
and training programs. Equipment & other revenues decreased 14.6% for the first quarter of fiscal year 2010 as compared to
the first quarter of fiscal year 2009. Foreign exchange resulted in a 1.4% increase in revenue
during the quarter. The remaining decrease of 16.0% is primarily the result of fewer equipment
sales, particularly to our hospital customers as hospitals are resisting even modest capital
purchases in the current economic environment.
Gross Profit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended |
|
Percentage |
(in thousands) |
|
June 27, 2009 |
|
June 28, 2008 |
|
Increase |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
$ |
82,943 |
|
|
$ |
73,037 |
|
|
|
13.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of net revenues |
|
|
53.8 |
% |
|
|
50.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Gross profit increased 13.6% as compared to the first quarter of fiscal year 2009. Foreign exchange
resulted in a 8.2% increase for the first quarter of fiscal year 2010. The remaining increase of
5.4% for the quarter was due primarily to the increase in net revenues and fixed cost leverage. Our
gross profit margin improved 310 basis points compared to the first quarter of fiscal year 2009.
The improvement was attributable to foreign exchange and improved manufacturing efficiencies,
particularly for our plasma business. Product mix partly offset these improvements due to increased
sales of our lower margin plasma products.
Operating Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended |
|
Percentage |
(in thousands) |
|
June 27, 2009 |
|
June 28, 2008 |
|
Increase |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research, development
and engineering |
|
$ |
6,777 |
|
|
$ |
5,844 |
|
|
|
16.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of net revenues |
|
|
4.4 |
% |
|
|
4.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and
administrative |
|
$ |
49,839 |
|
|
$ |
47,859 |
|
|
|
4.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of net revenues |
|
|
32.3 |
% |
|
|
33.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
$ |
56,616 |
|
|
$ |
53,703 |
|
|
|
|
|
% of net revenues |
|
|
36.7 |
% |
|
|
37.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
27
Research, Development and Engineering
Research, development and engineering expenses increased 16.0% for the first quarter of fiscal year
2010 as compared to the first quarter of fiscal year 2009. The increase in the quarter is a result
of increased spending in the whole blood and Arryx blood diagnostics technologies.
Selling, General and Administrative
During the first quarter of fiscal year 2010, selling, general and administrative expenses
increased 4.1%. Foreign exchange resulted in a 3.0% decrease in selling, general and administrative
during the quarter. Excluding the impact of foreign exchange, selling, general and administrative
expense increased 7.1% for the first quarter. The increase was due primarily to (i) expenses
brought on from recent acquisitions (Altivation and Neoteric) that had not been reflected in the
first quarter of fiscal year 2009, (ii) expenses associated with our ERP Phase II go-live, and
(iii) general selling, marketing and handling costs necessary to support the 6.9% increase in
sales. The noted increases were partly offset by a lack of restructuring costs in the first quarter
of fiscal year 2010.
Operating Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended |
|
Percentage |
(in thousands) |
|
June 27, 2009 |
|
June 28, 2008 |
|
Increase |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
$ |
26,327 |
|
|
$ |
19,334 |
|
|
|
36.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of net revenues |
|
|
17.1 |
% |
|
|
13.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Operating income increased 36.2% for the first quarter of fiscal year 2010 as compared to the first
quarter of fiscal year 2009. Foreign exchange resulted in a 37.7% increase in operating income
during the quarter. Without the effects of foreign currency, operating income decreased 1.5% for
the quarter due to the net of sales and gross profit growth offset by increases in operating
expenses.
Other income, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended |
|
Percentage |
(in thousands) |
|
June 27, 2009 |
|
June 28, 2008 |
|
Decrease |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
$ |
(214 |
) |
|
$ |
(24 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
|
157 |
|
|
|
654 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other (expense)/income, net |
|
|
(335 |
) |
|
|
375 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income, net |
|
$ |
(392 |
) |
|
$ |
1,005 |
|
|
|
(139.0 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income, net decreased 139.0% during the first quarter of fiscal year 2010 as compared
to the first quarter of fiscal year 2009 due to the net of the (i) increase in interest expense due
to the FAS 141(R) accounting relating to the contingent consideration on a recent acquisition, (ii)
decrease in interest income due to significantly
reduced investment yield, and (iii) decrease in other income associated with hedge points on
forward contracts. Points on forward contracts are amounts, either expensed or earned, based on
the interest rate differential between two foreign currencies in a forward hedge contract.
28
Income Taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended |
|
Percentage |
|
|
June 27, 2009 |
|
June 28, 2008 |
|
Increase |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reported income tax rate |
|
|
30.3 |
% |
|
|
29.5 |
% |
|
|
0.8 |
% |
Our reported tax rate includes two principal components: an expected effective annual tax rate and
discrete items resulting in additional provisions or benefits that are recorded in the quarter that
an event arises. Events or items that give rise to discrete recognition include finalizing audit
examinations for open tax years, a statute of limitations expiration, or a stock acquisition.
The reported tax rate was 30.3% for the three month period ended June 27, 2009. The reported tax
rate includes:
|
|
A 31.1% expected effective annual tax rate which reflects tax benefits from foreign taxes
(including our Swiss principal) and a domestic manufacturing deduction, offset in part by the
state tax provision, and stock compensation expenses not deductible in all jurisdictions; and |
|
|
|
A $0.7 million benefit (on an annual basis) from the remittance of Japanese earnings. |
The reported tax rate was 29.5% for the three month period ended June 28, 2008. The reported tax
rate includes:
|
|
A 35.1% expected effective annual tax rate which reflects tax benefits from foreign taxes and
stock compensation expenses that are not deductible in all jurisdictions and a domestic
manufacturing deduction, offset in part by the state tax provision, and stock compensation
expenses not deductible in all jurisdictions; and |
|
|
|
A $1.1 million reversal of previously accrued income taxes because of the expiration of
foreign statute of limitations. |
We conduct business globally and, as a result, file we consolidated federal, consolidated and
separate state and foreign income tax returns in multiple jurisdictions. In the normal course of
business, we are subject to examination by taxing authorities throughout the world in jurisdictions
including the U.S., Japan, Germany, France, the United Kingdom, and Switzerland. With few
exceptions, we are no longer subject to U.S. federal, state and local, or foreign income tax
examinations for years before 2006.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
The following table contains certain key performance indicators we believe depict our liquidity and
cash flow position:
29
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 27, 2009 |
|
March 28, 2009 |
|
|
(dollars in thousands) |
Cash & cash equivalents |
|
$ |
173,822 |
|
|
$ |
156,721 |
|
Working capital |
|
$ |
292,102 |
|
|
$ |
289,530 |
|
Current ratio |
|
|
3.8 |
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
Net cash position (1) |
|
$ |
151,462 |
|
|
$ |
150,683 |
|
Days sales outstanding (DSO) |
|
|
67 |
|
|
|
67 |
|
Disposables finished goods
inventory turnover |
|
|
6.6 |
|
|
|
7.1 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Net cash position is the sum of cash and cash equivalents less total debt. |
Our primary sources of capital include cash and cash equivalents, internally generated cash flows,
bank borrowings and option exercises. We believe these sources to be sufficient to fund our
requirements, which are primarily capital expenditures and acquisitions, new business and product
development, and working capital for at least the next twelve months.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended: |
|
|
$ Increase / |
|
|
|
June 27, 2009 |
|
|
June 28, 2008 |
|
|
(Decrease) |
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating activities |
|
$ |
25,706 |
|
|
$ |
13,842 |
|
|
$ |
11,864 |
|
Investing activities |
|
|
(27,923 |
) |
|
|
(12,281 |
) |
|
|
(15,642 |
) |
Financing activities |
|
|
18,844 |
|
|
|
(14,465 |
) |
|
|
33,309 |
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on
cash and cash equivalents (1) |
|
|
474 |
|
|
|
(362 |
) |
|
|
836 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase/(decrease) in cash and cash
equivalents |
|
$ |
17,101 |
|
|
$ |
(13,266 |
) |
|
$ |
30,367 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The balance sheet is affected by spot exchange rates used to translate local currency amounts
into U.S. dollars. In accordance with GAAP, we have removed the effect of foreign currency
throughout our cash flow statement, except for its effect on our cash and cash equivalents. |
In May 2009, Board of Directors approved a $40 million share repurchase. At June 27, 2009, as no
shares had been repurchased, we had the full $40 million remaining on the $40 million share
repurchase limit set by the Board of Directors.
Cash Flow Overview:
Three Month Comparison
Operating Activities:
Net cash provided by operating activities increased by $11.9 million in the first three months of
fiscal year 2010 as compared to the first three months of 2009 due primarily to:
30
|
|
|
$3.7 million increase in net income; |
|
|
|
|
$11.7 million reduced investment in accounts receivable due to improved collections over
the same quarter last year; |
|
|
|
|
$5.5 million reduced investment in inventories; and |
|
|
|
|
$7.4 million reduced investment in prepaid income taxes |
|
|
|
a $15.7 million increase in payments of accounts payable and accrued expenses, which
included a $13.7 million payment of (i) the fiscal year 2009 employee performance bonuses
worldwide and (ii) the discretionary bonus for extraordinary performance to all employees
other than the Chief Executive Officer and certain other executives during the first
quarter of fiscal year 2010. |
Investing Activities:
Net cash used in investing activities increased during the first three months of fiscal year 2010
as compared to the first three months of 2009 due primarily to the $8.8 million increased spending
in capital expenditures on property, plant, and equipment and the $6.6 million acquisition of
Neoteric.
Financing Activities:
Net cash used in financing activities decreased by $33.3 million in the first three months of
fiscal year 2010 as compared to the first three months of 2009 due primarily to:
|
|
|
$24.9 million decrease in stock repurchases and |
|
|
|
|
$13.3 million increase in net borrowings under short-term revolving credit agreements |
|
|
|
$3.9 million decrease in exercise of stock options and tax benefit of stock compensation. |
Inflation
We do not believe that inflation had a significant impact on our results of operations for the
periods presented. Historically, we believe we have been able to mitigate the effects of inflation
by improving our manufacturing and purchasing efficiencies, by increasing employee productivity,
and by adjusting the selling prices of products. We continue to monitor inflation pressures
generally and raw materials indices that may affect our procurement and production costs.
Increases in the price of petroleum derivatives could result in corresponding increases in our
costs to procure plastic raw materials.
Foreign Exchange
Approximately 51% of our sales are generated outside the U.S. in local currencies, yet our
reporting currency is the U.S. dollar. Foreign exchange risk arises because we engage in business
in foreign countries in local currency. Exposure is partially mitigated by producing and sourcing
product in local currency and expenses incurred by local sales offices. However, whenever the U.S.
dollar strengthens relative to the other major currencies, there is
31
an adverse affect on our
results of operations and alternatively, whenever the U.S. dollar weakens relative to the other
major currencies there is a positive effect on our results of operations.
Our primary foreign currency exposures in relation to the U.S. dollar are the Euro and the Japanese
Yen. In response to the global economic turmoil and sharply increased volatility in the foreign
exchange rates, we added to our hedge and enter into forward contracts to hedge the anticipated
cash flows from forecasted Great British Pound and Canadian Dollar denominated expenses.
It is our policy to minimize for a period of time, the unforeseen impact on our financial results
of fluctuations in foreign exchange rates by using derivative financial instruments known as
forward contracts to hedge the anticipated cash flows from forecasted foreign currency denominated
sales. Hedging through the use of forward contracts does not eliminate the volatility of foreign
exchange rates, but because we generally enter into forward contracts one year out, rates are fixed
for a one-year period, thereby facilitating financial planning and resource allocation. We enter
into forward contracts that mature one month prior to the anticipated timing of the forecasted
foreign currency denominated sales. These contracts are designated as cash flow hedges and are
intended to lock in the expected cash flows of forecasted foreign currency denominated sales at the
available spot rate. Actual spot rate gains and losses on these contracts are recorded in sales, at
the same time the underlying transactions being hedged are recorded. The final impact of currency
fluctuations on the results of operations is dependent on the local currency amounts hedged and the
actual local currency results.
Presented below are the spot rates for our Euro and Japanese Yen cash flow hedges that either
settled in fiscal year 2009 and the first quarter of fiscal year 2010, or are presently
outstanding. These hedges cover our long foreign currency positions that result from our sales in
Europe and Japan. The table also shows the relative strengthening or weakening of the spot rates
associated with those hedge contracts versus the spot rates in the contracts that settled in the
prior comparable period.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Strengthen/ |
|
Second |
|
Strengthen/ |
|
Third |
|
Strengthen/ |
|
Fourth |
|
Strengthen/ |
|
|
First Quarter |
|
(Weaken) |
|
Quarter |
|
(Weaken) |
|
Quarter |
|
(Weaken) |
|
Quarter |
|
(Weaken) |
Euro Hedge Spot Rate (US$ per Euro) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY09
|
|
|
1.3453 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.3704 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.4396 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.4908 |
|
|
|
|
|
FY10
|
|
|
1.5681 |
|
|
|
16.6 |
% |
|
|
1.4890 |
|
|
|
8.6 |
% |
|
|
1.3192 |
|
|
|
(8.4 |
%) |
|
|
1.2812 |
|
|
|
(14.1 |
%) |
FY11
|
|
|
1.3582 |
|
|
|
(13.4 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Japanese Yen Hedge Spot Rate (JPY per US$) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY09
|
|
|
120.6432 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
116.7411 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
112.8810 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
106.2511 |
|
|
|
|
|
FY10
|
|
|
105.2792 |
|
|
|
12.7 |
% |
|
|
105.1132 |
|
|
|
10.0 |
% |
|
|
96.3791 |
|
|
|
14.6 |
% |
|
|
93.4950 |
|
|
|
12.0 |
% |
FY11
|
|
|
98.1677 |
|
|
|
6.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
We generally place our cash flow hedge contracts on a rolling twelve month basis. Accordingly, the only hedge contracts placed for fiscal year 2011 are for the first quarter. |
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141 (revised 2007), Business Combinations (SFAS
141(R)). In SFAS 141(R), the FASB retained the fundamental requirements of Statement No. 141 to
account for all business combinations using the acquisition method (formerly the purchase method)
and for an acquiring entity to be identified in all business combinations. However, the new
standard requires the acquiring entity in a business combination to recognize all (and only) the
assets acquired and liabilities assumed in the transaction; establishes the acquisition-date fair
value as the measurement objective for all assets acquired and liabilities assumed; and requires
the acquirer to disclose to investors and other users all of the information they need to evaluate
and understand the nature and financial effect of the business combination. SFAS 141(R) is
effective for annual
32
periods beginning on or after December 15, 2008. This statement became
effective for our fiscal year 2010 and its impact is reflected in our financial position and
results of operations for the three months ended June 27, 2009.
In December 2007, the FASB issued FASB No. 160 Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial
Statementsan amendment of ARB No. 51 of which the objective is to improve the relevance,
comparability, and transparency of the financial information that a reporting entity provides in
its consolidated financial statements by establishing accounting and reporting standards by
requiring all entities to report noncontrolling (minority) interests in subsidiaries in the same
wayas equity in the consolidated financial statements. Moreover, Statement 160 eliminates the
diversity that currently exists in accounting for transactions between an entity and noncontrolling
interests by requiring they be treated as equity transactions. FASB No. 160 is effective for annual
periods beginning on or after December 15, 2008. This statement became effective during fiscal year
2010 and did not have an impact on our financial position and results of operations. The companys
recent acquisition of LAttitude Medical Systems, Inc. (Neoteric) was accounted for under SFAS
141(R)see Note 9 to the interim consolidated financial statements.
Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Information
Statements contained in this report, as well as oral statements we make which are prefaced with the
words may, will, expect, anticipate, continue, estimate, project, intend,
designed, and similar expressions, are intended to identify forward looking statements regarding
events, conditions, and financial trends that may affect our future plans of operations, business
strategy, results of operations, and financial position. These statements are based on our current
expectations and estimates as to prospective events and circumstances about which we can give no
firm assurance. Further, any forward-looking statement speaks only as of the date on which such
statement is made, and we undertake no obligation to update any forward-looking statement to
reflect events or circumstances after the date on which such statement is made. As it is not
possible to predict every new factor that may emerge, forward-looking statements should not be
relied upon as a prediction of our actual future financial condition or results. These
forward-looking statements, like any forward-looking statements, involve risks and uncertainties
that could cause actual results to differ materially from those projected or anticipated. Such
risks and uncertainties include technological advances in the medical field, and our standards for
transfusion medicine and our ability to successfully implement products that incorporate such
advances and standards, product demand and market acceptance of our products, regulatory
requirements, the effect of economic and political conditions, the impact of competitive products
and pricing, price volatility in petroleum products (plastics are the principal component of our
disposables, which are the main source of our revenues), the impact of industry consolidation,
foreign currency exchange rates, changes in customers ordering patterns, the effect of industry
consolidation as seen in the Plasma market, the effect of communicable diseases and the effect of
uncertainties in markets outside the U.S. (including Europe and Asia) in which we operate. The
foregoing list should not be construed as exhaustive.
33
ITEM 3. Quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk
The Companys exposures relative to market risk are due to foreign exchange risk and interest rate
risk.
Foreign
exchange risk
See the section entitled Foreign Exchange for a discussion of how foreign currency affects our
business. It is our policy to minimize for a period of time, the unforeseen impact on our
financial results of fluctuations in foreign exchange rates by using derivative financial
instruments known as forward contracts to hedge anticipated cash flows from forecasted foreign
currency denominated sales. We do not use the financial instruments for speculative or trading
activities. At June 27, 2009, we had the following significant foreign exchange contracts to hedge
the anticipated cash flows from forecasted foreign currency denominated sales outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(BUY) / SELL |
|
|
Weighted Spot |
|
Weighted Forward |
|
Fair Value |
|
|
|
|
Hedged Currency |
|
Local Currency |
|
|
Contract Rate |
|
Contract Rate |
|
Gain / (Loss) |
|
|
Maturity |
|
Euro |
|
|
7,700,000 |
|
|
|
1.449 |
|
|
|
1.424 |
|
|
$ |
228,514 |
|
|
Jul 2009 - Aug 2009 |
Euro |
|
|
11,307,000 |
|
|
|
1.319 |
|
|
|
1.313 |
|
|
|
($893,920 |
) |
|
Sep 2009 - Nov 2009 |
Euro |
|
|
10,584,808 |
|
|
|
1.281 |
|
|
|
1.282 |
|
|
|
($1,134,635 |
) |
|
Dec 2009 - Feb 2010 |
Euro |
|
|
9,582,063 |
|
|
|
1.358 |
|
|
|
1.357 |
|
|
|
($336,623 |
) |
|
Mar 2009 - May 2010 |
Japanese Yen |
|
|
1,045,432,888 |
|
|
|
105.17 |
per US$ |
|
|
103.62 |
per US$ |
|
|
($855,110 |
) |
|
Jul 2009 - Aug 2009 |
Japanese Yen |
|
|
1,628,684,654 |
|
|
|
96.38 |
per US$ |
|
|
95.33 |
per US$ |
|
$ |
4,070 |
|
|
Sep 2009 - Nov 2009 |
Japanese Yen |
|
|
1,394,096,500 |
|
|
|
93.50 |
per US$ |
|
|
92.58 |
per US$ |
|
$ |
400,513 |
|
|
Dec 2009 - Feb 2010 |
Japanese Yen |
|
|
1,369,475,624 |
|
|
|
98.17 |
per US$ |
|
|
97.50 |
per US$ |
|
|
($346,345 |
) |
|
Mar 2009 - May 2010 |
GBP |
|
|
(856,706 |
) |
|
|
1.433 |
|
|
|
1.433 |
|
|
$ |
179,324 |
|
|
Jul 2009 - Aug 2009 |
GBP |
|
|
(2,639,558 |
) |
|
|
1.423 |
|
|
|
1.423 |
|
|
$ |
570,022 |
|
|
Sep 2009 - Nov 2009 |
GBP |
|
|
(2,274,093 |
) |
|
|
1.405 |
|
|
|
1.406 |
|
|
$ |
519,687 |
|
|
Dec 2009 - Feb 2010 |
GBP |
|
|
(2,276,051 |
) |
|
|
1.471 |
|
|
|
1.472 |
|
|
$ |
367,178 |
|
|
Mar 2009 - May 2010 |
GBP |
|
|
(954,611 |
) |
|
|
1.628 |
|
|
|
1.627 |
|
|
$ |
13,193 |
|
|
Mar 2009 - May 2010 |
CAD |
|
|
(3,730,057 |
) |
|
|
1.120 |
|
|
|
1.119 |
|
|
|
($93,389 |
) |
|
Jul 2009 - Aug 2009 |
CAD |
|
|
(3,247,851 |
) |
|
|
1.113 |
|
|
|
1.111 |
|
|
|
($99,476 |
) |
|
Sep 2009 - Nov 2009 |
CAD |
|
|
(3,761,190 |
) |
|
|
1.088 |
|
|
|
1.086 |
|
|
|
($186,551 |
) |
|
Dec 2009 - Feb 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($1,663,548 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We estimate the change in the fair value of all forward contracts assuming both a 10% strengthening
and weakening of the U.S. dollar relative to all other major currencies. In the event of a 10%
strengthening of the U.S. dollar, the change in fair value of all forward contracts would result in
a $11.1 million increase in the fair value of the forward contracts; whereas a 10% weakening of the
US dollar would result in a $12.7 million decrease in the fair value of the forward contracts.
Interest Rate Risk
All of our long-term debt is at fixed rates. Accordingly, a change in interest rates has an
insignificant effect on our interest expense amounts. The fair value of our long-term debt,
however, does change in response to interest rate movements due to its fixed rate nature. These
changes reflect the premium (when market interest rates decline below the contract fixed interest
rates) or discount (when market interest rates rise above the fixed interest rate) that an investor
in these long term obligations would pay in the market interest rate environment.
At June 27, 2009, the fair value of our long-term debt was approximately $0.8 million higher than
the value of the debt reflected on our financial statements. This higher fair market is entirely
related to the $5.2 million remaining principal balance of the original $10.0 million, 8.41% real
estate mortgage due January, 2016.
34
Using scenario analysis, if the interest rate on all long-term maturities changed by 10% from the
rate levels that existed at June 27, 2009, the fair value of our long-term debt would change by
approximately $0.1 million.
ITEM 4. Controls and Procedures
We conducted an evaluation, as of June 27, 2009, under the supervision and with the participation
of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer (the Companys
principal executive officer and principal financial officer, respectively) regarding the
effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as defined in
Rule 13a-15 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act). Based upon that
evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure
controls and procedures are effective.
In fiscal 2007, the Company initiated a company-wide implementation of Oracle, a global enterprise
resource planning (ERP) system. The Company successfully completed the final major go-live
milestone implementations in the ERP system during the three months ended June 27, 2009. The ERP
implementation replaced our existing production planning, manufacturing, and purchasing systems,
resulting in significant changes to our business processes and therefore our controls. These
changes are intended to standardize and automate business processes and controls. We believe the
controls, as implemented, are appropriate and functioning effectively.
Other than the change mentioned above, no other change in the Companys internal control over
financial reporting occurred during the three months ended June 27, 2009 that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Companys internal control over
financial reporting.
35
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
In December 2005, we filed a lawsuit against Baxter Healthcare SA and Fenwal Inc. in Massachusetts
federal district court, seeking an injunction and damages on account of Baxters infringement of a
Haemonetics patent, through the sale of Baxters ALYX brand automated red cell collection system, a
competitor of our automated red cell collection systems. In March
2007, Baxter sold the Transfusion
Technologies Division (which markets the ALYX product) to private investors, Texas Pacific Group
and Maverick Capital, Ltd. The new company which resulted from the sale was renamed Fenwal. In
January 2009, a jury found that the Fenwal ALYX system infringed Haemonetics patent and awarded us
$15.7 million in damages for past infringement. On June 2, 2009, the court ruled that, in addition
to paying the damages awarded by the jury, Fenwal must stop selling the ALYX consumable by December
1, 2010 and must pay Haemonetics a 10% royalty on ALYX consumable net sales from January 30, 2009
until December 1, 2010 when the injunction takes effect. In addition, the court awarded
pre-judgment interest at 5% on the unpaid damages awarded. These rulings may be appealed by Fenwal
or Baxter.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
In addition to the other information set forth in this report, careful consideration should be
given to the factors discussed in Part 1, Item 1A. Risk Factors in the Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended March 28, 2009, which could materially affect the Companys business,
financial condition or future results. The risks described in the Companys Annual Report on Form
10-K are not the only risks facing the Company. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently
known to the Company or that it currently deems to be immaterial also may materially adversely
affect its business, financial condition and/or operating results.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
Not applicable
Item 3. Defaults upon Senior Securities
Not applicable.
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
None
Item 5. Other Information
None
Item 6. Exhibits
|
|
|
10Y
|
|
Change in Control Agreement entered into between the Company and
Brian Concannon on April 2, 2009 |
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Certification pursuant to Section 302 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
of Brian Concannon, President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company |
36
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certification pursuant to Section 302 of Sarbanes-Oxley of 2002, of
Christopher Lindop, Chief Financial Officer and Vice President
Business Development of the Company |
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
Certification Pursuant to 18 United States Code Section 1350, as
adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
of Brian Concannon, President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company |
|
|
|
32.2
|
|
Certification Pursuant to 18 United States Code Section 1350, as
adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
of Christopher Lindop, Chief Financial Officer and Vice President
Business Development of the Company |
37
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
HAEMONETICS CORPORATION
|
|
Date: August 5, 2009 |
By: |
/s/ Brian Concannon
|
|
|
|
Brian Concannon, President and Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
(Principal Executive Officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
Date: August 5, 2009 |
By: |
/s/ Christopher Lindop
|
|
|
|
Christopher Lindop, Chief Financial
Officer and Vice
President Business Development (Principal Financial Officer) |
|
|
38
exv10wy
Exhibit 10Y
AMENDED AND RESTATED
CHANGE IN CONTROL AGREEMENT
This Amended and Restated Officer Change in Control Agreement (this Agreement), made
effective on April 2, 2009 (the Effective Date), between Haemonetics Corporation, a Massachusetts
corporation with its principal offices at 400 Wood Road, Braintree, Massachusetts, 02184, (herein
referred to as the Company) and Brian Concannon (the Officer). The Company and the Officer are
collectively referred to herein as the Parties and individually referred to as a Party.
WITNESSETH THAT
WHEREAS, the Officer is employed by the Company as a senior executive of the Company or one,
or more than one, of the Companys subsidiaries; and
WHEREAS, under the Agreement for Change-of-Control Benefit dated January 19, 2006 between the
Company and the Officer (the Prior Agreement), the Board of Directors of the Company (the
Board) decided that the Company should provide certain compensation and benefits to the Officer
in the event that the Officers employment is terminated on or after a change in the ownership or
control of the Company under certain circumstances;
WHEREAS, the Companys Compensation Committee has reviewed the Prior Agreement in light of
prevaling market practices and corporate governance standards; and
WHEREAS, the Parties desire to replace the Prior Agreement with this Agreement as set forth
below.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the promises and the mutual covenants contained herein,
the Parties agree as follows:
1. |
|
Purpose. The Company considers a sound and vital management team to be essential.
Management personnel who become concerned about the possibility that the Company may undergo a
Change in Control (as defined in Paragraph 2 below) may terminate employment or become
distracted. Accordingly, the Board has determined to extend this Agreement to minimize the
distraction the Officer may suffer from the possibility of a Change in Control. |
Page 1 of 12
2. |
|
Change in Control. The term Change in Control for purposes of this Agreement shall
mean the earliest to occur of the following events during the Term (as defined in Paragraph
3(d) below): |
|
(a) |
|
a person, or any two or more persons acting as a group, and all affiliates of
such person or persons, who prior to such time owned less than thirty-five percent
(35%) of the then outstanding shares of the Companys $0.01 par value common stock
(Common Stock), shall acquire such additional shares of the Companys Common Stock in
one or more transactions, or series of transactions, such that following such
transaction or transactions such person or group and affiliates beneficially own
thirty-five percent (35%) or more of the Companys Common Stock outstanding, |
|
|
(b) |
|
closing of the sale of all or substantially all of the assets of the Company on
a consolidated basis to an unrelated person or entity, and |
|
|
(c) |
|
there is a consummation of any merger, reorganization, consolidation or share
exchange unless the persons who were the beneficial owners of the outstanding shares of
the common stock of Company immediately before the consummation of such transaction
beneficially own more than 50% of the outstanding shares of the common stock of the
successor or survivor entity in such transaction immediately following the consummation
of such transaction. For purposes of this Paragraph 2(c), the percentage of the
beneficially owned shares of the successor or survivor entity described above shall be
determined exclusively by reference to the shares of the successor or survivor entity
which result from the beneficial ownership of shares of common stock of the Company by
the persons described above immediately before the consummation of such transaction. |
3. |
|
Term. The initial term of this Agreement shall extend until April 2, 2014 (the Initial
Term); provided, however, that this Agreement shall automatically renew for successive additional
five year periods (Renewal Terms) unless notice of nonrenewal is given by either Party to the
other Party at least one year prior to the end of the Initial Term or, if applicable, the then
current Renewal Term; and provided, further, that if a Change of Control occurs during the Term,
the Term shall automatically extend until the second anniversary of the Change in Control (the
Protection Period). The Term of this Agreement shall be the Initial Term plus all Renewal Terms
and, if applicable, the duration of the Protection Period. At the end of the Term, this Agreement
shall terminate without further action by either the Company or the Executive. If no Change in
Control occurs prior to expiration of the Term or if the Officer Separates from Service (as defined
in Paragraph 4(a) below) before a Change in Control, this Agreement shall automatically terminate
without any further action; provided, however, that Paragraph 13 (regarding arbitration) shall
continue to apply to the extent the Officer disputes the termination of this Agreement. The
obligations of the Company and the Officer under this Agreement which by their nature may require
either partial or total performance after its expiration shall survive any such expiration. |
Page 2 of 12
4. |
|
Severance Benefits. If, during the Protection Period (as defined in Paragraph
3(a)(ii) above), the Officer Separates from Service (as defined in Paragraph 5(a) below) due
to termination of employment by the Company and its subsidiaries without Cause (as
defined in Paragraph 5(b)) or by the Officer due to Constructive Termination (as defined
in Paragraph 5(c)) (each, a Qualifying Termination), the Officer shall be entitled to the
severance benefits set forth in this Paragraph 4. The Officer shall not be entitled to
severance benefits upon any other Separation from Service, including a termination of
employment by the Company for Cause or due to the Officers death or Disability (as
defined in Paragraph 5(d)). The payments and benefits provided for under this Paragraph 4
shall be in lieu of any other severance benefits otherwise payable by the Company to the
Officer and shall be subject to reduction due to application of the Section 280G Cap as
provided under Paragraph 6 below. Payment of the severance benefits as may be reduced by
the 280G Cap, if applicable, shall commence 30 days after a Qualifying Termination, provided
that the Officer has timely executed a release that is not revoked as provided under
Paragraph 7 below. No severance benefit shall be paid if the Executive has not timely
executed a release under Paragraph 7. |
|
(a) |
|
Salary and Bonus Amount. The Company will pay to the Officer thirty
days after a Qualifying Termination a lump sum cash amount equal to the product
obtained by multiplying: |
|
(i) |
|
the sum of (A) salary at the annualized rate which was being
paid by the Company and/or subsidiaries to the Officer immediately prior to the
time of such termination or, if greater, at the time of the Change in Control
plus (B) the annual target bonus and/or any other annual cash incentive award
opportunity applicable to the Officer at the time of the Qualifying Termination
or, if greater, at the time of the Change in Control, by |
|
|
(ii) |
|
2.99 |
|
(b) |
|
Payment for Welfare Benefits. The Officer shall be entitled to receive
a lump sum cash amount intended to cover the approximate cost of the Companys portion
of the premiums necessary to continue the coverage under the Officers medical, dental,
life insurance and disability insurance coverages (collectively, the Welfare
Benefits) as in effect upon Separation from Service for a period of three years
following a Qualifying Termination. For avoidance of doubt, medical coverage for this
purpose shall include medical coverage provided to members of the Executives immediate
family under a Company sponsored plan, policy or program at the time of the Executives
employment termination, and premiums with respect to medical and dental coverage shall
be determined using the rate charged for COBRA coverage. The Officer shall be entitled
to elect continued Welfare Benefit is as provided under any employee benefit plan,
policy or program sponsored by the Company as in effect on the Officers Separation
from Service, including but not limited to COBRA. |
Page 3 of 12
|
(c) |
|
Outplacement Services. In the event of a Qualifying Termination, the
Company shall provide to the Officer executive outplacement services provided on a
one-to-one basis by a senior counselor of a firm nationally recognized as a reputable
national provider of such services for up to twelve months following Separation from
Service, plus evaluation testing, at a location mutually agreeable to the Parties. |
|
|
(d) |
|
Equity Awards. The vesting of the Officers Equity Awards shall be
governed by this Section 4(d). The term Equity Award shall mean stock options, stock
appreciation rights, restricted stock, restricted stock units, performance shares or
any other form of award that is measured with reference to the Companys Common Stock. |
|
(i) |
|
The vesting of the Officers Equity Awards granted on or after
the Effective Date that vest solely on the basis of continued employment with
the Company or any of its subsidiaries shall be accelerated solely by reason of
a Change in Control only if the surviving corporation or acquiring corporation
following a Change in Control refuses to assume or continue the Officers
Equity Awards or to substitute similar Equity Awards for those outstanding
immediately prior to the Change in Control. If such Officers Equity Awards
are so continued, assumed or substituted and at any time after the Change in
Control the Officer incurs a Qualifying Termination, then the vesting and
exercisability of all such unvested Equity Awards held by the Officer that are
then outstanding shall be accelerated in full and any reacquisition rights held
by the Company with respect to any such Equity Award shall lapse in full, in
each case, upon such termination. |
|
|
(ii) |
|
The vesting of the Officers Equity Awards that vest, in whole
or in part, based upon achieving Performance Criteria shall be accelerated on a
pro rata basis by reason of a Change in Control. The pro rata vesting amount
shall equal the designated target award multiplied by a fraction, the numerator
of which is the number of days the Officer was employed during the awards
performance period as of the date of the Change in Control, and (b) the
denominator is the number of days in the performance period. For purposes of
this Paragraph 4(d), Performance Criteria means any business criteria that
apply to the Officer, a business unit, division, subsidiary, affiliate, the
Company or any combination of the foregoing. |
|
|
(iii) |
|
Enforcement of the terms of this Paragraph 4(d) shall survive
termination of this Agreement. |
Equity Awards granted before the Effective Date shall not be subject to this
Paragraph 4(d).
Page 4 of 12
By accepting severance benefits under this Paragraph 4, the Officer waives the Officers right, if
any, to have any payment made under this Paragraph 4 taken into account to increase the benefits
otherwise payable to, or on behalf of, the Officer under any employee benefit plan, policy or
program, whether qualified or nonqualified, maintained by the Company (e.g., there will be no
increase in the Officers tax-qualified retirement plan benefits, non-qualified deferred
compensation plan benefits or life insurance because of severance benefits received hereunder).
5. |
|
Definitions of Separation from Service, Cause, Constructive Termination, and
Disability. For purposes of this Agreement, the following terms shall have the meanings
set forth below: |
|
(a) |
|
The term Separation from Service or Separates from Service for purposes of
this Agreement shall mean a separation from service within the meaning of Section
409A of the Code (after applying the presumptions in Treas. Reg. Sect. 1.409A-1(h)). |
|
|
(b) |
|
Cause means (i) the Officers conviction of (or a plea of guilty or nolo
contendere to) a felony or any other crime involving moral turpitude, dishonesty,
fraud, theft or financial impropriety; or (ii) a determination by a majority of the
Board in good faith that the Officer has (A) willfully and continuously failed to
perform substantially the Officers duties (other than any such failure resulting from
the Officers Disability or incapacity due to bodily injury or physical or mental
illness), after a written demand for substantial performance is delivered to the
Officer by the Board that specifically identifies the manner in which the Board
believes that the Officer has not substantially performed the Officers duties, (B)
engaged in illegal conduct, an act of dishonesty or gross misconduct, or (C) willfully
violated a material requirement of the Companys code of conduct or the Officers
fiduciary duty to the Company. No act or failure to act on the part of the Officer
shall be considered willful unless it is done, or omitted to be done, by the Officer
in bad faith and without reasonable belief that the Officers action or omission was
in, or not opposed to, the best interests of the Company or its subsidiaries. In order
to terminate the Officers employment for Cause, the Company shall be required to
provide the Officer a reasonable opportunity to be heard (with counsel) before the
Board, which shall include at least ten (10) business days of advance written notice to
the Officer. Further, the Officers attempt to secure employment with another employer
that does not breach the Officers non-competition obligations shall not constitute an
event of Cause. |
|
|
(c) |
|
Constructive Termination means, without the express written consent of the
Officer, the occurrence of any of the following during the Protection Period (as
defined in Paragraph 3(a)(ii) above): |
|
(i) |
|
a material reduction in the Officers annual base salary as in
effect immediately prior to a Change in Control or as the same may be increased
from time to time, and/or a material failure to provide the Officer with an
opportunity to earn annual incentive compensation and long-term |
Page 5 of 12
|
|
|
incentive compensation at least as favorable as in effect immediately prior to a Change
of Control or as the same may be increased from time to time, |
|
|
(ii) |
|
a material diminution in the Officers authority, duties, or
responsibilities as in effect at the time of the Change in Control; |
|
|
(iii) |
|
a material diminution in the authority, duties, or
responsibilities of the supervisor to whom the Officer is required to report
(it being understood that if the Officer reports to the Board, a requirement
that the Officer report to any individual or body other than the Board will
constitute Constructive Termination hereunder); |
|
|
(iv) |
|
a material diminution in the budget over which the Officer
retains authority; |
|
|
(v) |
|
the Companys requiring the Officer to be based anywhere
outside a fifty mile radius of the Companys offices at which the Officer is
based as of immediately prior to a Change of Control (or any subsequent
location at which the Officer has previously consented to be based) except for
required travel on the Companys business to an extent that is not
substantially greater than the Officers business travel obligations as of
immediately prior to a Change in Control or, if more favorable, as of any time
thereafter; or |
|
|
(vi) |
|
any other action or inaction that constitutes a material breach
by the Company or any of its subsidiaries of the terms of this Agreement. |
In no event shall the Officer be entitled to terminate employment with the Company
on account of Constructive Termination unless the Officer provides notice of the
existence of the purported condition that constitutes Constructive Termination
within a period not to exceed ninety (90) days of its initial existence, and the
Company fails to cure such condition (if curable) within thirty (30) days after the
receipt of such notice.
|
(d) |
|
Disability means the Officers inability, due to physical or mental
incapacity resulting from injury, sickness or disease, for one hundred and eighty (180)
days in any twelve-month period to perform his duties hereunder. |
6. |
|
Section 280G Restriction. Notwithstanding any provision of this Agreement to the
contrary, the following provisions shall apply: |
|
(a) |
|
If it is determined that part or all of the compensation and benefits payable
to the Officer (whether pursuant to the terms of this Agreement or otherwise) before
application of this Paragraph 6 would constitute parachute payments under Section
280G of the Code, and the payment thereof would cause the Officer to incur the 20%
excise tax under Section 4999 of the Code, then the amounts |
Page 6 of 12
|
|
|
otherwise payable to or for
the benefit of the Officer pursuant to this Agreement (or otherwise) that, but for this
Paragraph 6 would be parachute payments,
(referred to below as the Total Payments) shall either (i) be reduced so that the
present value of the Total Payments to be received by the Officer will be equal to
three times the base amount (as defined under Section 280G of the Code less $1,000
(the 280G Cap), or (ii) paid in full, whichever produces the better after-tax
position to the Officer (taking into account all applicable taxes, including but not
limited to the excise tax under Section 4999 of the Code and any federal and state
income and employment taxes). Any required reduction under clause (A) above shall
be made in a manner that maximizes the net after-tax amount payable to the Officer,
as reasonably determined by the Consultant (as defined below). |
|
|
(b) |
|
All determinations required under this Paragraph 6 shall be made by a
nationally recognized accounting, executive compensation or law firm appointed by the
Company (the Consultant) that is reasonably acceptable to the Officer on the basis of
substantial authority (within the meaning of Section 6662 of the Code). The
Consultants fee shall be paid by the Company. The Consultant shall provide a report
to the Officer that may be used by the Officer to file the Officers federal tax
returns. |
|
|
(c) |
|
It is possible that payments could be made by the Company that should not have
been made pursuant to this Paragraph 6. If a reduced payment or benefit is provided
and through error or otherwise that payment or benefit, when aggregated with other
payments and benefits from the Company (or its subsidiaries) used in determining the
280G Cap, then the Officer shall immediately repay such excess in cash to the Company
upon notification that an overpayment has been made. |
|
|
(d) |
|
Nothing in this Paragraph 6 shall require the Company to be responsible for, or
have any liability or obligation with respect to, any excise tax liability under
Section 4999 of the Code. |
7. |
|
Release. The Officer agrees that the Company will have no obligations to the Officer
under Paragraph 4 above until the Officer executes a release in a form acceptable by the
Company and, further, will have no further obligations to the Officer under Paragraph 4 if the
Officer revokes such release. The Officer shall have 21 days after Separation from Service to
consider whether or not to sign the release. If the Officer fails to return an executed
release to the Companys Vice President of Human Resources within such 21 day period, or the
Officer subsequently revokes a timely filed release, the Company shall have no obligation to
pay any amounts or benefits under Paragraph 4 of this Agreement. |
|
8. |
|
No Interference with Other Vested Benefits. Regardless of the circumstances under
which the Officer may terminate from employment, the Officer shall have a right to any
benefits under any employee benefit plan, policy or program maintained by the Company which
the Officer had a right to receive under the terms of such employee benefit plan, policy or
program after a termination of the Officers employment without regard to this Agreement. The
Company shall within thirty (30) days of Separation from Service pay |
Page 7 of 12
|
|
the Officer any earned but unpaid base salary and bonus, shall promptly pay the Officer
for any earned but untaken vacation and shall promptly reimburse the Officer for any
incurred but unreimbursed expenses which are otherwise reimbursable under the Companys
expense reimbursement policy as in effect for senior executives immediately before the
Officers employment termination. |
9. |
|
Consolidation or Merger. If the Company is at any time before or after a Change in
Control merged or consolidated into or with any other corporation, association, partnership or
other entity (whether or not the Company is the surviving entity), or if substantially all of
the assets thereof are transferred to another corporation, association, partnership or other
entity, the provisions of this Agreement will be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the
corporation, association, partnership or other entity resulting from such merger or
consolidation or the acquirer of such assets (collectively, acquiring entity) unless the
Officer voluntarily elects not to become an employee of the acquiring entity as determined in
good faith by the Officer. Furthermore, in the event of any such consolidation or transfer of
substantially all of the assets of the Company, the Company shall enter into an agreement with
the acquiring entity that shall provide that such acquiring entity shall assume this Agreement
and all obligations and liabilities under this Agreement; provided, that the Companys failure
to comply with this provision shall not adversely affect any right of the Officer hereunder.
This Paragraph 9 will apply in the event of any subsequent merger or consolidation or transfer
of assets. |
|
|
|
In the event of any merger, consolidation or sale of assets described above, nothing
contained in this Agreement will detract from or otherwise limit the Officers right to or
privilege of participation in any restricted stock plan, bonus or incentive plan, stock
option or purchase plan, profit sharing, pension, group insurance, hospitalization or other
compensation or benefit plan or arrangement which may be or become applicable to officers of
the corporation resulting from such merger or consolidation or the corporation acquiring
such assets of the Company. |
|
|
|
In the event of any merger, consolidation or sale of assets described above, references to
the Company in this Agreement shall, unless the context suggests otherwise, be deemed to
include the entity resulting from such merger or consolidation or the acquirer of such
assets of the Company. |
|
10. |
|
No Mitigation. The Company agrees that the Officer is not required to seek other
employment after a Qualifying Termination or to attempt in any way to reduce any amounts
payable to the Officer by the Company under Paragraph 4 of this Agreement. Further, the
amount of any payment or benefit provided for in this Agreement shall not be reduced by any
compensation earned by the Officer as the result of employment by another employer, by
retirement benefits, by offset against any amount claimed to be owed by the Officer to the
Company, or otherwise. |
|
11. |
|
Payments. All payments provided for in this Agreement shall be paid in cash in the
currency of the primary jurisdiction in which the Executive provided services to the Company
and its subsidiaries immediately prior to Separation from Service. The |
Page 8 of 12
|
|
Company shall not be required to fund or otherwise segregate assets to ensure payments under
this Agreement. |
|
12. |
|
Tax Withholding; Section 409A. |
|
(a) |
|
All payments made by the Company to the Officer or the Officers dependents,
beneficiaries or estate will be subject to the withholding of such amounts relating to
tax and/or other payroll deductions as may be required by law. |
|
|
(b) |
|
The Parties intend that the benefits and payments provided under this Agreement
shall be exempt from, or comply with, the requirements of Section 409A of the Code.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Company shall in no event be obligated to indemnify
the Officer for any taxes or interest that may be assessed by the IRS pursuant to
Section 409A of the Code. |
|
(a) |
|
The Parties shall submit any disputes arising under this Agreement to an
arbitration panel conducting a binding arbitration in Boston, Massachusetts or at such
other location as may be agreeable to the Parties, in accordance with the National
Rules for the Resolution of Employment Disputes of the American Arbitration Association
in effect on the date of such arbitration (the Rules), and judgment upon the award
rendered by the arbitrator or arbitrators may be entered in any court having
jurisdiction thereof. The award of the arbitrator shall be final and shall be the sole
and exclusive remedy between the Parties regarding any claims, counterclaims, issues or
accountings presented to the arbitrator. |
|
|
(b) |
|
The Parties agree that the arbitration shall be conducted by one (1) person
mutually acceptable to the Company and the Officer, provided that if the Parties cannot
agree on an arbitrator within thirty (30) days of filing a notice of arbitration, the
arbitrator shall be selected by the manager of the principal office of the American
Arbitration Association in Suffolk County in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. Any
action to enforce or vacate the arbitrators award shall be governed by the federal
Arbitration Act, if applicable, and otherwise by applicable state law. |
|
|
(c) |
|
If either Party pursues any claim, dispute or controversy against the other in
a proceeding other than the arbitration provided for herein, the responding Party shall
be entitled to dismissal or injunctive relief regarding such action and recovery of all
costs, losses and attorneys fees related to such action. |
|
|
(d) |
|
All of Officers reasonable costs and expenses incurred in connection with such
arbitration shall be paid in full by the Company promptly on written demand from the
Officer, including the arbitrators fees, administrative fees, travel expenses,
out-of-pocket expenses such as copying and telephone, court costs, witness fees
and attorneys fees; provided, however, the Company shall pay no more than |
Page 9 of 12
|
|
|
$50,000 per year in attorneys fees unless a higher figure is awarded in the arbitration, in
which event the Company shall pay the figure awarded in the arbitration. |
|
(e) |
|
Reimbursement of reasonable costs and expenses under Paragraph 13(d) shall be
administered consistent with the following additional requirements as set forth in
Treas. Reg. § 1.409A-3(i)(1)(iv): (i) the Officers eligibility for benefits in one
year will not affect the Officers eligibility for benefits in any other year; (ii) any
reimbursement of eligible expenses will be made on or before the last day of the year
following the year in which the expense was incurred; and (iii) the Officers right to
benefits is not subject to liquidation or exchange for another benefit.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, reimbursement for benefits under this Paragraph 13 shall
commence no earlier than six months and a day after the Officers Separation from
Service. |
|
|
(f) |
|
The Officer acknowledges and expressly agrees that this arbitration provision
constitutes a voluntary waiver of trial by jury in any action or proceeding to which
the Officer or the Company may be parties arising out of or pertaining to this
Agreement. |
14. |
|
Assignment; Payment on Death. |
|
(a) |
|
The provisions of this Agreement shall be binding upon and shall inure to the
benefit of the Officer, the Officers executors, administrators, legal representatives
and assigns and the Company and its successors. |
|
|
(b) |
|
In the event that the Officer becomes entitled to payments under this Agreement
and subsequently dies, all amounts payable to the Officer hereunder and not yet paid to
the Officer at the time of the Officers death shall be paid to the Officers
beneficiary. No right or interest to or in any payments shall be assignable by the
Officer; provided, however, that this provision shall not preclude the Officer from
designating one or more beneficiaries to receive any amount that may be payable after
the Officers death and shall not preclude the legal representatives of the Officers
estate from assigning any right hereunder to the person or persons entitled thereto
under the Officers will or, in the case of intestacy, to the person or persons
entitled thereto under the laws of intestacy applicable to the Officers estate. The
term beneficiary as used in this Agreement shall mean the beneficiary or
beneficiaries so designated by the Officer to receive such amount or, if no such
beneficiary is in existence at the time of the Officers death, the legal
representative of the Officers estate. |
|
|
(c) |
|
No right, benefit or interest hereunder shall be subject to anticipation,
alienation, sale, assignment, encumbrance, charge, pledge, hypothecation, or set-off in
respect of any claim, debt or obligation, or to execution, attachment, levy or
similar process, or assignment by operation of law. Any attempt, voluntary or |
Page 10 of 12
|
|
|
involuntary, to effect any action specified in the immediately preceding sentence
shall, to the full extent permitted by law, be null, void and of no effect. |
15. |
|
Amendments and Waivers. Except as otherwise specified in this Agreement, this
Agreement may be amended, and the observance of any term of this Agreement may be waived
(either generally or in a particular instance and either retroactively or prospectively), only
with the written consent of the Parties. |
|
16. |
|
Integration. The terms of this Agreement shall supersede any prior agreements,
understandings, arrangements or representations, oral or otherwise, expressed or implied, with
respect to the subject matter hereof which have been made by either Party, including
but not limited to the Prior Agreement. By signing this Agreement, the Officer releases and
discharges the Company from any and all obligations and liabilities heretofore or now existing
under or by virtue of such prior agreements. |
|
17. |
|
Notices. For the purpose of this Agreement, notices and all other communications
provided for in this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be deemed to have been duly given
(a) on the date of delivery if delivered by hand, (b) on the date of transmission, if
delivered by confirmed facsimile, (c) on the first business day following the date of deposit
if delivered by guaranteed overnight delivery service, or (d) on the fourth business day
following the date delivered or mailed by United States registered or certified mail, return
receipt requested, postage prepaid, addressed as follows: |
If to the Officer: at the address (or to the facsimile number) shown on the records
of the Company.
If to the Company:
General Counsel
Haemonetics Corporation
400 Wood Road
Braintree, MA 02184
or to such other address as either Party may have furnished to the other in writing in
accordance herewith, except that notices of change of address shall be effective only upon
receipt.
18. |
|
Severability. Any provision of this Agreement held to be unenforceable under
applicable law will be enforced to the maximum extent possible, and the balance of this
Agreement will remain in full force and effect. |
|
19. |
|
Headings of No Effect. The paragraph headings contained in this Agreement are
included solely for convenience or reference and shall not in any way affect the meaning or
interpretation of any of the provisions of this Agreement. |
Page 11 of 12
20. |
|
Not an Employment Contract. This Agreement is not an employment contract and shall
not give the Officer the right to continue in employment by Company or any of its subsidiaries
for any period of time or from time to time. This Agreement shall not adversely affect the
right of the Company or any of its subsidiaries to terminate the Officers employment with or
without cause at any time. |
|
21. |
|
Governing Law. This Agreement and its validity, interpretation, performance and
enforcement shall be governed by the laws of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts (without
reference to the choice of law principles thereof). |
|
20. |
|
Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in counterparts, each of which will be
deemed an original, but all of which together will constitute one and the same instrument. |
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Agreement to be executed by its officers thereto
duly authorized, and the Officer has signed this Agreement.
|
|
|
|
|
|
HAEMONETICS CORPORATION
|
|
Date: April 2, 2009 |
By: |
/s/ Brad Nutter
|
|
|
|
Brad Nutter |
|
|
|
Its: Chairman of the Board |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: April 2, 2009 |
OFFICER
|
|
|
/s/ Brian Concannon
|
|
|
Brian Concannon, |
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
Page 12 of 12
exv31w1
EXHIBIT 31.1
CERTIFICATION
I, Brian Concannon, certify that:
1. |
|
I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Haemonetics Corporation; |
|
2. |
|
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report; |
|
3. |
|
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented
in this report; |
|
4. |
|
The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: |
|
a) |
|
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared; |
|
|
b) |
|
Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such
internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to
provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and
the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles; |
|
|
c) |
|
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and |
|
|
d) |
|
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect the
registrants internal control over financial reporting; and |
5. |
|
The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions): |
|
a) |
|
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely
to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and |
|
|
b) |
|
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting. |
Date: August 5, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Brian Concannon
|
|
|
Brian Concannon, President and Chief Executive |
|
|
Officer (Principal Executive Officer) |
|
exv31w2
EXHIBIT 31.2
CERTIFICATION
I, Christopher Lindop, certify that:
1. |
|
I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Haemonetics Corporation; |
|
2. |
|
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report; |
|
3. |
|
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented
in this report; |
|
4. |
|
The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: |
|
a) |
|
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared; |
|
|
b) |
|
Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such
internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to
provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and
the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles; |
|
|
c) |
|
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and |
|
|
d) |
|
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect the
registrants internal control over financial reporting; and |
5. |
|
The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions): |
|
a) |
|
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely
to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and |
|
|
b) |
|
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting. |
Date: August 5, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Christopher Lindop
|
|
|
Christopher Lindop, Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
and Vice President Business Development (Principal Financial Officer) |
|
exv32w1
EXHIBIT 32.1
Certification Pursuant To
18 USC. Section 1350,
As Adopted Pursuant To
Section 906 of the Sarbanes/Oxley Act of 2002
In connection with the Quarterly Report of Haemonetics Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for
the period ending June 27, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I, Brian Concannon, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, that this Report
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 and that the information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
Date: August 5, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Brian Concannon
|
|
|
Brian Concannon, |
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form
within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided
to Haemonetics and will be retained by Haemonetics and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
exv32w2
EXHIBIT 32.2
Certification Pursuant To
18 USC. Section 1350,
As Adopted Pursuant To
Section 906 of the Sarbanes/Oxley Act of 2002
In connection with the Quarterly Report of Haemonetics Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for
the period ending June 27, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I, Christopher Lindop, Chief Financial Officer and Vice President Business
Development of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18, United
States Code, that this Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in this Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
Date: August 5, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Christopher Lindop
|
|
|
Christopher Lindop, |
|
|
Chief Financial Officer and Vice President Business Development |
|
|
A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form
within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided
to Haemonetics and will be retained by Haemonetics and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.