e10vq
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
|
|
|
|
|
Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
For the quarter ended: September 26, 2009
Commission File Number: 1-14041
HAEMONETICS CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Massachusetts
|
|
04-2882273 |
(State or other jurisdiction
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
of incorporation or organization) |
|
|
400 Wood Road, Braintree, MA 02184
(Address of principal executive offices)
Registrants telephone number, including area code: (781) 848-7100
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1.) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) (2.) has been subject to
the filing requirements for at least the past 90 days.
Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a
non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definition of large accelerated filer,
accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer þ
|
|
Accelerated filer o
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o
|
|
Smaller reporting company o |
|
|
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.)
Yes o No þ
The number of shares of $.01 par value common stock outstanding as of September 26, 2009: 25,611,257
HAEMONETICS CORPORATION
INDEX
1
|
|
|
ITEM 1. |
|
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS |
HAEMONETICS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(Unaudited in thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
Six months ended |
|
|
|
September 26, |
|
|
September 27, |
|
|
September 26, |
|
|
September 27, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Net revenues |
|
$ |
157,070 |
|
|
$ |
145,919 |
|
|
$ |
311,158 |
|
|
$ |
290,035 |
|
Cost of goods sold |
|
|
76,103 |
|
|
|
71,230 |
|
|
|
147,248 |
|
|
|
142,309 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
80,967 |
|
|
|
74,689 |
|
|
|
163,910 |
|
|
|
147,726 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research, development and engineering |
|
|
6,475 |
|
|
|
5,217 |
|
|
|
13,252 |
|
|
|
11,061 |
|
Selling, general and administrative |
|
|
47,469 |
|
|
|
45,863 |
|
|
|
97,308 |
|
|
|
93,722 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
53,944 |
|
|
|
51,080 |
|
|
|
110,560 |
|
|
|
104,783 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
27,023 |
|
|
|
23,609 |
|
|
|
53,350 |
|
|
|
42,943 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(255 |
) |
|
|
(16 |
) |
|
|
(463 |
) |
|
|
(40 |
) |
Interest income |
|
|
103 |
|
|
|
506 |
|
|
|
253 |
|
|
|
1,160 |
|
Other expense, net |
|
|
(801 |
) |
|
|
(1,290 |
) |
|
|
(1,135 |
) |
|
|
(915 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before provision for income taxes |
|
|
26,070 |
|
|
|
22,809 |
|
|
|
52,005 |
|
|
|
43,148 |
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
8,020 |
|
|
|
8,002 |
|
|
|
15,882 |
|
|
|
14,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
18,050 |
|
|
$ |
14,807 |
|
|
$ |
36,123 |
|
|
$ |
29,148 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic income per common share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
0.70 |
|
|
$ |
0.59 |
|
|
$ |
1.41 |
|
|
$ |
1.15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income per common share assuming dilution |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
0.69 |
|
|
$ |
0.57 |
|
|
$ |
1.37 |
|
|
$ |
1.11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
25,685 |
|
|
|
25,038 |
|
|
|
25,671 |
|
|
|
25,323 |
|
Diluted |
|
|
26,321 |
|
|
|
25,917 |
|
|
|
26,273 |
|
|
|
26,218 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements
2
HAEMONETICS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 26, 2009 |
|
|
March 28, 2009 |
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
178,322 |
|
|
$ |
156,721 |
|
Accounts receivable, less allowance of $2,968 at
September 26, 2009 and $2,312 at March 28, 2009 |
|
|
118,668 |
|
|
|
113,598 |
|
Inventories, net |
|
|
77,136 |
|
|
|
76,522 |
|
Deferred tax asset, net |
|
|
10,485 |
|
|
|
7,190 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
21,514 |
|
|
|
28,362 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
406,125 |
|
|
|
382,393 |
|
Property, plant and equipment: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land, building and building improvements |
|
|
45,009 |
|
|
|
42,540 |
|
Plant equipment and machinery |
|
|
109,384 |
|
|
|
108,572 |
|
Office equipment and information technology |
|
|
71,242 |
|
|
|
52,461 |
|
Haemonetics equipment |
|
|
208,904 |
|
|
|
194,290 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total property, plant and equipment |
|
|
434,539 |
|
|
|
397,863 |
|
Less: accumulated depreciation |
|
|
(281,585 |
) |
|
|
(260,056 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net property, plant and equipment |
|
|
152,954 |
|
|
|
137,807 |
|
Other assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other intangibles, less amortization of $29,202 at
September 26, 2009 and $25,508 at March 28, 2009 |
|
|
74,872 |
|
|
|
65,261 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
72,157 |
|
|
|
56,426 |
|
Deferred tax asset, long term |
|
|
2,551 |
|
|
|
3,007 |
|
Other long-term assets |
|
|
5,635 |
|
|
|
4,799 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other assets |
|
|
155,215 |
|
|
|
129,493 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
714,294 |
|
|
$ |
649,693 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes payable and current maturities of long-term debt |
|
$ |
15,181 |
|
|
$ |
695 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
24,804 |
|
|
|
20,652 |
|
Accrued payroll and related costs |
|
|
24,197 |
|
|
|
30,771 |
|
Accrued income taxes |
|
|
7,135 |
|
|
|
2,833 |
|
Deferred tax liability |
|
|
111 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
41,395 |
|
|
|
37,912 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
112,823 |
|
|
|
92,863 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt, net of current maturities |
|
|
4,974 |
|
|
|
5,343 |
|
Long-term deferred tax liability |
|
|
3,702 |
|
|
|
3,129 |
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
13,363 |
|
|
|
8,474 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies (Note 12) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.01 par value; Authorized - 150,000,000 shares; Issued and
outstanding 25,611,257 shares at September 26, 2009 and 25,622,449
shares at March 28, 2009 |
|
|
256 |
|
|
|
256 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
235,792 |
|
|
|
226,829 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
339,323 |
|
|
|
309,516 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
|
|
4,061 |
|
|
|
3,283 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
579,432 |
|
|
|
539,884 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
714,294 |
|
|
$ |
649,693 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
3
HAEMONETICS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY AND OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(Unaudited in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock |
|
|
Paid-in |
|
|
Retained |
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
Stockholders |
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
$s |
|
|
Capital |
|
|
Earnings |
|
|
Income / (Loss) |
|
|
Equity |
|
|
Income |
|
Balance, March 28, 2009 |
|
|
25,622 |
|
|
$ |
256 |
|
|
$ |
226,829 |
|
|
$ |
309,516 |
|
|
$ |
3,283 |
|
|
$ |
539,884 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee stock purchase plan |
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,484 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,484 |
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise of stock options
and related tax benefit |
|
|
95 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,750 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,750 |
|
|
|
|
|
Shares repurchased |
|
|
(140 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,263 |
) |
|
|
(6,316 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,579 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Stock Compensation expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,992 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,992 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36,123 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36,123 |
|
|
$ |
36,123 |
|
Foreign currency translation
adjustment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,055 |
|
|
|
6,055 |
|
|
|
6,055 |
|
Unrealized loss on hedges,
net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,263 |
) |
|
|
(4,263 |
) |
|
|
(4,263 |
) |
Reclassification of hedge gain
to earnings, net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,014 |
) |
|
|
(1,014 |
) |
|
|
(1,014 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
36,901 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, September 26, 2009 |
|
|
25,611 |
|
|
$ |
256 |
|
|
$ |
235,792 |
|
|
$ |
339,323 |
|
|
$ |
4,061 |
|
|
$ |
579,432 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
4
HAEMONETICS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 26, |
|
|
September 27, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Cash Flows from Operating Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
36,123 |
|
|
$ |
29,148 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non cash items: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
20,699 |
|
|
|
18,083 |
|
Stock compensation expense |
|
|
4,992 |
|
|
|
4,542 |
|
Loss on sales of plant, property and equipment |
|
|
147 |
|
|
|
1,102 |
|
Unrealized (gain)/loss from hedging activities |
|
|
(2,145 |
) |
|
|
3,706 |
|
Accretion of interest expense on contingent consideration |
|
|
408 |
|
|
|
|
|
Change in operating assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease/(increase) in accounts receivable, net |
|
|
1,786 |
|
|
|
(7,350 |
) |
Decrease/(increase) in inventories |
|
|
2,071 |
|
|
|
(7,847 |
) |
Decrease/(increase) in prepaid income taxes |
|
|
5,907 |
|
|
|
(267 |
) |
Increase in other assets and other long-term liabilities |
|
|
(1,204 |
) |
|
|
(11,105 |
) |
Tax benefit of exercise of stock options |
|
|
177 |
|
|
|
2,131 |
|
(Decrease)/increase in accounts payable and accrued expenses |
|
|
(7,482 |
) |
|
|
9,634 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
61,479 |
|
|
|
41,777 |
|
Cash Flows from Investing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures on property, plant and equipment |
|
|
(32,880 |
) |
|
|
(28,775 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment |
|
|
383 |
|
|
|
2,497 |
|
Acquisition of SEBRA |
|
|
(12,845 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Acquisition of Neoteric |
|
|
(6,613 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Acquisition of Medicell |
|
|
(307 |
) |
|
|
(2,459 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(52,261 |
) |
|
|
(28,737 |
) |
Cash Flows from Financing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments on long-term real estate mortgage |
|
|
(369 |
) |
|
|
(340 |
) |
Net increase in short-term revolving credit agreements |
|
|
13,578 |
|
|
|
2,100 |
|
Employee stock purchase plan |
|
|
1,484 |
|
|
|
1,396 |
|
Exercise of stock options |
|
|
3,388 |
|
|
|
17,598 |
|
Excess tax benefit on exercise of stock options |
|
|
157 |
|
|
|
5,419 |
|
Share repurchase |
|
|
(6,331 |
) |
|
|
(59,998 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by/(used in) financing activities |
|
|
11,907 |
|
|
|
(33,825 |
) |
Effect of exchange rates on cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
476 |
|
|
|
(1,437 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Increase/(Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents |
|
|
21,601 |
|
|
|
(22,222 |
) |
Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Year |
|
|
156,721 |
|
|
|
133,553 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Period |
|
$ |
178,322 |
|
|
$ |
111,331 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-cash Investing and Financing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transfers from inventory to fixed assets for placements of Haemonetics equipment |
|
$ |
2,809 |
|
|
$ |
4,984 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental Disclosures of Cash Flow Information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest paid |
|
$ |
283 |
|
|
$ |
275 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes paid |
|
$ |
6,360 |
|
|
$ |
7,394 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements
5
1. BASIS OF PRESENTATION
Our accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) in the United States for interim financial
information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly,
they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by GAAP for complete financial
statements. In the opinion of our management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring
accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. All significant
intercompany transactions have been eliminated. Certain reclassifications were made to prior year
balances to conform with the presentation of the financial statements for the six months ended
September 26, 2009. Operating results for the six month period ended September 26, 2009 are not
necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the full fiscal year ending April 3,
2010, or any other interim period. These unaudited consolidated financial statements should be
read in conjunction with our audited consolidated financial statements and footnotes included in
our annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 28, 2009.
Our fiscal year ends on the Saturday closest to the last day of March. Fiscal year 2010 includes
53 weeks with each of the first three quarters having 13 weeks and the fourth quarter having 14
weeks. Fiscal year 2009 included 52 weeks with all four quarters having 13 weeks.
Revenue Recognition
Our revenue recognition policy is to recognize revenues from product sales, software and services
in accordance with ASC Topic 605, Revenue Recognition (formerly known as SAB No. 104, Revenue
Recognition, and as EITF 00-21, Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables), and ASC Topic
985-605, Software (formerly known as Statement of Position 97-2, Software Revenue Recognition, as
amended). These standards require that revenues are recognized when persuasive evidence of an
arrangement exists, product delivery, including customer acceptance, has occurred or services have
been rendered, the price is fixed or determinable and collectibility is reasonably assured. When
more than one element such as equipment, disposables and services are contained in a single
arrangement, we allocate revenue between the elements based on each elements relative fair value,
provided that each element meets the criteria for treatment as a separate unit of accounting. An
item is considered a separate unit of accounting if it has value to the customer on a stand alone
basis and there is objective and reliable evidence of the fair value of the undelivered items. The
fair value of the undelivered elements is determined by the price charged when the element is sold
separately, or in cases when the item is not sold separately, by using vendor specific objective
evidenced under ASC Topic 985-605 or other objective evidence as defined in ASC Topic 605.
Product Revenues
Product sales consist of the sale of our equipment devices and the related disposables used with
these devices. On product sales to end customers, revenue is recognized when both the title and
risk of loss have transferred to the customer as determined by the shipping terms and all
obligations have been completed. Examples of common post delivery obligations are installation and
training. For product sales to distributors, we recognize revenue for both equipment and
disposables upon shipment of these products to our distributors. Our standard contracts with our
distributors state that title to the equipment passes to the distributors at point of shipment to a
distributors location. The distributors are responsible for shipment to the end customer along
with installation, training and acceptance of the equipment by the end customer. All shipments to
distributors are at contract prices and payment is not contingent upon resale of the product.
Software Solutions Revenues
At this time, our software solutions business principally provides support to our plasma and blood
collection customers and hospitals. Through our Haemonetics Software Solutions unit, we provide
information technology platforms and technical support for donor recruitment, blood and plasma
testing laboratories, and for efficient and compliant operations of blood and plasma collection
centers. For plasma customers, we also provide information technology platforms for managing
distribution of plasma from collection centers to plasma fractionation facilities. Software license
revenues are generally billed periodically, monthly or quarterly and recognized for the period for
which the service is provided. Our software solutions business model includes the provision of
services, including in some instances hosting, technical support, and maintenance, for the payment
of periodic, monthly or quarterly fees. We recognize these fees and charges as earned, typically
as these services are provided during the contract period.
6
Subsequent Events
The company has evaluated subsequent events through November 4, 2009 (the date the unaudited
financial statements were issued) and has determined that there were no recognized and no
non-recognized events to be disclosed.
2. RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
In October 2009, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2009-13, Multiple-Deliverable
Revenue Arrangements, an amendment to FASB ASC topic 605, Revenue Recognition, and Update No.
2009-14, Certain Revenue Arrangements That Include Software Elements, an amendment to FASB ASC
subtopic 985-605, Software Revenue Recognition, (the Updates). The Updates provide guidance
on arrangements that include software elements, including tangible products that have software
components that are essential to the functionality of the tangible product and will no longer be
within the scope of the software revenue recognition guidance, and software-enabled products that
will now be subject to other relevant revenue recognition guidance. The Updates provide
authoritative guidance on revenue arrangements with multiple deliverables that are outside the
scope of the software revenue recognition guidance. Under the new guidance, when vendor specific
objective evidence or third party evidence for deliverables in an arrangement cannot be determined,
a best estimate of the selling price is required to separate deliverables and allocate arrangement
consideration using the relative selling price method. The Updates also include new disclosure
requirements on how the application of the relative selling price method affects the timing and
amount of revenue recognition. The Updates must be adopted in the same period using the same
transition method and are effective prospectively, with retrospective adoption permitted, for
revenue arrangements entered into or materially modified in fiscal years beginning on or after June
15, 2010. Early adoption is also permitted; however, early adoption during an interim period
requires retrospective application from the beginning of the fiscal year. The Company is currently
assessing the timing and method of adoption, as well as the possible impact of this guidance on its
financial position and results of operations.
In June 2009, the FASB issued requirements under FASB Statement No. 168, The FASB Accounting
Standards Codification and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles a
replacement of FASB Statement No. 162. The FASB Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) will
become the source of authoritative U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) recognized
by the FASB to be applied by nongovernmental entities. Rules and interpretive releases of the SEC
under authority of federal securities laws are also sources of authoritative GAAP for SEC
registrants. FASB Statement No. 168 is effective for financial statements issued for interim and
annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. This statement became effective during our second
quarter of fiscal year 2010 and its impact is reflected in our financial position and results of
operation for the six months ended September 26, 2009.
Under ASC Topic 805, Business Combinations (formerly known as FASB Statement No. 141(R), Business
Combinations), the FASB requires that all business combinations use the acquisition method
(formerly the purchase method) and that an acquiring entity be identified in all business
combinations. ASC Topic 805 also requires the acquiring entity in a business combination to
recognize all (and only) the assets acquired and liabilities assumed in the transaction;
establishes the acquisition-date fair value as the measurement objective for all assets acquired
and liabilities assumed; and requires the acquirer to disclose to investors and other users all of
the information they need to evaluate and understand the nature and financial effect of the
business combination. This statement became effective for our fiscal year 2010 and its impact is
reflected in our financial position and results of operations for the six months ended September
26, 2009. The Companys acquisition of LAttitude Medical Systems, Inc. (Neoteric) and asset
acquisition of the blood collection and processing business unit (SEBRA) of Engineering and
Research Associates, Inc. during the first six months of fiscal year 2010 were both accounted for
in accordance to the requirements of ASC Topic 805 see Note 9.
7
3. EARNINGS PER SHARE (EPS)
The following table provides a reconciliation of the numerators and denominators of the basic and
diluted earnings per share computations. Basic EPS is computed by dividing net income by weighted
average shares outstanding. Diluted EPS includes the effect of potentially dilutive common shares.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 26, |
|
|
September 27, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(in thousands, except per share amounts) |
|
Basic EPS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
18,050 |
|
|
$ |
14,807 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares |
|
|
25,685 |
|
|
|
25,038 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic income per share |
|
$ |
0.70 |
|
|
$ |
0.59 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted EPS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
18,050 |
|
|
$ |
14,807 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic weighted average shares |
|
|
25,685 |
|
|
|
25,038 |
|
Net effect of common stock equivalents |
|
|
636 |
|
|
|
879 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted weighted average shares |
|
|
26,321 |
|
|
|
25,917 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted income per share |
|
$ |
0.69 |
|
|
$ |
0.57 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 26, |
|
|
September 27, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(in thousands, except per share amounts) |
|
Basic EPS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
36,123 |
|
|
$ |
29,148 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares |
|
|
25,671 |
|
|
|
25,323 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic income per share |
|
$ |
1.41 |
|
|
$ |
1.15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted EPS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
36,123 |
|
|
$ |
29,148 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic weighted average shares |
|
|
25,671 |
|
|
|
25,323 |
|
Net effect of common stock equivalents |
|
|
601 |
|
|
|
895 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted weighted average shares |
|
|
26,273 |
|
|
|
26,218 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted income per share |
|
$ |
1.37 |
|
|
$ |
1.11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding, assuming dilution, excludes the impact of 0.8 million stock
options for both the second quarter and first six months of fiscal year 2010 and 0.4 million stock
options for both the second quarter and first six months of fiscal year 2009 because these
securities were anti-dilutive during the noted periods.
4. STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION
Stock-based compensation expense of $5.0 and $4.5 million was recognized for the six months ended
September 26, 2009 and September 27, 2008, respectively. The related income tax benefit recognized was $1.5 and
$1.3 million for the six months ended September 26, 2009 and September 27, 2008, respectively. We recognize
stock-based compensation on a straight line basis.
8
For a more detailed description of our stock-based compensation plans, see Note 11Capital Stock
to the Companys consolidated financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the year ended March 28, 2009. Our stock-based compensation plans currently consist of stock
options, restricted stock awards, restricted stock units and an employee stock purchase plan.
Options become exercisable in the manner specified by the Compensation Committee of our Board of
Directors. All options, restricted stock awards and restricted stock units granted to employees in
the six months ended September 26, 2009 vest over a four year period of time and the options expire
not more than 7 years from the date of grant.
Cash flows relating to the benefits of tax deductions in excess of compensation cost recognized are
reported as a financing cash flow, rather than as an operating cash flow. This excess tax benefit
was $0.1 million and $4.1 million for the three months ended September 26, 2009 and September 27,
2008, respectively, and $0.2 million and $5.4 million for the six months ended September 26, 2009
and September 27, 2008, respectively.
A summary of information related to stock options is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
Aggregate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Intrinsic |
|
|
|
Options |
|
|
Exercise |
|
|
Remaining |
|
|
Value |
|
|
|
Outstanding |
|
|
Price |
|
|
Life (Years) |
|
|
($000s) |
|
Outstanding at March 28, 2009 |
|
|
3,054,724 |
|
|
$ |
42.54 |
|
|
|
4.23 |
|
|
$ |
37,601 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
|
32,845 |
|
|
|
55.37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised |
|
|
(32,462 |
) |
|
|
28.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(6,716 |
) |
|
|
49.75 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at June 27, 2009 |
|
|
3,048,391 |
|
|
$ |
42.82 |
|
|
|
4.03 |
|
|
$ |
43,917 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
|
52,594 |
|
|
|
59.27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised |
|
|
(62,728 |
) |
|
|
39.13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(24,516 |
) |
|
|
51.83 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at September 26, 2009 |
|
|
3,013,741 |
|
|
$ |
43.11 |
|
|
|
3.75 |
|
|
$ |
38,595 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at September 26, 2009 |
|
|
2,152,545 |
|
|
$ |
39.05 |
|
|
|
3.13 |
|
|
$ |
36,133 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vested or expected to vest at
September 26, 2009 |
|
|
2,830,088 |
|
|
$ |
42.48 |
|
|
|
3.66 |
|
|
$ |
38,006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The total intrinsic value of options exercised during the three month periods ended September 26,
2009 and September 27, 2008, was $1.0 million and $16.4 million, respectively, and $1.6 million and
$22.6 million for the six month periods ended September 26, 2009 and September 27, 2008,
respectively.
As of September 26, 2009 and September 27, 2008, there was $9.1 million and $11.0 million,
respectively, of total unrecognized compensation cost related to non vested stock options. That
cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 2.3 years and 1.9
years, respectively. The total fair value of shares fully vested during the six months ended
September 26, 2009 was $18.0 million and during the six months ended September 27, 2008
was $26.6 million.
9
The weighted average fair value for our options granted in the first six months of fiscal year 2010 and 2009 was $17.54
and $18.07, respectively. The assumptions utilized for option grants during the periods presented are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
September 26, |
|
September 27, |
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
Stock Options Black-Scholes assumptions (weighted average): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Volatility |
|
|
28.29 |
% |
|
|
29.07 |
% |
Expected life (years) |
|
|
4.9 |
|
|
|
4.9 |
|
Risk-free interest rate |
|
|
2.71 |
% |
|
|
3.26 |
% |
Dividend yield |
|
|
0.00 |
% |
|
|
0.00 |
% |
As of September 26, 2009 and September 27, 2008, there was $0.2 and $0.4 million,
respectively, of total unrecognized compensation cost related to non vested restricted stock
awards. That cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 1.6 years and 2.2 years, respectively. The total fair value of restricted stock awards vested was
$0.0 million for the six months ended September 26, 2009 and $0.1 million for the six months ended
September 27, 2008.
A summary of information related to restricted stock awards is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grant Date |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
Nonvested at March 28, 2009 |
|
|
10,956 |
|
|
$ |
50.97 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Released |
|
|
(2,500 |
) |
|
$ |
48.09 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonvested at June 27, 2009 |
|
|
8,456 |
|
|
$ |
51.82 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canceled |
|
|
(3,456 |
) |
|
$ |
57.22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonvested at September 26, 2009 |
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
$ |
48.09 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 26, 2009 and September 27, 2008, there was $3.6 million and $2.1 million,
respectively, of total unrecognized compensation cost related to non vested restricted stock units.
That cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 2.3 years and 3.0 years,
respectively. The total fair value of shares fully vested was $0.2 million and $0.1 million for
the six months ended September 26, 2009 and September 27, 2008, respectively.
10
A summary of information related to restricted stock units is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Market Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
at Grant Date |
|
|
|
|
|
Nonvested at March 28, 2009 |
|
|
102,302 |
|
|
$ |
53.48 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
|
2,501 |
|
|
$ |
54.09 |
|
Vested |
|
|
(289 |
) |
|
$ |
52.69 |
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(598 |
) |
|
$ |
52.66 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonvested at June 27, 2009 |
|
|
103,916 |
|
|
$ |
53.50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
|
6,716 |
|
|
$ |
58.98 |
|
Vested |
|
|
(3,324 |
) |
|
$ |
59.11 |
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(2,639 |
) |
|
$ |
51.89 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonvested at September 26, 2009 |
|
|
104,669 |
|
|
$ |
53.88 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 26, 2009 and September 27, 2008, there was $0.2 million and $0.3 million,
respectively, of total unrecognized compensation expense, net of estimated forfeitures, related to
the Employee Stock Purchase Plan (ESPP) shares. That cost is expected to be recognized over the
remainder of fiscal year 2010 and fiscal year 2009, respectively.
During the six months ended September 26, 2009 and September 27, 2008, there were 33,183 and 31,474
shares purchased under the ESPP, respectively. They were purchased at $43.89 and $44.35
per share under the ESPP, respectively.
5. ACCOUNTING FOR SHIPPING AND HANDLING COSTS
Shipping and handling costs are included in cost of goods sold with the exception of $5.9 million
and $4.4 million for the six months ended September 26, 2009 and September 27, 2008, respectively,
that are included in selling, general, and administrative expenses. Freight is classified in cost
of goods sold when the customer is charged for freight and in selling, general and administration
when the customer is not explicitly charged for freight.
6. PRODUCT WARRANTIES
We provide a warranty on parts and labor for one year after the sale and installation of each
device. We also warrant our disposables products through their use or expiration. We estimate our
potential warranty expense based on our historical warranty experience, and we periodically assess
the adequacy of our warranty accrual and make adjustments as necessary.
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended |
|
|
|
September 26, |
|
|
September 27, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Warranty accrual as of the beginning of the period |
|
$ |
1,875 |
|
|
$ |
960 |
|
Warranty provision |
|
|
242 |
|
|
|
341 |
|
Warranty spending |
|
|
(392 |
) |
|
|
(309 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warranty accrual as of the end of the period |
|
$ |
1,725 |
|
|
$ |
992 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the six months ended |
|
|
|
September 26, |
|
|
September 27, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Warranty accrual as of the beginning of the period |
|
$ |
1,835 |
|
|
$ |
929 |
|
Warranty provision |
|
|
633 |
|
|
|
876 |
|
Warranty spending |
|
|
(743 |
) |
|
|
(813 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warranty accrual as of the end of the period |
|
$ |
1,725 |
|
|
$ |
992 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7. COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
Comprehensive income is the total of net income and all other non-owner changes in stockholders
equity. Other non-owner changes are primarily foreign currency translation, the change in our net
minimum pension liability, and the changes in fair value of the effective portion of our
outstanding cash flow hedge contracts.
A summary of the components of other comprehensive income is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended |
|
(In thousands) |
|
September 26, 2009 |
|
|
September 27, 2008 |
|
Net income |
|
$ |
18,050 |
|
|
$ |
14,807 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation |
|
|
3,424 |
|
|
|
(4,153 |
) |
Unrealized (loss)/gain on cash flow hedges, net of tax |
|
|
(3,255 |
) |
|
|
1,783 |
|
Reclassifications into earnings of cash flow hedge losses, net of tax |
|
|
106 |
|
|
|
1,345 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income |
|
$ |
18,325 |
|
|
$ |
13,782 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the six months ended |
|
(In thousands) |
|
September 26, 2009 |
|
|
September 27, 2008 |
|
Net income |
|
$ |
36,123 |
|
|
$ |
29,148 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation |
|
|
6,055 |
|
|
|
(5,655 |
) |
Unrealized (loss)/gain on cash flow hedges, net of tax |
|
|
(4,263 |
) |
|
|
4,690 |
|
Reclassifications into earnings of cash flow hedge
(gains)/losses, net of tax |
|
|
(1,014 |
) |
|
|
3,938 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income |
|
$ |
36,901 |
|
|
$ |
32,121 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8. INVENTORIES
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market and include the cost of material, labor and
manufacturing overhead. Cost is determined on the first-in, first-out method.
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 26, 2009 |
|
|
March 28, 2009 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Raw materials |
|
$ |
25,993 |
|
|
$ |
23,778 |
|
Work-in-process |
|
|
4,902 |
|
|
|
8,732 |
|
Finished goods |
|
|
46,241 |
|
|
|
44,012 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
77,136 |
|
|
$ |
76,522 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13
9. GOODWILL, OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS, AND ACQUISITIONS
Goodwill
The change in the carrying amount of our goodwill during the six months ended September 26, 2009 is as follows
(in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying amount as of March 28, 2009 |
|
$ |
56,426 |
|
SEBRA (a) |
|
|
5,272 |
|
LAttitude Medical Systems Inc. (Neoteric) (b) |
|
|
8,409 |
|
Altivation Software Inc. (c) |
|
|
523 |
|
Medicell Ltd. (d) |
|
|
583 |
|
Effect of change in rates used for translation |
|
|
944 |
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying amount as of September 26, 2009 |
|
$ |
72,157 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
A description of the acquisition of SEBRA®, which occurred on September 4, 2009, is included later
in this footnote. |
|
(b) |
|
A description of the acquisition of LAttitude Medical Systems, Inc. (Neoteric), which occurred
on April 16, 2009, is included later in this footnote. |
|
(c) |
|
See Note 3, Acquisitions, in our fiscal year 2009 Form 10-K for a full description of the acquisition
of Altivation Software (Altivation), which occurred on March 27, 2009. |
|
(d) |
|
See Note 3, Acqusitions, in our fiscal year 2009 Form 10-K for a full description of the acquisition
of Medicell Ltd. (Medicell), which occurred on April 4, 2008. |
Other Intangible Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
Gross Carrying |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
Useful Life |
|
As of September 26, 2009 |
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
(in years) |
|
Patents |
|
$ |
12,107 |
|
|
$ |
5,455 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
Capitalized software |
|
|
21,487 |
|
|
|
749 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
Other technology |
|
|
39,016 |
|
|
|
12,729 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
Customer contracts and related relationships |
|
|
30,350 |
|
|
|
9,859 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
Trade names |
|
|
1,114 |
|
|
|
410 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total intangibles |
|
$ |
104,074 |
|
|
$ |
29,202 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
Gross Carrying |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
Useful Life |
|
As of March 28, 2009 |
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
(in years) |
|
Patents |
|
$ |
12,008 |
|
|
$ |
4,945 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
Capitalized software |
|
|
18,994 |
|
|
|
572 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
Other technology |
|
|
28,784 |
|
|
|
11,501 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
Customer contracts and related relationships |
|
|
29,886 |
|
|
|
8,240 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
Trade names |
|
|
1,097 |
|
|
|
250 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total intangibles |
|
$ |
90,769 |
|
|
$ |
25,508 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On September 4, 2009, Haemonetics acquired the assets of the blood collection and processing
business unit (SEBRA) of Engineering and Research Associates, Inc., a leading provider of blood
and medical manufacturing technologies. SEBRA products, which include tubing sealers, blood
shakers, sterile connection systems, mobile lounges and ancillary products used
14
in blood collection and processing, complement Haemonetics portfolio and add even greater depth to
Haemonetics Blood Bank and Plasma product lines. The acquisition will give Haemonetics entry into
the whole blood collection market, an important strategic position as Haemonetics prepares to enter
this market with an automated whole blood collection system in early calendar 2011. The purchase
price was $12.8 million.
The purchase price was allocated to other intangible assets of $5.3 million, trade accounts
receivables of $1.0 million, inventory of $1.2 million, and goodwill of $5.3 million. The Company
is still in the process of evaluating the information necessary to determine the fair value of the
assets and liabilities acquired. The preliminary purchase price allocation will be finalized once
the Company has completed this evaluation, which will occur not later than one year from the
acquisition date. The results of the SEBRA operations are included in our consolidated results for
periods after the acquisition.
On April 16, 2009, Haemonetics acquired the outstanding shares of LAttitude Medical Systems Inc.
(Neoteric). Neoteric is a medical information management company that markets a full end-to-end
suite of products to track, allocate, release, and dispense hospital blood units while controlling
inventory and recording the disposition of blood. The acquisition strategically broadened
Haemonetics blood management solutions. The purchase price was $6.7 million plus contingent
consideration.
The contingent consideration is based upon annual revenue growth for the three years following the
acquisition, at established profitability thresholds. Using projected revenues for fiscal years
2010, 2011, and 2012, an analysis was performed that probability weighted three performance
outcomes for the noted years. The performance outcomes were then discounted using a discount rate
commensurate with the risks associated with Neoteric to arrive at a recorded $5.0 million fair
value for the contingent consideration.
The contingent consideration is based upon future operating performance and is not contractually
limited. The purchase price was allocated to other intangible assets of $5.0 million, deferred tax
liabilities of $1.6 million, and goodwill of $8.4 million. The Company is still in the process of
evaluating the information necessary to determine the fair value of the assets and liabilities
acquired. The preliminary purchase price allocation will be finalized once the Company has
completed this evaluation, which will occur not later than one year from the acquisition date. The
results of the Neoteric operations are included in our consolidated results for periods after the
acquisition and $0.4 million of interest expense has been recorded relating to the accretion of the
noted contingent consideration for the first six months of fiscal year 2010.
In addition to the acquisition of SEBRA and Neoteric discussed above, changes to the net carrying
value of our intangible assets from March 28, 2009 to September 26, 2009, reflect the
capitalization of software costs associated with our devices and software products (see Note 16),
amortization expense and the effect of exchange rate changes in the translation of our intangible
assets held by our international subsidiaries.
Amortization expense for amortized intangible assets was $1.8 million and $1.5 million for the
three months ended September 26, 2009 and September 27, 2008, respectively, and $3.6 and $3.0 for
the six months ended September 26, 2009 and September 27, 2008, respectively. Annual amortization
expense is expected to approximate $8.1 million for fiscal year 2010, $8.1 million for fiscal year
2011, $7.6 million for fiscal year 2012, $7.5 million for fiscal year 2013, and $8.1 million for
fiscal year 2014.
10. DERIVATIVES AND FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
We manufacture, market and sell our products globally. Approximately 52% of our sales are generated
outside the U.S. in local currencies. We also incur certain manufacturing, marketing and selling
costs in international markets in local currency. Accordingly, our earnings and cash flows are
exposed to market risk from changes in foreign currency exchange rates relative to the U.S. dollar,
our reporting currency.
We have a program in place that is designed to mitigate our exposure to changes in foreign currency
exchange rates. That program includes the use of derivative financial instruments to minimize for
a period of time, the unforeseen impact on our financial results from changes in foreign exchange
rates. We utilize forward foreign currency contracts to hedge the anticipated cash flows from
transactions denominated in foreign currencies, primarily the Japanese Yen and the Euro, and to
lesser extent the Great British Pound Sterling and the Canadian Dollar. This does not eliminate
the volatility of foreign exchange rates, but because we generally enter into forward contracts one
year out, rates are fixed for a one-year period, thereby facilitating financial planning and
resource allocation.
15
Designated Foreign Currency Hedge Contracts
All of our designated foreign currency hedge contracts as of September 26, 2009 and March 28, 2009
were cash flow hedges under ASC Topic 815, Derivatives and Hedging (formerly known as FASB
Statement No. 133). We record the effective portion of any change in the fair value of designated
foreign currency hedge contracts in other comprehensive income (OCI) in the Statement of
Stockholders Equity until the related third-party transaction occurs. Once the related
third-party transaction occurs, we reclassify the effective portion of any related gain or loss on
the designated foreign currency hedge contracts to earnings. In the event the hedged forecasted
transaction does not occur, or it becomes probable that it will not occur, we would reclassify the
amount of any gain or loss on the related cash flow hedge to earnings at that time. We had
designated foreign currency hedge contracts outstanding in the contract amount of $131.6 million as
of September 26, 2009 and $117.4 million as of March 28, 2009.
During the second quarter of fiscal year 2010, we recognized net gains of $1.0 million in earnings
on our cash flow hedges. All currency cash flow hedges outstanding as of September 26, 2009 mature
within twelve months. For the quarter ended September 26, 2009, $4.3 million of losses, net of
tax, were recorded in OCI to recognize the effective portion of the fair value of any designated
foreign currency hedge contracts that are, or previously were, designated as foreign currency cash
flow hedges, as compared to net gains of $4.7 million as of September 27, 2008. For the quarter
ended September 26, 2009, $4.3 million of losses, net of tax, may be reclassified to earnings
within the next twelve months.
Non-designated Foreign Currency Contracts
We manage our exposure to changes in foreign currency on a consolidated basis to take advantage of
offsetting transactions and balances. We use currency forward contracts as a part of our strategy
to manage exposure related to foreign currency denominated monetary assets and liabilities. These
currency forward contracts are not designated as cash flow or fair value hedges under ASC Topic
815. These forward contracts are marked-to-market with changes in fair value recorded to earnings;
and are entered into for periods consistent with currency transaction exposures, generally one
month. We had non-designated foreign currency hedge contracts under Statement No. 133 outstanding
in the contract amount of $37.8 million as of September 26, 2009 and $51.6 million as of March 28,
2009.
Fair Value of Derivative Instruments
The following table presents the effect of our derivative instruments designated as cash flow
hedges and those not designated as hedging instruments under ASC Topic 815 in our consolidated
statement of income for the six months ended September 26, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of Gain |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of Loss |
|
|
Reclassified |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recognized |
|
|
from OCI into |
|
|
Location in |
|
|
Excluded from |
|
|
Location in |
|
|
|
in OCI |
|
|
Earnings |
|
|
Statement of |
|
|
Effectiveness |
|
|
Statement of |
|
Derivative Instruments |
|
(Effective Portion) |
|
|
(Effective Portion) |
|
|
Operations |
|
|
Testing (*) |
|
|
Operations |
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Designated foreign currency hedge contracts |
|
$ |
(4,263 |
) |
|
$ |
1,014 |
|
|
Net revenues |
|
$ |
410 |
|
|
Other income |
Non-designated foreign currency hedge contracts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,385 |
) |
|
Other expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(4,263 |
) |
|
$ |
1,014 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(1,975 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(*) |
|
We exclude the difference between the spot rate and hedge forward rate from our effectiveness testing. |
We did not have fair value hedges or net investment hedges outstanding as of September 26, 2009 or March 28, 2009.
ASC Topic 815 requires all derivative instruments to be recognized at their fair values as either
assets or liabilities on the balance sheet. We determine the fair value of our derivative
instruments using the framework prescribed by ASC Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements and
Disclosures (formerly known as FASB Statement No. 157, Fair Value Measurements), by considering the
estimated amount we would receive or pay to sell or transfer these instruments at the reporting
date and by taking into account current interest rates, currency exchange rates, the
creditworthiness of the counterparty for assets, and our creditworthiness for liabilities. In
certain instances, we may utilize financial models to measure fair value. Generally, we use inputs
that include quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for
identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active; other observable inputs
for the asset or liability; and inputs derived principally
16
from, or corroborated by, observable market data by correlation or other means. As of September
26, 2009, we have classified our derivative assets and liabilities within Level 2 of the fair value
hierarchy prescribed by ASC Topic 815, as discussed below, because these observable inputs are
available for substantially the full term of our derivative instruments.
The following tables present the fair value of our derivative instruments as they appear in our consolidated balance
sheets as of September 26, 2009 by type of contract and whether it is a qualifying hedge under Statement No. 133.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Location in |
|
|
Balance as of |
|
|
Balance as of |
|
(in thousands) |
|
Balance Sheet |
|
|
September 26, 2009 |
|
|
March 28, 2009 |
|
Derivative Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Designated foreign currency hedge contracts |
|
Other current assets |
|
$ |
1,494 |
|
|
$ |
3,936 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,494 |
|
|
$ |
3,936 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Designated foreign currency hedge contracts |
|
Other accrued liabilities |
|
$ |
7,099 |
|
|
$ |
2,914 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
7,099 |
|
|
$ |
2,914 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Fair Value Measurements
We adopted ASC Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (formerly known as FASB Statement
No. 157, Fair Value Measurement) as of March 30, 2008. ASC Topic 820 defines fair value,
establishes a framework for measuring fair value in accordance with U.S. GAAP, and expands
disclosures about fair value measurements. ASC Topic 820 does not require any new fair value
measurements; rather, it applies to other accounting pronouncements that require or permit fair
value measurements. In accordance with ASC Topic 820, for the six months ended September 26, 2009,
we applied the requirements under ASC Topic 820 to our non-financial assets and non-financial
liabilities. As we did not have an impairment of any non-financial assets or non-financial
liabilities, there was no disclosure required relating to our non-financial assets or non-financial
liabilities.
On a recurring basis, we measure certain financial assets and financial liabilities at fair value,
including our money market funds, foreign currency derivative contracts, and contingent
consideration. ASC Topic 820 defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an
asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the
measurement date. As such, fair value is a market-based measurement that should be determined
based on assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability. We base
fair value upon quoted market prices, where available. Where quoted market prices or other
observable inputs are not available, we apply valuation techniques to estimate fair value.
ASC Topic 820 establishes a three-level valuation hierarchy for disclosure of fair value
measurements. The categorization of assets and liabilities within the valuation hierarchy is based
upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the measurement of fair value. The three
levels of the hierarchy are defined as follows:
|
|
|
Level 1 Inputs to the valuation methodology are quoted market prices for identical
assets or liabilities. |
|
|
|
|
Level 2 Inputs to the valuation methodology are other observable inputs, including
quoted market prices for similar assets or liabilities and market-corroborated inputs. |
|
|
|
|
Level 3 Inputs to the valuation methodology are unobservable inputs based on
managements best estimate of inputs market participants would use in pricing the asset or
liability at the measurement date, including assumptions about risk. |
Our money market funds carried at fair value are generally classified within Level 1 of the fair
value hierarchy because they are valued using quoted market prices.
We recognize all derivative financial instruments in our consolidated financial statements at fair
value in accordance with ASC Topic 815, Derivatives and Hedging (formerly known as FASB Statement
No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities). We determine the fair
value of these instruments using the framework prescribed by ASC Topic 820 by considering the
estimated amount we would receive or pay to terminate these agreements at the reporting date and by
taking into account current spot rates, the creditworthiness of the counterparty for assets, and
our
17
creditworthiness for liabilities. We have classified our foreign currency hedge contracts within
Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy because these observable inputs are available for substantially
the full term of our derivative instruments. For the quarter ended September 26, 2009, we have
classified our other liabilities contingent consideration relating to our acquisition of
Neoteric within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy because the value is determined using
significant unobservable inputs.
Fair Value Measured on a Recurring Basis
Financial assets and financial liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis consist of the following as of
September 26, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted Market |
|
|
Significant Other |
|
|
Significant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prices for |
|
|
Observable |
|
|
Unobservable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Identical Assets |
|
|
Inputs |
|
|
Inputs |
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
(Level 1) |
|
|
(Level 2) |
|
|
(Level 3) |
|
|
Total |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Money market funds |
|
$ |
152,376 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
152,376 |
|
Forward currency exchange contracts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,494 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,494 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
152,376 |
|
|
$ |
1,494 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
153,870 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forward currency exchange contracts |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
7,099 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
7,099 |
|
Other liabilities contingent consideration |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,396 |
|
|
|
5,396 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
7,099 |
|
|
$ |
5,396 |
|
|
$ |
12,495 |
|
|
|
|
A description of the methods used to determine the fair value of the Level 3 liabilities (other
liabilities contingent consideration) is included within Note 9 Goodwill, Other Intangible
Assets, and Acquisitions. The table below provides a reconciliation of the beginning and ending
Level 3 liabilities for the six months ended September 26, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
|
Measurements |
|
|
|
Using Significant |
|
|
|
Unobservable |
|
|
|
Inputs |
|
(in thousands) |
|
(Level 3) |
|
Beginning balance |
|
$ |
|
|
Transfers into Level 3 |
|
|
4,988 |
|
Change in value |
|
|
408 |
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance |
|
$ |
5,396 |
|
|
|
|
|
Statement No. 159
In February 2007, the FASB issued ASC Topic 825, Financial Instruments (formerly known as FASB
Statement No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities, including
an amendment of FASB Statement No. 115) which allows an entity to elect to record financial assets
and financial liabilities at fair value upon their initial recognition on a contract-by-contract
basis. We adopted ASC Topic 825 as of March 30, 2008 and did not elect the fair value option for
our eligible financial assets and financial liabilities.
Other Fair Value Disclosures
The fair value of our long-term debt obligations was $5.6 million and $6.5 million at September 26,
2009 and September 27, 2008, respectively.
18
11. INCOME TAXES
Our reported tax rate includes two principal components: an expected effective annual tax rate and
discrete items resulting in additional provisions or benefits that are recorded in the quarter that
an event arises. Events or items that give rise to discrete recognition include finalizing audit
examinations for open tax years or a statute of limitations expiration.
The reported tax rate was 30.8% for the three months ended September 26, 2009. The reported tax
rate includes:
|
|
Our expected annual effective tax rate of 31.1%, comprised of the U.S. federal statutory tax
rate of 35.0% reduced by tax benefits from foreign taxes (including our Swiss principal) and a
domestic manufacturing deduction, plus the state tax provision, and stock compensation
expenses not deductible in all jurisdictions; and |
The following discrete items:
|
|
A $0.7 million benefit (on an annual basis) from the remittance of Japanese
earnings. |
|
|
|
A $0.1 million cost from foreign tax assessments. |
The reported tax rate was 35.1% for the three months ended September 27, 2008. The reported tax
rate equaled the expected effective annual tax rate which reflected tax benefits from foreign taxes
and a domestic manufacturing deduction, offset in part by the state tax provision, and stock
compensation expense not deductible in all jurisdictions.
The reported tax rate was 30.5% for the six months ended September 26, 2009. The reported tax rate
includes:
|
|
Our expected annual effective tax rate of 31.1%, comprised of the U.S. federal statutory rate
of 35.0% reduced by tax benefits from foreign taxes (including our Swiss principal) and a
domestic manufacturing deduction, plus the state tax provision, and stock compensation
expenses not deductible in all jurisdictions; and |
The following discrete items:
|
|
A $0.7 million benefit (on an annual basis) from the remittance of Japanese
earnings. |
|
|
A $0.1 million cost from foreign tax assessments. |
The reported tax rate was 32.4% for the six months ended September 27, 2008. The reported tax rate
included:
|
|
A 35.1% expected effective annual tax rate which reflects tax benefits from foreign taxes and
a domestic manufacturing deduction, offset in part by the state tax provision, and stock
compensation expenses not deductible in all jurisdictions. The reported tax rate also
included a $1.1 million reversal of previously accrued income taxes because of the expiration
of the statute of limitations. |
We conduct business globally and, as a result, file consolidated federal and separate state and
foreign income tax returns in multiple jurisdictions. In the normal course of business, we are
subject to examination by taxing authorities throughout the world in jurisdictions including the
U.S., Japan, Germany, France, the United Kingdom, and Switzerland. With few exceptions, we are no
longer subject to U.S. federal, state and local, or foreign income tax examinations for years
before 2006.
12. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
We are presently engaged in various legal actions, and although ultimate liability cannot be
determined at the present time, we believe, based on consultation with counsel, that any such
liability will not materially affect our consolidated financial position or our results of
operations.
13. DEFINED BENEFIT PENSION PLANS
Certain of the Companys foreign subsidiaries have defined benefit pension plans covering
substantially all full time employees at those subsidiaries. Net periodic benefit costs for the
plans in the aggregate include the following components:
19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended |
|
|
|
September 26, 2009 |
|
|
September 27, 2008 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Service cost |
|
$ |
124 |
|
|
$ |
150 |
|
Interest cost on benefit obligation |
|
|
61 |
|
|
|
66 |
|
Expected return on plan assets |
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
(19 |
) |
Amortization of unrecognized prior service cost, unrecognized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
gain and unrecognized initial obligation |
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic benefit cost |
|
$ |
160 |
|
|
$ |
193 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the six months ended |
|
|
|
September 26, 2009 |
|
|
September 27, 2008 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Service cost |
|
$ |
248 |
|
|
$ |
300 |
|
Interest cost on benefit obligation |
|
|
122 |
|
|
|
132 |
|
Expected return on plan assets |
|
|
(30 |
) |
|
|
(38 |
) |
Amortization of unrecognized prior service cost, unrecognized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
gain and unrecognized initial obligation |
|
|
(20 |
) |
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic benefit cost |
|
$ |
320 |
|
|
$ |
386 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14. SEGMENT INFORMATION
Segment Definition Criteria
We manage our business on the basis of one operating segment: the design, manufacture and marketing
of automated blood processing systems. Our chief operating decision-maker uses consolidated results
to make operating and strategic decisions. Manufacturing processes, as well as the regulatory
environment in which we operate, are largely the same for all product lines.
Enterprise Wide Disclosures about Product and Services
We have three families of products: (1) disposables, (2) software solutions and (3) equipment &
other.
Disposables include the plasma, blood bank, and hospital product lines. Plasma consists of the
disposables used to perform apheresis for the separation of whole blood components and subsequent
collection of plasma. Blood bank consists of disposables which separate whole blood for the
subsequent collection of platelets, red cells, or a combination of red cells and plasma. Hospital
consists of surgical disposables (principally the Cell Saver® autologous blood recovery system and
cardioPAT® cardiovascular perioperative autotransfusion system), OrthoPAT® orthopedic perioperative
autotransfusion system, and diagnostics products (principally the TEG® Thrombelastograph®
hemostasis analyzer).
Software solutions include information technology platforms that assist blood banks, plasma
centers, and hospitals more effectively manage regulatory compliance and operational efficiency.
Equipment & other revenues include revenue from equipment sales, repairs performed under preventive
maintenance contracts or emergency service visits, spare part sales, and various service and
training programs.
20
Revenues from External Customers:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 26, 2009 |
|
|
September 27, 2008 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Disposable revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plasma disposables |
|
$ |
59,423 |
|
|
$ |
49,924 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Blood bank disposables |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Platelet |
|
|
37,250 |
|
|
|
36,294 |
|
Red cell |
|
|
11,484 |
|
|
|
11,758 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48,734 |
|
|
|
48,052 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hospital disposables |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Surgical |
|
|
16,631 |
|
|
|
15,984 |
|
OrthoPAT |
|
|
8,678 |
|
|
|
8,393 |
|
Diagnostics |
|
|
4,282 |
|
|
|
4,763 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29,591 |
|
|
|
29,140 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disposables revenue |
|
|
137,748 |
|
|
|
127,116 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Software solutions |
|
|
9,100 |
|
|
|
7,079 |
|
Equipment & other |
|
|
10,222 |
|
|
|
11,724 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
$ |
157,070 |
|
|
$ |
145,919 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 26, 2009 |
|
|
September 27, 2008 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Disposable revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plasma disposables |
|
$ |
118,293 |
|
|
$ |
96,792 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Blood bank disposables |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Platelet |
|
|
71,557 |
|
|
|
71,953 |
|
Red cell |
|
|
23,263 |
|
|
|
23,600 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
94,820 |
|
|
|
95,553 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hospital disposables |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Surgical |
|
|
34,056 |
|
|
|
33,253 |
|
OrthoPAT |
|
|
17,262 |
|
|
|
17,189 |
|
Diagnostics |
|
|
9,279 |
|
|
|
9,857 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60,597 |
|
|
|
60,299 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disposables revenue |
|
|
273,710 |
|
|
|
252,644 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Software solutions |
|
|
17,554 |
|
|
|
14,337 |
|
Equipment & other |
|
|
19,894 |
|
|
|
23,054 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
$ |
311,158 |
|
|
$ |
290,035 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15. REORGANIZATION
During the last two years, the Company has transformed aspects of its international businesses, and
more recently, its U.S. domestic Technical Operations organizations. The following summarizes the
restructuring activity for the six months ended September 26, 2009 and September 27, 2008,
respectively:
21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended September 26, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrual |
|
|
|
Balance at |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset |
|
|
Balance at |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
March 28, 2009 |
|
|
Cost Incurred |
|
|
Payments |
|
|
Write down |
|
|
September 26, 2009 |
|
Employee-related costs |
|
$ |
2,730 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(967 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,763 |
|
Facility related costs |
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(42 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other exit & termination costs |
|
|
78 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(78 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,850 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(1,087 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,763 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended September 27, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrual |
|
|
|
Balance at |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset |
|
|
Balance at |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
March 29, 2008 |
|
|
Cost Incurred |
|
|
Payments |
|
|
Write down |
|
|
September 27, 2008 |
|
Employee-related costs |
|
$ |
521 |
|
|
$ |
1,988 |
|
|
$ |
(1,498 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,011 |
|
Facility related costs |
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
71 |
|
|
|
(71 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
42 |
|
Other exit & termination costs |
|
|
78 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
78 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
641 |
|
|
$ |
2,059 |
|
|
$ |
(1,569 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,131 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16. CAPITALIZATION OF SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT COSTS
The Company implemented an Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) system over the last three years.
The cost of software that is developed or obtained for internal use is accounted for pursuant to
ASC Topic 350, Intangibles Goodwill and Other (formerly known as AICPA Statement of Position
98-1, Accounting for the Costs of Computer Software Developed or Obtained for Internal Use).
Pursuant to ASC Topic 350, the Company capitalizes costs incurred during the application
development stage of software developed for internal use, and expenses costs incurred during the
preliminary project and the post-implementation operation stages of development. The Company
capitalized $4.9 million and $2.0 million, respectively, during the six months ended September 26,
2009 and September 27, 2008, in costs incurred for acquisition of the software license and related
software development costs for new internal software that was in the application development stage.
The total capitalized costs incurred to date include $1.8 million for the cost of the software
license and $26.2 million in third party development costs and internal personnel costs.
The Company successfully completed the final major go-live milestone implementations in the ERP
system during the first six months ended September 26, 2009.
In connection with the development of the software for our next generation Blood Bank apheresis
platform, the Company capitalized $0.0 million and $0.7 million in software development costs
during the six months ended September 26, 2009 and September 27, 2008, respectively, in accordance
with ASC Topic 985-20, Software (formerly known as SFAS No. 86, Accounting for the Cost of Computer
Software to be Sold, Leased, or Otherwise Marketed). Since the start of the project, a total of
$12.0 million in total software development costs has been capitalized in connection with the next
generation Blood Bank apheresis platform. All costs capitalized were incurred after a detailed
design of the software was developed and research and development activities on the underlying
device were completed. Work on the apheresis platform has been temporarily suspended while the
Company focuses on completing another project, which is expected to be completed during fiscal year
2010. We will begin to amortize these costs when the device is released for sale.
Additionally, the Company capitalized $2.5 million and $1.6 million in other software development
costs for ongoing initiatives during the six-months ended September 26, 2009 and September 27,
2008, respectively. At September 26, 2009, we have a total of $8.4 million of costs capitalized
related to other in process software development initiatives. We will begin to amortize these costs
when the products are released for sale.
22
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF
OPERATIONS
This Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (MD&A)
should be read in conjunction with both our interim consolidated financial statements and notes
thereto which appear elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and our annual consolidated
financial statements, notes thereto, and the MD&A contained in our fiscal year 2009 Annual Report
on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC) on May 22, 2009. The
following discussion may contain forward-looking statements and should be read in conjunction with
the Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking
Information beginning on page 33.
Our Business
Haemonetics is a blood management solutions company for our customers. Anchored by our reputable
medical device systems, we also provide information technology platforms and value added services
to provide customers with business solutions which support improved clinical outcomes for patients
and efficiency in the blood supply chain.
Our Plasma and Blood Bank systems automate the collection and processing of donated blood, allowing
users to collect only the blood component(s) they target plasma, platelets, or red blood cells
increasing donor and patient safety as well as collection efficiencies. Our Diagnostics systems
measure a surgical patients clotting ability thereby aiding surgeons in assessing the likelihood
for patient blood loss. Our Surgical systems salvage and process surgical patient blood so the
patients own blood is recovered and can be transfused back to the patient. These systems include
devices and single-use, proprietary disposable sets (disposables) that operate only with our
specialized devices. Our information technology platforms are used by blood and plasma collectors
to improve the safety and efficiency of blood collection logistics by eliminating previously manual
functions at not-for-profit blood banks and commercial plasma centers. Our business services
products include consulting, Six Sigma, LEAN manufacturing and ImpactTM Opportunity
Model offerings that support our customers needs for regulatory compliance and operational
efficiency in the blood supply chain.
We either sell our devices to customers (resulting in equipment revenue) or place our devices with
customers subject to certain conditions. When the device is placed and remains our property, the
customer has the right to use it for a period of time as long as the customer meets certain
conditions we have established, which among other things, generally include one or more of the
following:
|
|
|
Purchase and consumption of a minimum level of disposables products; |
|
|
|
|
Payment of monthly rental fees; and/or |
|
|
|
|
An asset utilization performance metric, such as performing a minimum level of
procedures per month per device. |
Our disposables revenue stream (including sales of disposables and fees for the use of our
equipment) accounted for approximately 88% and 87% of our total revenues for both second quarter
and first six months of fiscal year 2010 and 2009, respectively.
23
Financial Summary
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended |
|
|
|
|
|
For the six months ended |
|
|
|
|
September 26, |
|
September 27, |
|
% Increase/ |
|
September 26, |
|
September 27, |
|
% Increase/ |
(in thousands, except per share data) |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
(Decrease) |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
(Decrease) |
Net revenues |
|
$ |
157,070 |
|
|
$ |
145,919 |
|
|
|
7.6 |
% |
|
$ |
311,158 |
|
|
$ |
290,035 |
|
|
|
7.3 |
% |
Gross profit |
|
$ |
80,967 |
|
|
$ |
74,689 |
|
|
|
8.4 |
% |
|
$ |
163,910 |
|
|
$ |
147,726 |
|
|
|
11.0 |
% |
% of net revenues |
|
|
51.5 |
% |
|
|
51.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
52.7 |
% |
|
|
50.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses |
|
$ |
53,944 |
|
|
$ |
51,080 |
|
|
|
5.6 |
% |
|
$ |
110,560 |
|
|
$ |
104,783 |
|
|
|
5.5 |
% |
Operating income |
|
$ |
27,023 |
|
|
$ |
23,609 |
|
|
|
14.5 |
% |
|
$ |
53,350 |
|
|
$ |
42,943 |
|
|
|
24.2 |
% |
% of net revenues |
|
|
17.2 |
% |
|
|
16.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
17.1 |
% |
|
|
14.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
$ |
(255 |
) |
|
$ |
(16 |
) |
|
|
1493.8 |
% |
|
$ |
(463 |
) |
|
$ |
(40 |
) |
|
|
1057.5 |
% |
Interest income |
|
$ |
103 |
|
|
$ |
506 |
|
|
|
(79.6 |
%) |
|
$ |
253 |
|
|
$ |
1,160 |
|
|
|
(78.2 |
%) |
Other income, net |
|
$ |
(801 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,290 |
) |
|
|
(37.9 |
%) |
|
$ |
(1,135 |
) |
|
$ |
(915 |
) |
|
|
24.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before taxes |
|
$ |
26,070 |
|
|
$ |
22,809 |
|
|
|
14.3 |
% |
|
$ |
52,005 |
|
|
$ |
43,148 |
|
|
|
20.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for income tax |
|
$ |
8,020 |
|
|
$ |
8,002 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
% |
|
$ |
15,882 |
|
|
$ |
14,000 |
|
|
|
13.4 |
% |
% of pre-tax income |
|
|
30.8 |
% |
|
|
35.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
30.5 |
% |
|
|
32.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
18,050 |
|
|
$ |
14,807 |
|
|
|
21.9 |
% |
|
$ |
36,123 |
|
|
$ |
29,148 |
|
|
|
23.9 |
% |
% of net revenues |
|
|
11.5 |
% |
|
|
10.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.6 |
% |
|
|
10.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share-diluted |
|
$ |
0.69 |
|
|
$ |
0.57 |
|
|
|
20.1 |
% |
|
$ |
1.37 |
|
|
$ |
1.11 |
|
|
|
23.7 |
% |
Net revenues increased 7.6% and 7.3% for the second quarter and first six months of fiscal
year 2010 over the comparable periods of fiscal year 2009. The effects of foreign exchange
accounted for an increase of 2.1% and 1.4% for the second quarter and six months, respectively. The
remaining increase of 5.5% for the quarter and 5.9% for the six months is mainly due to increases
in our plasma disposables revenue and software solutions revenue.
Gross profit increased 8.4% and 11.0% as compared to the second quarter and first six months of
fiscal year 2009. The favorable effects of foreign exchange accounted for an increase of 3.4% and
5.8% for the second quarter and first six months of fiscal year 2010, respectively. The remaining
increase of 5.0% for the quarter and 5.2% for the six months was due primarily to increased sales
and manufacturing efficiencies. This was partly offset by changes in product mix driven by higher
sales of our lower margin plasma products.
Operating expenses increased 5.6% and 5.5% for the second quarter and first six months of fiscal
year 2010 over the comparable periods of fiscal year 2009. The favorable effects of foreign
exchange accounted for a decrease in operating expenses of 0.5% for the quarter and 1.7% for the
six months, respectively. Without the effects of foreign exchange, operating expenses increased
6.1% in the second quarter and 7.2% in the first six months of fiscal year 2010. The higher
operating expenses are primarily related to increased investment in research and development, the
expenses from recent acquisitions, expenses associated with our ERP Phase II go-live, and higher
expenses due to the introduction of blood management solutions. The noted increases in operating
expenses were partly offset by a lack of restructuring costs in the first six months of fiscal year
2010 when compared to the first six months of fiscal year 2009.
Operating income increased 14.5% and 24.2% for the second quarter and first six months of fiscal
year 2010 over the comparable periods of fiscal year 2009. The effects of foreign exchange
accounted for an increase of 11.8% and 23.7% for the second quarter and six months, respectively.
Without the effects of foreign exchange operating income increased 2.7% for the quarter and 0.5%
for the six months as a result of noted changes in gross profit and operating expenses.
24
Net income increased 21.9% and 23.7% for the second quarter and first six months of fiscal year
2010 over the comparable periods of fiscal year 2009. The main factors that affected net income
were the increase in operating income and the reduction in tax rate.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Net Revenues by Geography
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the six months ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 26, |
|
|
September 27, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 26, |
|
|
September 27, |
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
% Increase |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
% Increase |
|
United States |
|
$ |
74,856 |
|
|
$ |
66,511 |
|
|
|
12.5 |
% |
|
$ |
149,869 |
|
|
$ |
132,300 |
|
|
|
13.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
International |
|
|
82,214 |
|
|
|
79,408 |
|
|
|
3.5 |
% |
|
|
161,289 |
|
|
|
157,735 |
|
|
|
2.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenues |
|
$ |
157,070 |
|
|
$ |
145,919 |
|
|
|
7.6 |
% |
|
$ |
311,158 |
|
|
$ |
290,035 |
|
|
|
7.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
International Operations and the Impact of Foreign Exchange
Our principal operations are in the U.S., Europe, Japan and other parts of Asia. Our products are
marketed in more than 80 countries around the world via a direct sales force as well as independent
distributors and agents.
Our revenues generated outside the U.S. approximated 52% for both the second quarter and the first
six months of fiscal year 2010 and 54% for both the second quarter and the first six months of
fiscal year 2009. Revenues in Japan accounted for approximately 17.0% and 16.6% of total revenues
for the second quarter of fiscal year 2010 and 2009, respectively and 16.4% and 15.9% of total
revenues for the first six months of fiscal year 2010 and 2009, respectively. Revenues in Europe
accounted for approximately 27.3% and 29.6% of total revenues for the second quarters of fiscal
year 2010 and 2009 and 27.6% and 30.5% of total revenues for the first six months of fiscal year
2010 and 2009, respectively. International sales are primarily conducted in local currencies,
primarily the Japanese Yen and the Euro. As discussed above, our results of operations are impacted
by changes in the value of the Yen and the Euro relative to the U.S. dollar.
Please see section entitled Foreign Exchange in this discussion for a more complete explanation
of how foreign currency affects our business and our strategy for managing this exposure.
Net Revenues by Product Type
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the six months ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 26, |
|
|
September 27, |
|
|
% Increase/ |
|
|
September 26, |
|
|
September 27, |
|
|
% Increase/ |
|
(in thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
(Decrease) |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
(Decrease) |
|
Disposables |
|
$ |
137,748 |
|
|
$ |
127,116 |
|
|
|
8.4 |
% |
|
$ |
273,710 |
|
|
$ |
252,644 |
|
|
|
8.3 |
% |
Software solutions |
|
|
9,100 |
|
|
|
7,079 |
|
|
|
28.5 |
% |
|
|
17,554 |
|
|
|
14,337 |
|
|
|
22.4 |
% |
Equipment & other |
|
|
10,222 |
|
|
|
11,724 |
|
|
|
(12.8 |
%) |
|
|
19,894 |
|
|
|
23,054 |
|
|
|
(13.7 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenues |
|
$ |
157,070 |
|
|
$ |
145,919 |
|
|
|
7.6 |
% |
|
$ |
311,158 |
|
|
$ |
290,035 |
|
|
|
7.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25
Disposables Revenues by Product Type
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the six months ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 26, |
|
|
September 27, |
|
|
% Increase/ |
|
|
September 26, |
|
|
September 27, |
|
|
% Increase/ |
|
(in thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
(Decrease) |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
(Decrease) |
|
Plasma disposables |
|
$ |
59,423 |
|
|
$ |
49,924 |
|
|
|
19.0 |
% |
|
$ |
118,293 |
|
|
$ |
96,792 |
|
|
|
22.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Blood bank disposables |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Platelet |
|
|
37,250 |
|
|
|
36,294 |
|
|
|
2.6 |
% |
|
|
71,557 |
|
|
|
71,953 |
|
|
|
(0.6 |
%) |
Red cell |
|
|
11,484 |
|
|
|
11,758 |
|
|
|
(2.3 |
%) |
|
|
23,263 |
|
|
|
23,600 |
|
|
|
(1.4 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48,734 |
|
|
|
48,052 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
% |
|
|
94,820 |
|
|
|
95,553 |
|
|
|
(0.8 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hospital disposables |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Surgical |
|
|
16,631 |
|
|
|
15,984 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
% |
|
|
34,056 |
|
|
|
33,253 |
|
|
|
2.4 |
% |
OrthoPAT |
|
|
8,678 |
|
|
|
8,393 |
|
|
|
3.4 |
% |
|
|
17,262 |
|
|
|
17,189 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
% |
Diagnostics |
|
|
4,282 |
|
|
|
4,763 |
|
|
|
(10.1 |
%) |
|
|
9,279 |
|
|
|
9,857 |
|
|
|
(5.9 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29,591 |
|
|
|
29,140 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
% |
|
|
60,597 |
|
|
|
60,299 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total disposables revenue |
|
$ |
137,748 |
|
|
$ |
127,116 |
|
|
|
8.4 |
% |
|
$ |
273,710 |
|
|
$ |
252,644 |
|
|
|
8.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disposables
Disposables include the Plasma, Blood Bank, and Hospital product lines. Disposables revenue
increased 8.4% and 8.3% for the second quarter and the first six months of fiscal year 2010 over
the comparable periods of fiscal year 2009. Foreign exchange resulted in a 1.8% and 1.2% increase
for the quarter and six months. The remaining increase of 6.6% and 7.1% for the second quarter and
the first six months of fiscal year 2010 were driven by increases in the Plasma product line, as
discussed below.
Plasma
Plasma disposables revenue increased 19.0% and 22.2% for the second quarter and the first six
months of fiscal year 2010 compared to the same periods in fiscal year 2009. Foreign exchange
resulted in a 2.0% and 1.2% increase for the quarter and six months, respectively. For both the
second quarter and first six months of fiscal year 2010 as compared to the same periods in fiscal
year 2009, higher collections in both the U.S. and Europe, share gains, and, to a lesser extent,
pricing were the main reasons for the remaining increase.
As supply-demand balance has been achieved between source plasma collected and used in
pharmaceutical production, we are seeing a moderation in collections. The fractionation companies
will continue to balance collections to support the underlying growth in demand for plasma drugs
which we believe to be in the 7% range. With contractual price increases, new products, and market
share gains, we anticipate that plasma disposable revenue growth will moderate, but continue to
outpace collection market growth in the near term.
Blood Bank
Blood bank consists of platelet and red cell disposables.
Platelet disposables revenue increased 2.6% for the second quarter and decreased 0.6% for the first
six months of fiscal year 2010 compared to the same periods in fiscal year 2009. Comparing the
second quarter and the first six months of fiscal year 2010 to that of 2009, foreign exchange
accounted for an increase of 2.3% and 2.1%, respectively. For the quarter, the remaining increase
of 0.3% was the result of growth in China and Taiwan offset by share loss in Japan. Without the
effect of currency, revenues decreased 2.7% in the first six months. The decrease was driven by
the first quarter challenges in South Korea associated with the significant devaluation of South
Koreas currency, the Won, and by the reasons noted for the second quarter growth.
Red cell disposables decreased 2.3% and 1.4% for the second quarter and the first six months of
fiscal year 2010 compared to the same periods in fiscal year 2009. Comparing the second quarter and
the first six months of fiscal year 2010 to that of 2009, foreign exchange accounted for a decrease
of 1.1% and 0.7%, respectively. The remaining decrease of 1.2% for the quarter and 0.7% for the six
months was driven by lower demand for red cells, as a result of (i) fewer surgeries, thus a
26
reduced demand for blood and (ii) 5% more donors due to the entry of 16 year olds to the blood
donor population, which combined resulted in a reliance on a higher percentage of whole blood
collections.
Hospital
Hospital consists of surgical, OrthoPAT, and diagnostics products.
Revenues from our surgical disposables increased 4.0% and 2.4% for the second quarter and the first
six months of fiscal year 2010 compared to the same periods in fiscal year 2009. Surgical
disposables revenue consists principally of the Cell Saver and cardioPAT products. Foreign exchange
resulted in an increase in surgical disposables revenue of 1.9% for the quarter and 2.1% for the
six months. Without the effect of currency, surgical disposables increased 2.1% and 0.3% for the
second quarter and the first six months, respectively. The increase was primarily the result of
increases in sales of cardioPAT products, as more hospitals adopt the cardioPAT products.
Revenues from our OrthoPAT disposables increased 3.4% and 0.4% for the second quarter and the first
six months of fiscal year 2010 compared to the same periods in fiscal year 2009. Foreign exchange
had a minimal impact, a 0.5% increase, on OrthoPAT disposables revenue for the quarter and no
impact on revenue for the first six months. The increase was primarily the result of market share
gains.
Revenues from our diagnostics products decreased 10.1% and 5.9% for the second quarter and the
first six months of fiscal year 2010 compared to the same periods in fiscal year 2009. Diagnostics
product revenue consists principally of the TEG products. Comparing the second quarter and the
first six months of fiscal year 2010 to that of 2009, foreign exchange accounted for an increase of
3.9% and 0.4%, respectively. Without the effect of currency, diagnostic product revenues decreased
of 15.0% for the quarter and 6.3% for the six months. Diagnostics product revenue is unique,
compared to revenue from other products, in that it includes TEG disposable and equipment sales.
The revenue decline in the quarter and year-to-date are due to a decline in TEG equipment sales.
The noted decrease was partly offset by an 11.1% and 10.0% increase in TEG disposables for the
second quarter and the first six months of fiscal year 2010.
Software Solutions
Our software solutions revenues include revenue from software sales. Software solutions revenues
increased 28.5% and 22.4% for the second quarter and the first six months of fiscal year 2010 over
the comparable period of fiscal year 2009. Foreign exchange resulted in a 1.4% and 1.1% increase
for the quarter and six months. The remaining increase of 27.1% and 21.3% for the second quarter
and the first six months of fiscal year 2010 was driven by increased sales to commercial plasma
customers and revenues associated with two recent acquisitions.
Equipment & Other
Our equipment & other revenues include revenue from equipment sales, repairs performed under
preventive maintenance contracts or emergency service visits, spare part sales, and various service
and training programs. Equipment & other revenues decreased 12.8% and 13.7% for the second quarter
and the first six months of fiscal year 2010 over the comparable period of fiscal year 2009.
Foreign exchange resulted in a 7.8% and 4.7% increase for the quarter and six months. Without the
effect of currency, the decrease of 20.6% and 18.4% for the second quarter and the first six months
of fiscal year 2010 is primarily the result of fewer equipment sales, particularly to distributor
customers due to macro economic trends impacting health care funding.
Gross Profit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the six months ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 26, |
|
|
September 27, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 26, |
|
|
September 27, |
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
% Increase |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
% Increase |
|
Gross profit |
|
$ |
80,967 |
|
|
$ |
74,689 |
|
|
|
8.4 |
% |
|
$ |
163,910 |
|
|
$ |
147,726 |
|
|
|
11.0 |
% |
% of net revenues |
|
|
51.5 |
% |
|
|
51.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
52.7 |
% |
|
|
50.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Gross profit increased 8.4% and 11.0% for the second quarter and the first six months of
fiscal year 2010 as compared to the same periods of fiscal year 2009. Our gross profit margin
improved 30 basis points for the second quarter and 180 basis points for the first six months of fiscal year 2010.
The improvement was attributable to foreign exchange and improved
27
manufacturing efficiencies, particularly for our plasma business. Product mix partly offset these
improvements due to increased sales of our lower margin plasma products.
Operating Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended |
|
|
|
|
|
For the six months ended |
|
|
|
|
September 26, |
|
September 27, |
|
|
|
|
|
September 26, |
|
September 27, |
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
% Increase |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
% Increase |
Research, development and engineering |
|
$ |
6,475 |
|
|
$ |
5,217 |
|
|
|
24.1 |
% |
|
$ |
13,252 |
|
|
$ |
11,061 |
|
|
|
19.8 |
% |
% of net revenues |
|
|
4.1 |
% |
|
|
3.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.3 |
% |
|
|
3.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative |
|
$ |
47,469 |
|
|
$ |
45,863 |
|
|
|
3.5 |
% |
|
$ |
97,308 |
|
|
$ |
93,722 |
|
|
|
3.8 |
% |
% of net revenues |
|
|
30.2 |
% |
|
|
31.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.3 |
% |
|
|
32.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
$ |
53,944 |
|
|
$ |
51,080 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
110,560 |
|
|
$ |
104,783 |
|
|
|
|
|
% of net revenues |
|
|
34.3 |
% |
|
|
35.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
35.5 |
% |
|
|
36.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Research, Development and Engineering
Research, development and engineering expenses increased 24.1% and 19.8% for the second quarter and
the first six months of fiscal year 2010 as compared to the same periods of fiscal year 2009. The
increase is a result of increased spending in the whole blood and Arryx blood diagnostics
technologies.
Selling, General and Administrative
During the second quarter and first six months of fiscal year 2010, selling, general and
administrative expenses increased 3.5% and 3.8%, respectively. Foreign exchange resulted in a 0.3%
and 1.7% decrease in selling, general and administrative during the quarter. Excluding the impact
of foreign exchange, selling, general and administrative expense increased 3.8% and 5.5% for the
second quarter and six months. The increase was due primarily to (i) expenses brought on from
recent acquisitions that had not been reflected in the second quarter of fiscal year 2009, (ii)
expenses associated with our ERP Phase II go-live, and (iii) general selling, marketing and
handling costs necessary to support the increase in sales and the introduction of blood management
solutions. The noted increases were partly offset by a lack of restructuring costs in the first six
months of fiscal year 2010 when compared to the first six months of fiscal year 2009.
Operating Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended |
|
|
|
|
|
For the six months ended |
|
|
|
|
September 26, |
|
September 27, |
|
|
|
|
|
September 26, |
|
September 27, |
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
% Increase |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
% Increase |
Operating income |
|
$ |
27,023 |
|
|
$ |
23,609 |
|
|
|
14.5 |
% |
|
$ |
53,350 |
|
|
$ |
42,943 |
|
|
|
24.2 |
% |
% of net revenues |
|
|
17.2 |
% |
|
|
16.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
17.1 |
% |
|
|
14.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Operating income increased 14.5% and 24.2% for the second quarter and first six months of fiscal
year 2010 as compared to the same periods of fiscal year 2009. Foreign exchange resulted in
increases of 11.8% and 23.7% in operating income during the quarter and first six months,
respectively. Without the effects of foreign currency, operating income increased 2.7% for the
quarter and 0.5% for the first six months due to the net of sales and gross profit growth offset by
increases in operating expenses.
28
Other (expense)/income,
net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the six months ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 26, |
|
|
September 27, |
|
|
% |
|
|
September 26, |
|
|
September 27, |
|
|
% |
|
(in thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Increase |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Decrease |
|
Interest expense |
|
$ |
(255 |
) |
|
$ |
(16 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(463 |
) |
|
$ |
(40 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
|
103 |
|
|
|
506 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
253 |
|
|
|
1,160 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other expense, net |
|
|
(801 |
) |
|
|
(1,290 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,135 |
) |
|
|
(915 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other (expense)/income, net |
|
$ |
(953 |
) |
|
$ |
(800 |
) |
|
|
19.1 |
% |
|
$ |
(1,345 |
) |
|
$ |
205 |
|
|
|
n.m. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other expense, net increased 19.1% for the second quarter and total other income, net
decreased more than 100% for first six months of fiscal year 2010 as compared to the same periods
of fiscal year 2009. The main reasons for the decrease is the net of (i) the increase in interest
expense due to the accounting relating to the contingent consideration on a recent acquisition and
(ii) the decrease in interest income due to significantly reduced investment yield.
Income Taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the six months ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 26, |
|
|
September 27, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 26, |
|
|
September 27, |
|
|
% |
|
(in thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
% Decrease |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Decrease |
|
Reported income tax rate |
|
|
30.8 |
% |
|
|
35.1 |
% |
|
|
(4.3 |
%) |
|
|
30.5 |
% |
|
|
32.4 |
% |
|
|
(1.9 |
%) |
Our reported tax rate includes two principal components: an expected effective annual tax rate and
discrete items resulting in additional provisions or benefits that are recorded in the quarter that
an event arises. Events or items that give rise to discrete recognition include finalizing audit
examinations for open tax years or a statute of limitations expiration.
The reported tax rate was 30.8% for the three months ended September 26, 2009. The reported tax
rate includes:
|
|
Our expected annual effective tax rate of 31.1%, comprised of the U.S. federal statutory tax
rate of 35.0% reduced by tax benefits from foreign taxes (including our Swiss principal) and a
domestic manufacturing deduction, plus the state tax provision, and stock compensation
expenses not deductible in all jurisdictions; and |
The following discrete items:
|
|
A $0.7 million benefit (on an annual basis) from the remittance of Japanese earnings. |
|
|
|
A $0.1 million cost from foreign tax assessments. |
The reported tax rate was 35.1% for the three months ended September 27, 2008. The reported tax
rate equaled the expected effective annual tax rate which reflected tax benefits from foreign taxes
and a domestic manufacturing deduction, offset in part by the state tax provision, and stock
compensation expense not deductible in all jurisdictions.
The reported tax rate was 30.5% for the six months ended September 26, 2009. The reported tax rate
includes:
|
|
Our expected annual effective tax rate of 31.1%, comprised of the U.S. federal statutory rate
of 35.0% reduced by tax benefits from foreign taxes (including our Swiss principal) and a
domestic manufacturing deduction, plus the state tax provision, and stock compensation
expenses not deductible in all jurisdictions; and |
The following discrete items:
|
|
A $0.7 million benefit (on an annual basis) from the remittance of Japanese earnings. |
|
|
|
A $0.1 million cost from foreign tax assessments. |
29
The reported tax rate was 32.4% for the six months ended September 27, 2008. The reported tax rate
included:
|
|
A 35.1% expected effective annual tax rate which reflects tax benefits from foreign taxes and
a domestic manufacturing deduction, offset in part by the state tax provision, and stock
compensation expenses not deductible in all jurisdictions. The reported tax rate also
included a $1.1 million reversal of previously accrued income taxes because of the expiration
of the statute of limitations. |
We conduct business globally and, as a result, file consolidated federal and separate state and
foreign income tax returns in multiple jurisdictions. In the normal course of business, we are
subject to examination by taxing authorities throughout the world in jurisdictions including the
U.S., Japan, Germany, France, the United Kingdom, and Switzerland. With few exceptions, we are no
longer subject to U.S. federal, state and local, or foreign income tax examinations for years
before 2006.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
The following table contains certain key performance indicators we believe depict our liquidity and cash flow position:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands) |
|
September 26, 2009 |
|
|
March 28, 2009 |
|
Cash & cash equivalents |
|
$ |
178,322 |
|
|
$ |
156,721 |
|
Working capital |
|
$ |
293,302 |
|
|
$ |
289,530 |
|
Current ratio |
|
|
3.6 |
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
Net cash position (1) |
|
$ |
158,167 |
|
|
$ |
150,683 |
|
Days sales outstanding (DSO) |
|
|
68 |
|
|
|
67 |
|
Disposables finished goods inventory turnover |
|
|
6.8 |
|
|
|
7.1 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Net cash position is the sum of cash and cash equivalents less total debt. |
Our primary sources of capital include cash and cash equivalents, internally generated cash flows,
bank borrowings and option exercises. We believe these sources to be sufficient to fund our
requirements, which are primarily capital expenditures and acquisitions, new business and product
development, and working capital for at least the next twelve months.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the six months ended |
|
|
Increase/ |
|
(in thousands) |
|
September 26, 2009 |
|
|
September 27, 2008 |
|
|
(Decrease) |
|
Net cash provided by (used in): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating activities |
|
$ |
61,479 |
|
|
$ |
41,777 |
|
|
$ |
19,702 |
|
Investing activities |
|
|
(52,261 |
) |
|
|
(28,737 |
) |
|
|
(23,524 |
) |
Financing activities |
|
|
11,907 |
|
|
|
(33,825 |
) |
|
|
45,732 |
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents (1) |
|
|
476 |
|
|
|
(1,437 |
) |
|
|
1,913 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase/(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
21,601 |
|
|
$ |
(22,222 |
) |
|
$ |
43,823 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The balance sheet is affected by spot exchange rates used to translate local currency amounts into U.S. dollars. In
accordance with GAAP, we have removed the effect of foreign currency throughout our cash flow statement, except for its
effect on our cash and cash equivalents. |
In May 2009, Board of Directors approved a $40 million share repurchase. Through September 26,
2009, the Company repurchased 139,722 shares of its common stock for an aggregate purchase price of
$7.6 million. Of the shares repurchased, 22,413 shares at an aggregate purchase price of $1.2
million had not yet settled as of September 26, 2009. At September 26, 2009, we had $32.4 million
remaining on the $40 million share repurchase limit set by the Board of Directors.
Cash Flow Overview:
30
Operating Activities:
Net cash provided by operating activities increased by $19.7 million in the first six months of
fiscal year 2010 as compared to the first six months of 2009 due primarily to:
|
|
|
$7.0 million increase in net income; |
|
|
|
|
$9.1 million reduced investment in accounts receivable due to improved collections over
the same period last year; |
|
|
|
|
$9.9 million reduced investment in inventories; |
|
|
|
|
$6.2 million reduced investment in prepaid income taxes; and |
|
|
|
|
$9.9 million reduced investment in other assets and other long-term liabilities |
partially offset by
|
|
|
the $5.9 million change in unrealized gain from hedging activities and |
|
|
|
|
a $17.1 million increase in payments of accounts payable and accrued expenses that was
primarily the result of a $13.7 million payment of (i) the fiscal year 2009 employee
performance bonuses worldwide and (ii) the discretionary bonus for extraordinary
performance to all employees other than the Chief Executive Officer and certain other
executives during the first quarter of fiscal year 2010. |
Investing Activities:
Net cash used in investing activities increased during the first six months of fiscal year 2010 as
compared to the first six months of 2009 due primarily to the $12.8 million acquisition of SEBRA,
the $6.6 million paid relating to the acquisition of Neoteric, and the $4.1 million increased
spending in capital expenditures on property, plant, and equipment.
Financing Activities:
Net cash used in financing activities decreased by $45.7 million in the first six months of fiscal
year 2010 as compared to the first six months of 2009 due primarily to:
|
|
|
$53.7 million decrease in cash paid out relating to stock repurchases and |
|
|
|
|
$11.5 million increase in net borrowings under short-term revolving credit agreements |
partially offset by
|
|
|
$19.5 million decrease in exercise of stock options and related tax benefits. |
Inflation
We do not believe that inflation had a significant impact on our results of operations for the
periods presented. Historically, we believe we have been able to mitigate the effects of inflation
by improving our manufacturing and purchasing efficiencies, by increasing employee productivity,
and by adjusting the selling prices of products. We continue to monitor inflation pressures
generally and raw materials indices that may affect our procurement and production costs. Increases
in the price of petroleum derivatives could result in corresponding increases in our costs to
procure plastic raw materials.
Foreign Exchange
Our revenues generated outside the U.S. in local currencies approximated 52% for both the second
quarter and the first six months of fiscal year 2010, yet our reporting currency is the U.S.
dollar. Foreign exchange risk arises because we engage in business in foreign countries in local
currency. Exposure is partially mitigated by producing and sourcing product in local
31
currency and expenses incurred by local sales offices. However, whenever the U.S. dollar
strengthens relative to the other major currencies, there is an adverse affect on our results of
operations and alternatively, whenever the U.S. dollar weakens relative to the other major
currencies there is a positive effect on our results of operations.
Our primary foreign currency exposures in relation to the U.S. dollar are the Euro and the Japanese
Yen. In response to the global economic turmoil and sharply increased volatility in the foreign
exchange rates, we entered into forward contracts to hedge the anticipated cash flows from
forecasted Great British Pound and Canadian Dollar denominated expenses.
It is our policy to minimize for a period of time, the unforeseen impact on our financial results
of fluctuations in foreign exchange rates by using derivative financial instruments known as
forward contracts to hedge the anticipated cash flows from forecasted foreign currency denominated
sales. Hedging through the use of forward contracts does not eliminate the volatility of foreign
exchange rates, but because we generally enter into forward contracts one year in advance of the
foreign currency denominated cash flows, rates are fixed for a one-year period, thereby
facilitating financial planning and resource allocation. We enter into forward contracts that
mature one month prior to the anticipated timing of the forecasted foreign currency denominated
sales. These contracts are designated as cash flow hedges and are intended to lock in the expected
cash flows of forecasted foreign currency denominated sales at the available spot rate. Actual spot
rate gains and losses on these contracts are recorded in sales, at the same time the underlying
transactions being hedged are recorded. The final impact of currency fluctuations on the results of
operations is dependent on the local currency amounts hedged and the actual local currency results.
Presented below are the spot rates for our Euro and Japanese Yen cash flow hedges that settled in
fiscal year 2009, settled the first six months of fiscal year 2010, or are presently outstanding.
These hedges cover our long foreign currency positions that result from our sales in Europe and
Japan. The table also shows the relative strengthening or weakening of the spot rates associated
with those hedge contracts versus the spot rates in the contracts that settled in the prior
comparable period.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First |
|
Strengthen |
|
Second |
|
Strengthen |
|
Third |
|
Strengthen |
|
Fourth |
|
Strengthen |
|
|
Quarter |
|
/ (Weaken) |
|
Quarter |
|
/ (Weaken) |
|
Quarter |
|
/ (Weaken) |
|
Quarter |
|
/ (Weaken) |
Euro Hedge Spot Rate (US$ per Euro) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY09
|
|
|
1.3453 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.3704 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.4396 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.4908 |
|
|
|
|
|
FY10
|
|
|
1.5681 |
|
|
|
16.6 |
% |
|
|
1.4890 |
|
|
|
8.6 |
% |
|
|
1.3192 |
|
|
|
(8.4 |
%) |
|
|
1.2812 |
|
|
|
(14.1 |
%) |
FY11
|
|
|
1.3582 |
|
|
|
(13.4 |
%) |
|
|
1.4272 |
|
|
|
(4.2 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Japanese Yen Hedge Spot Rate (JPY per US$) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY09
|
|
|
120.6432 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
116.7411 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
112.8810 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
106.2511 |
|
|
|
|
|
FY10
|
|
|
105.2792 |
|
|
|
12.7 |
% |
|
|
105.1132 |
|
|
|
10.0 |
% |
|
|
96.3791 |
|
|
|
14.6 |
% |
|
|
93.4950 |
|
|
|
12.0 |
% |
FY11
|
|
|
98.1677 |
|
|
|
6.8 |
% |
|
|
97.1902 |
|
|
|
7.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
We generally place our cash flow hedge contracts on a rolling twelve month basis. Accordingly, the only hedge
contracts placed for fiscal year 2011 are for the first and second quarters. |
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In October 2009, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2009-13, Multiple-Deliverable
Revenue Arrangements, an amendment to FASB ASC topic 605, Revenue Recognition, and Update No.
2009-14, Certain Revenue Arrangements That Include Software Elements, an amendment to FASB ASC
subtopic 985-605, Software Revenue Recognition, (the Updates). The Updates provide guidance
on arrangements that include software elements, including tangible products that have software
components that are essential to the functionality of the tangible product and will no longer be
within the scope of the software revenue recognition guidance, and software-enabled products that
will now be subject to other relevant revenue recognition guidance. The Updates provide
authoritative guidance on revenue arrangements with multiple deliverables that are outside the
scope of the software revenue recognition guidance. Under the new guidance, when vendor specific
objective evidence or third party evidence for deliverables in an arrangement cannot be determined,
a best estimate of the selling price is required to separate deliverables and allocate arrangement
consideration using the relative selling price method. The Updates also include new disclosure
requirements on how the application of the relative selling price method affects the timing and
amount of revenue recognition. The Updates must be adopted in the same period using the same
transition method and are effective prospectively, with retrospective adoption permitted, for
revenue arrangements entered into or materially modified in fiscal years beginning on or after June
15, 2010. Early adoption is also permitted; however, early adoption during an interim period
requires retrospective application from the beginning of the fiscal year. The
32
Company is currently assessing the timing and method of adoption, as well as the possible impact of
this guidance on its financial position and results of operations.
In June 2009, the FASB issued requirements under FASB Statement No. 168, The FASB Accounting
Standards Codification and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles a
replacement of FASB Statement No. 162. The FASB Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) will
become the source of authoritative U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) recognized
by the FASB to be applied by nongovernmental entities. Rules and interpretive releases of the SEC
under authority of federal securities laws are also sources of authoritative GAAP for SEC
registrants. FASB Statement No. 168 is effective for financial statements issued for interim and
annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. This statement became effective during our second
quarter of fiscal year 2010 and its impact is reflected in our financial position and results of
operation for the six months ended September 26, 2009.
Under ASC Topic 805, Business Combinations (formerly known as FASB Statement No. 141(R), Business
Combinations), the FASB requires that all business combinations use the acquisition method
(formerly the purchase method) and that an acquiring entity be identified in all business
combinations. ASC Topic 805 also requires the acquiring entity in a business combination to
recognize all (and only) the assets acquired and liabilities assumed in the transaction;
establishes the acquisition-date fair value as the measurement objective for all assets acquired
and liabilities assumed; and requires the acquirer to disclose to investors and other users all of
the information they need to evaluate and understand the nature and financial effect of the
business combination. This statement became effective for our fiscal year 2010 and its impact is
reflected in our financial position and results of operations for the six months ended September
26, 2009. The Companys acquisition of LAttitude Medical Systems, Inc. (Neoteric) and asset
acquisition of the blood collection and processing business unit (SEBRA) of Engineering and
Research Associates, Inc. during the first six months of fiscal year 2010 were both accounted for
in accordance to the requirements of ASC Topic 805 see Note 9.
Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Information
Statements contained in this report, as well as oral statements we make which are prefaced with the
words may, will, expect, anticipate, continue, estimate, project, intend,
designed, and similar expressions, are intended to identify forward looking statements regarding
events, conditions, and financial trends that may affect our future plans of operations, business
strategy, results of operations, and financial position. These statements are based on our current
expectations and estimates as to prospective events and circumstances about which we can give no
firm assurance. Further, any forward-looking statement speaks only as of the date on which such
statement is made, and we undertake no obligation to update any forward-looking statement to
reflect events or circumstances after the date on which such statement is made. As it is not
possible to predict every new factor that may emerge, forward-looking statements should not be
relied upon as a prediction of our actual future financial condition or results. These
forward-looking statements, like any forward-looking statements, involve risks and uncertainties
that could cause actual results to differ materially from those projected or anticipated. Such
risks and uncertainties include technological advances in the medical field, and our standards for
transfusion medicine and our ability to successfully implement products that incorporate such
advances and standards, product demand and market acceptance of our products, regulatory
uncertainties, the effect of economic and political conditions, the impact of competitive products
and pricing, price volatility in petroleum products (plastics are the principal component of our
disposables, which are the main source of our revenues), the impact of industry consolidation,
foreign currency exchange rates, changes in customers ordering patterns, the effect of industry
consolidation as seen in the Plasma market, the effect of communicable diseases and the effect of
uncertainties in markets outside the U.S. (including Europe and Asia) in which we operate. The
foregoing list should not be construed as exhaustive.
33
ITEM 3. Quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk
The Companys exposures relative to market risk are due to foreign exchange risk and interest rate
risk.
Foreign exchange risk
See the section entitled Foreign Exchange for a discussion of how foreign currency affects our
business. It is our policy to minimize for a period of time, the unforeseen impact on our
financial results of fluctuations in foreign exchange rates by using derivative financial
instruments known as forward contracts to hedge anticipated cash flows from forecasted foreign
currency denominated sales. We do not use the financial instruments for speculative or trading
activities. At September 26, 2009, we had the following significant foreign exchange contracts to
hedge the anticipated cash flows from forecasted foreign currency denominated sales outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(BUY) / SELL |
|
|
Weighted Spot |
|
|
Weighted Forward |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
|
|
Hedged Currency |
|
Local Currency |
|
|
Contract Rate |
|
|
Contract Rate |
|
|
Gain / (Loss) |
|
|
Maturity |
|
Euro |
|
|
7,828,000 |
|
|
|
1.299 |
|
|
|
1.292 |
|
|
$ |
(1,413,761 |
) |
|
Oct 2009 - Nov 2009 |
Euro |
|
|
10,584,808 |
|
|
|
1.281 |
|
|
|
1.282 |
|
|
$ |
(1,985,965 |
) |
|
Dec 2009 - Feb 2010 |
Euro |
|
|
9,582,063 |
|
|
|
1.358 |
|
|
|
1.357 |
|
|
$ |
(1,079,106 |
) |
|
Mar 2010 - May 2010 |
Euro |
|
|
8,816,747 |
|
|
|
1.427 |
|
|
|
1.428 |
|
|
$ |
(387,977 |
) |
|
Jun 2010 - Aug 2010 |
Japanese Yen |
|
|
1,134,426,068 |
|
|
94.36 |
per US$ |
|
93.53 |
per US$ |
|
$ |
(296,028 |
) |
|
Oct 2009 - Nov 2009 |
Japanese Yen |
|
|
1,394,096,500 |
|
|
93.50 |
per US$ |
|
92.58 |
per US$ |
|
$ |
(215,647 |
) |
|
Dec 2009 - Feb 2010 |
Japanese Yen |
|
|
1,369,475,624 |
|
|
98.17 |
per US$ |
|
97.50 |
per US$ |
|
$ |
(941,142 |
) |
|
Mar 2010 - May 2010 |
Japanese Yen |
|
|
1,392,004,698 |
|
|
94.91 |
per US$ |
|
94.35 |
per US$ |
|
$ |
(519,603 |
) |
|
Jun 2010 - Aug 2010 |
GBP |
|
|
(711,970 |
) |
|
|
1.399 |
|
|
|
1.399 |
|
|
$ |
167,372 |
|
|
Oct 2010 |
GBP |
|
|
(2,274,093 |
) |
|
|
1.405 |
|
|
|
1.406 |
|
|
$ |
512,921 |
|
|
Nov 2009 - Jan 2010 |
GBP |
|
|
(2,276,051 |
) |
|
|
1.471 |
|
|
|
1.472 |
|
|
$ |
359,711 |
|
|
Feb 2010 - Apr 2010 |
GBP |
|
|
(2,727,724 |
) |
|
|
1.653 |
|
|
|
1.652 |
|
|
$ |
(40,838 |
) |
|
May 2010 - Jul 2010 |
GBP |
|
|
(818,502 |
) |
|
|
1.633 |
|
|
|
1.631 |
|
|
$ |
3,609 |
|
|
Aug - 2010 |
CAD |
|
|
(3,247,851 |
) |
|
1.113 |
per US$ |
|
1.111 |
per US$ |
|
$ |
96,026 |
|
|
Oct 2009 - Dec 2009 |
CAD |
|
|
(3,761,190 |
) |
|
1.088 |
per US$ |
|
1.086 |
per US$ |
|
$ |
32,844 |
|
|
Jan 2010 - Mar 2010 |
CAD |
|
|
(2,985,642 |
) |
|
1.096 |
per US$ |
|
1.095 |
per US$ |
|
$ |
47,610 |
|
|
Apr 2010 - Jun 2010 |
CAD |
|
|
(2,138,628 |
) |
|
1.108 |
per US$ |
|
1.108 |
per US$ |
|
$ |
55,301 |
|
|
Jul 2010 - Aug 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(5,604,674 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We estimate the change in the fair value of all forward contracts assuming both a 10%
strengthening and weakening of the U.S. dollar relative to all other major currencies. In the
event of a 10% strengthening of the U.S. dollar, the change in fair value of all forward contracts
would result in a $11.6 million increase in the fair value of the forward contracts; whereas a 10%
weakening of the US dollar would result in a $13.2 million decrease in the fair value of the
forward contracts.
Interest Rate Risk
All of our long-term debt is at fixed rates. Accordingly, a change in interest rates has an
insignificant effect on our interest expense amounts. The fair value of our long-term debt,
however, does change in response to interest rate movements due to its fixed rate nature. These
changes reflect the premium (when market interest rates decline below the contract fixed interest
rates) or discount (when market interest rates rise above the fixed interest rate) that an investor
in these long term obligations would pay in the market interest rate environment.
At September 26, 2009, the fair value of our long-term debt was approximately $0.7 million higher
than the value of the debt reflected on our financial statements. This higher fair market is
entirely related to the $5.0 million remaining principal balance of the original $10.0 million,
8.41% real estate mortgage due January, 2016.
Using scenario analysis, if the interest rate on all long-term maturities changed by 10% from the
rate levels that existed at September 26, 2009, the fair value of our long-term debt would change
by approximately $0.1 million.
34
ITEM 4. Controls and Procedures
We conducted an evaluation, as of September 26, 2009, under the supervision and with the
participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
(the Companys principal executive officer and principal financial officer, respectively) regarding
the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as defined
in Rule 13a-15 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act). Based upon that
evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure
controls and procedures are effective.
There were no changes in the Companys internal control over financial reporting occurred during
the three months ended September 26, 2009 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
35
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
|
|
|
Item 1. |
|
Legal Proceedings |
In December 2005, we filed a lawsuit against Baxter Healthcare SA and Fenwal Inc. in Massachusetts
federal district court, seeking an injunction and damages on account of Baxters infringement of a
Haemonetics patent, through the sale of Baxters ALYX brand automated red cell collection system, a
competitor of our automated red cell collection systems. In March 2007, Baxter sold the Transfusion
Technologies Division (which markets the ALYX product) to private investors, TPG, and Maverick
Capital, Ltd. The new company which resulted from the sale was renamed Fenwal. In January 2009, a
jury found that the Fenwal ALYX system infringed Haemonetics patent and awarded us $15.7 million
in damages for past infringement. On June 2, 2009, the court ruled that, in addition to paying the
damages awarded by the jury, Fenwal must stop selling the ALYX consumable by December 1, 2010 and
must pay Haemonetics a 10% royalty on ALYX consumable net sales from January 30, 2009 until
December 1, 2010 when the injunction takes effect. In addition, the court awarded pre-judgment
interest at 5% on the unpaid damages awarded. On August 19, 2009, an amended judgment was issued
under which Haemonetics was awarded $11.3 million for lost profits suffered as a result of the
infringement, $4.4 million in royalty damages suffered as a result of the infringement, and
prejudgment interest of $2.3 million for a total award of $18.0 million. These rulings may be
appealed by Fenwal or Baxter.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
In addition to the other information set forth in this report, careful consideration should be
given to the factors discussed in Part 1, Item 1A. Risk Factors in the Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended March 28, 2009, which could materially affect the Companys business,
financial condition or future results. The risks described in the Companys Annual Report on Form
10-K are not the only risks facing the Company. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently
known to the Company or that it currently deems to be immaterial also may materially adversely
affect its business, financial condition and/or operating results.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
Through September 26, 2009, the Company repurchased 139,722 shares of its common stock for an
aggregate purchase price of $7.6 million. Of the shares repurchased, 22,413 shares at an aggregate
purchase price of $1.2 million had not yet settled as of September 26, 2009. We reflect stock
repurchases in our financial statements on a trade date basis and as Authorized Unissued
(Haemonetics is a Massachusetts company and under Massachusetts law repurchased shares are treated
as authorized but unissued). In April 2 2009, the Board of Directors set a $40.0 million share
repurchase expenditure limit which was publicly announced. At September 26, 2009 we had $32.4
million remaining on the $40.0 million share repurchase limit set by the Board of Directors.
All of the purchases during the quarter were made under the publicly announced program. All
purchases were made in the open market.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Dollar Value |
|
|
Maximum Dollar |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Price |
|
|
of Shares Purchased |
|
|
Value of Shares that |
|
|
|
Total Number |
|
|
Paid per Share |
|
|
as Part of Publicly |
|
|
May Yet be |
|
|
|
of Shares |
|
|
including |
|
|
Announced Plans |
|
|
Purchased Under the |
|
Period |
|
Repurchased |
|
|
Commissions |
|
|
or Programs |
|
|
Plans or Programs |
|
Aug. 23, 2009 to
Sept. 26, 2009 |
|
|
139,722 |
|
|
$ |
54.83 |
|
|
$ |
7,579,989 |
|
|
$ |
32,420,011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
139,722 |
|
|
$ |
54.83 |
|
|
$ |
7,579,989 |
|
|
$ |
32,420,011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 3. Defaults upon Senior Securities
Not applicable.
36
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
On July 30, 2009 the Company held its annual meeting of stockholders. At the meeting,
Ronald Gelbman and Brad Nutter were re-elected as Directors for a term ending in 2012. The
voting results were as follows:
Ronald Gelbman For: 24,207,111 Withheld: 373,408
Brad Nutter For: 23,819,968 Withheld: 760,551
The other members of the Board of Directors whose terms continued after the meeting
were:
Serving a Term Ending in 2010 Susan Bartlett Foote, Pedro P. Granadillo, and Mark W.
Kroll, Ph.D.
Serving a Term Ending in 2011 Lawrence Best, Brian Concannon, and Ronald Merriman
At the meeting, the stockholders ratified the selection by the Board of Directors of
Ernst & Young LLP as independent public accountants for the current fiscal year. The vote was
as follows:
For: 23,158,297 Against: 1,417,607 Abstain: 4,614 Broker Non-Vote:
Item 5. Other Information
None
Item 6. Exhibits
|
|
|
10Z
|
|
2005 Long-Term Incentive Compensation Plan effective July 27, 2005, as amended July 31, 2008
and July 29, 2009 |
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Certification pursuant to Section 302 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, of Brian Concannon,
President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company |
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certification pursuant to Section 302 of Sarbanes-Oxley of 2002, of Christopher Lindop, Chief
Financial Officer and Vice President Business Development of the Company |
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
Certification Pursuant to 18 United States Code Section 1350, as adopted Pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, of Brian Concannon, President and Chief Executive
Officer of the Company |
|
|
|
32.2
|
|
Certification Pursuant to 18 United States Code Section 1350, as adopted Pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, of Christopher Lindop, Chief Financial Officer and Vice
President Business Development of the Company |
37
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
HAEMONETICS CORPORATION
|
|
Date: November 4, 2009 |
By: |
/s/ Brian Concannon
|
|
|
|
Brian Concannon, President and Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
(Principal Executive Officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
Date: November 4, 2009 |
By: |
/s/ Christopher Lindop
|
|
|
|
Christopher Lindop, Chief Financial Officer and Vice |
|
|
|
President Business Development (Principal Financial Officer) |
|
|
38
exv10wz
Exhibit 10Z
Haemonetics Corporation
2005 Long-Term Incentive
Compensation Plan
Effective July 27, 2005
As Amended:
July 31, 2008
July 29, 2009
TABLE OF CONTENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page |
|
Article 1. Establishment, Objectives, and Duration |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Article 2. Definitions |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Article 3. Administration |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Article 4. Shares Subject to the Plan and Maximum Awards |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Article 5. Eligibility and Participation |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Article 6. Stock Options |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Article 7. Stock Appreciation Rights |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Article 8. Restricted Stock |
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Article 9. Deferred Stock/Restricted Stock Units |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Article 10. Other Stock Unit Awards |
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Article 11. Performance Shares |
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Article 12. Performance Measures |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Article 13. Rights of Participants |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Article 14. Termination of Employment/Directorship |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Article 15. Change in Control |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Article 16. Amendment, Modification, and Termination |
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Article 17. Withholding |
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Article 18. Successors |
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Article 19. General Provisions |
|
|
16 |
|
-i-
Article 1. Establishment, Objectives, and Duration
1.1 Establishment of the Plan. Haemonetics Corporation, a Massachusetts corporation, hereby
adopts the Haemonetics Corporation 2005 Long-Term Incentive Compensation Plan (hereinafter
referred to as the Plan), as set forth in this document. The Plan permits the grant of
Nonqualified Stock Options, Incentive Stock Options, Stock Appreciation Rights, Restricted Stock,
Deferred Stock/Restricted Stock Units, Other Stock Units and Performance Shares.
Subject to approval by the Companys stockholders, this Plan shall become effective as of July
27, 2005 (the Effective Date). Awards may be granted under this Plan prior to such stockholder
approval; provided, the effectiveness of such Awards shall be contingent on such stockholder
approval being obtained.
1.2 Objectives of the Plan. The objectives of the Plan are to optimize the profitability and
growth of the Company through incentives that are consistent with the Companys goals and that link
the personal interests of Participants to those of the Companys stockholders, to provide
Participants with an incentive for excellence in individual performance, and to promote teamwork
among Participants.
The Plan is further intended to provide flexibility to the Company and its Subsidiaries in
their ability to motivate, attract, and retain the services of Participants who make significant
contributions to the Companys success and to allow Participants to share in that success.
1.3 Duration of the Plan. The Plan shall remain in effect, subject to the right of the
Committee to amend or terminate the Plan at any time pursuant to Article 16 hereof, until the
earlier of when (a) all Shares subject to it shall have been purchased or acquired according to the
Plans provisions or (b) the seventh (7th) anniversary of the Effective Date. However
(in case of any amendment to the previous sentence), in no event may an Award of an Incentive Stock
Option be granted under the Plan on or after the tenth (10th) anniversary of the
Effective Date.
Article 2. Definitions
Whenever used in this Plan, the following terms shall have the meanings set forth below, and
when the meaning is intended, the initial letter of the word shall be capitalized:
2.1 Award means, individually or collectively, a grant under this Plan of Nonqualified Stock
Options, Incentive Stock Options, Stock Appreciation Rights, Restricted Stock, Deferred
Stock/Restricted Stock Units, Other Stock Units or Performance Shares.
2.2 Award Agreement means a written or electronic agreement entered into by the Company and
a Participant setting forth the terms and provisions applicable to an Award granted under this
Plan.
2.3 Beneficial Owner or Beneficial Ownership shall have the meaning ascribed to such term
in Rule 13d-3 of the General Rules and Regulations under the Exchange Act.
2.4 Board or Board of Directors means the Board of Directors of the Company.
2.5 Change in Control shall be deemed to have occurred if any person or any two or more
persons acting as a group, and all affiliates of such person or persons, who prior to such
-1-
time owned less than thirty-five percent (35%) of the then outstanding common stock of the
Company, shall acquire such additional shares of the Companys common stock in one or more
transactions, or series of transactions, such that following such transaction or transactions, such
person or group and affiliates beneficially own thirty-five percent (35%) or more of the Companys
common stock outstanding.
2.6 Code means the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended from time to time.
2.7 Committee means the committee appointed from time to time by the Companys Board of
Directors to administer the Plan. The full Board of Directors, in its discretion, may act as the
Committee under the Plan, whether or not a Committee has been appointed, and shall do so with
respect to grants of Awards to non-employee Directors. The Committee may delegate to one or more
members of the Committee or officers of the Company, individually or acting as a committee, any
portion of its authority, except as otherwise expressly provided in the Plan. In the event of a
delegation to a member of the Committee, officer or a committee thereof, the term Committee as
used herein shall include the member of the Committee, officer or committee with respect to the
delegated authority. Notwithstanding any such delegation of authority, the Committee comprised of
members of the Board of Directors and appointed by the Board of Directors shall retain overall
responsibility for the operation of the Plan.
2.8 Company means Haemonetics Corporation, a Massachusetts corporation, and any successor
thereto as provided in Article 18 hereof.
2.9 Covered Employee means a Participant who, as of the date of vesting and/or payout of an
Award, or the date the Company or any of its Subsidiaries is entitled to a tax deduction as a
result of the Award, as applicable, is one of the group of covered employees, as defined in the
regulations promulgated under Code Section 162(m), or any successor statute.
2.10 Deferred Stock Unit means an Award granted to a Participant pursuant to Article 9
hereof.
2.11 Director means any individual who is a member of the Board of Directors of the Company;
provided, however, that any Director who is employed by the Company shall be treated as an Employee
under the Plan.
2.12 Disability shall mean a condition whereby the Participant is unable to engage in any
substantial gainful activity by reason of any medically determinable physical impairment which can
be expected to result in death or which is or can be expected to last for a continuous period of
not less than twelve months, all as verified by a physician acceptable to, or selected by, the
Company.
2.13 Effective Date shall have the meaning ascribed to such term in Section 1.1 hereof.
2.14 Employee means any employee of the Company or its Subsidiaries.
2.15 Exchange Act means the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended from time to time,
or any successor act thereto.
2.16 Fair Market Value as of any date and in respect of any Share means the average of the
high and low trading prices for the Shares as reported on the New York Stock Exchange for that
date, or if no such prices are reported for that date, the average of the high and low
-2-
trading prices on the next preceding date for which such prices were reported, unless
otherwise determined by the Committee. In no event shall the fair market value of any Share be
less than its par value.
2.17 Incentive Stock Option or ISO means an option to purchase Shares granted under
Article 6 hereof and that is designated as an Incentive Stock Option and that is intended to meet
the requirements of Code Section 422.
2.18 Insider shall mean an individual who is, on the relevant date, an executive officer,
director or ten percent (10%) beneficial owner of any class of the Companys equity securities that
is registered pursuant to Section 12 of the Exchange Act, all as defined under Section 16 of the
Exchange Act.
2.19 Key Employee shall mean an employee (as defined in Code Section 416(i) (but without
regard to paragraph (5) thereof)) of the Company.
2.20 Nonqualified Stock Option or NQSO means an option to purchase Shares granted under
Article 6 hereof that is not intended to meet the requirements of Code Section 422, or that
otherwise does not meet such requirements.
2.21 Option means an Incentive Stock Option or a Nonqualified Stock Option.
2.22 Option Price means the price at which a Share may be purchased by a Participant
pursuant to an Option.
2.23 Other Stock Unit Award means an Award granted to a Participant, as described in Article
10 hereof.
2.24 Participant means an Employee or Director who has been selected to receive an Award or
who has an outstanding Award granted under the Plan.
2.25 Performance-Based Exception means the performance-based exception from the tax
deductibility limitations of Code Section 162(m).
2.26 Performance Share means an Award granted to a Participant, as described in Article 11
hereof.
2.27 Period of Restriction means the period during which the transfer of Shares of
Restricted Stock is limited in some way (based on the passage of time, the achievement of
performance goals, or upon the occurrence of other events as determined by the Committee, at its
discretion), and the Shares are subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture, pursuant to the
Restricted Stock Award Agreement, as provided in Article 8 hereof.
2.28 Person shall have the meaning ascribed to such term in Section 3(a)(9) of the Exchange
Act and used in Sections 13(d) and 14(d) thereof and the rules promulgated thereunder, including a
group as defined in Section 13(d) thereof and the rules promulgated.
2.29 Restricted Stock means an Award granted to a Participant pursuant to Article 8 hereof.
2.30 Restricted Stock Unit means an Award granted to a Participant pursuant to Article 9
hereof.
2.31 Shares means shares of the Companys common stock, par value $.01 per share.
-3-
2.32 Stock Appreciation Right or SAR means an Award granted pursuant to the terms of
Article 7 hereof.
2.33 Subsidiary means any corporation, partnership, joint venture, or other entity in which
the Company, directly or indirectly, has a majority voting interest. With respect to Incentive
Stock Options, Subsidiary means any entity, domestic or foreign, whether or not such entity now
exists or is hereafter organized or acquired by the Company or by a Subsidiary that is a
subsidiary corporation within the meaning of Code Section 424(d) and the rules thereunder.
2.34 Ten Percent Shareholder means an employee who at the time an ISO is granted owns Shares
possessing more than ten percent of the total combined voting power of all classes of stock of the
Company or any Subsidiary, within the meaning of Code Section 422.
Article 3. Administration
3.1 General. Subject to the terms and conditions of the Plan, the Plan shall be administered
by the Committee. The members of the Committee shall be appointed from time to time by, and shall
serve at the discretion of, the Board of Directors. The Committee shall have the authority to
delegate administrative duties to officers of the Company. For purposes of making Awards intended
to qualify for the Performance Based Exception under Code Section 162(m), to the extent required
under such Code Section, the Committee shall be comprised solely of two or more individuals who are
outside directors, as that term is defined in Code Section 162(m) and the regulations thereunder.
3.2 Authority of the Committee. Except as limited by law or by the Certificate of
Incorporation or Bylaws of the Company, and subject to the provisions hereof, the Committee shall
have full power to select Employees and Directors who shall be offered the opportunity to
participate in the Plan; determine the sizes and types of Awards; determine the terms and
conditions of Awards in a manner consistent with the Plan (including, but not limited to,
termination provisions); construe and interpret the Plan and any agreement or instrument entered
into under the Plan; establish, amend, or waive rules and regulations for the Plans
administration; and amend the terms and conditions of any outstanding Award as provided in the
Plan. Further, the Committee shall make all other determinations that it deems necessary or
advisable for the administration of the Plan. As permitted by law and the terms of the Plan, the
Committee may delegate its authority herein. No member of the Committee shall be liable for any
action taken or decision made in good faith relating to the Plan or any Award granted hereunder.
3.3 Decisions Binding. All determinations and decisions made by the Committee pursuant to the
provisions of the Plan and all related orders and resolutions of the Committee shall be final,
conclusive, and binding on all persons, including the Company, its stockholders, Directors,
Employees, Participants, and their estates and beneficiaries, unless changed by the Board.
-4-
Article 4. Shares Subject to the Plan and Maximum Awards
4.1 Number of Shares Available for Grants. Subject to adjustment as provided in Section 4.2
hereof, the number of Shares hereby reserved for issuance on or after July 31, 2008 to Participants
under the Plan shall equal 2,500,000. Subject to adjustment as provided in Section 4.2 hereof, the
maximum number of Shares that may be issued pursuant to Incentive Stock Options shall not exceed
500,000. Any Shares that are subject to Award of Stock Options or Stock Appreciation Rights shall
be counted against this limit as one (1) Share for every one (1) Share issued. Any Shares that are
subject to Awards other than Stock Options or Stock Appreciation Rights shall be counted against
this limit as 2.5 Shares for every one (1) Share granted on or after July 31, 2008.
Any Shares covered by an Award (or portion of an Award) granted under the Plan which is
settled in cash in lieu of Shares, forfeited, terminated or otherwise canceled or expires shall be
deemed not to have been delivered for purposes of determining the maximum number of Shares
available for delivery under the Plan. If a Participant tenders shares (either actually, by
attestation or otherwise) to pay all or any part of the Option Price or purchase price on an Award
or if any shares payable with respect to any Award are retained by the Company in satisfaction of
the Participants obligation for taxes, the number of shares actually tendered or retained shall
not become or again be, as the case may be, included in the Share limit described in this Section
4.1. Following the exercise of a SARs Award, the difference between the number of Shares subject to
such Award and the number of Shares issued in such exercise shall not be included in the maximum
number of Shares available for delivery under the Plan.
Shares may be authorized or unissued shares. The Committee shall determine the appropriate
methodology for calculating the number of Shares issued pursuant to the Plan.
The following limitations shall apply to the grant of any Award to a Participant in a fiscal
year:
|
(a) |
|
Stock Options: The maximum aggregate number of Shares that may be
granted in the form of Stock Options pursuant to Awards granted in any one fiscal
year to any one Participant shall be 600,000. |
|
|
(b) |
|
SARs: The maximum aggregate number of Shares that may be granted in
the form of Stock Appreciation Rights pursuant to Awards granted in any one fiscal
year to any one Participant shall be 250,000. |
|
|
(c) |
|
Restricted Stock: The maximum aggregate number of Shares that may be
granted with respect to Awards of Restricted Stock granted in any one fiscal year
to any one Participant shall be 250,000. |
|
|
(d) |
|
Deferred Stock/Restricted Stock Unit Awards: The maximum aggregate
grant or award with respect to Awards of Deferred Stock Units made in any one
fiscal year to any one Participant may not exceed $7,000,000. The maximum
aggregate grant with respect to Awards of Restricted Stock Units made in any one
fiscal year to any one Participant may not exceed $7,000,000. |
-5-
|
(e) |
|
Other Stock Unit Awards: The maximum aggregate grant with respect to
Awards of Other Stock Units made in any one fiscal year to any one Participant may
not exceed $10,000,000. |
|
|
(f) |
|
Performance Shares Awards: The maximum aggregate grant with respect to
Awards of Performance Shares made in any one fiscal year to any one Participant
shall be equal to the Fair Market Value of 250,000 Shares (measured on the date of
grant). |
Notwithstanding anything in the Plan to the contrary and subject to adjustment as provided in
Section 4.2, the maximum aggregate number of Shares that may be granted as Awards in any one fiscal
year to a Director shall be equal to the Fair Market Value of 10,000 Shares (measured on the date
of grant) and the maximum aggregate number of Shares that may be granted as Awards to any Director
cumulatively under this Plan is 350,000.
The maximum amount that may be paid under the Annual Target Bonus Plan in any one fiscal year
to a participant in that plan shall be $2 million.
4.2 Adjustments in Authorized Shares. Upon a change in corporate capitalization, such as a
stock split, stock dividend or a corporate transaction, such as any merger, consolidation,
combination, exchange of shares or the like, separation, including a spin-off, or other
distribution of stock or property of the Company, any reorganization (whether or not such
reorganization comes within the definition of such term in Code Section 368) or any partial or
complete liquidation of the Company, such adjustment shall be made in the number and class of
Shares that may be delivered under Section 4.1, in the number and class of and/or price of Shares
subject to outstanding Awards granted under the Plan, and in the Award limits set forth in Section
4.1, as may be determined to be appropriate and equitable by the Committee, in its sole discretion,
to prevent dilution or enlargement of rights.
4.3 Adjustment of Awards Upon the Occurrence of Certain Unusual or Nonrecurring Events. The
Committee may make adjustments in the terms and conditions of, and the criteria included in, Awards
in recognition of unusual or nonrecurring events (including, without limitation, the events
described in Section 4.2 hereof) affecting the Company or the financial statements of the Company
or of changes in applicable laws, regulations, or accounting principles, whenever the Committee
determines that such adjustments are appropriate in order to prevent dilution or enlargement of the
benefits or potential benefits intended to be made available under the Plan; provided that, unless
the Committee determines otherwise at the time such adjustment is considered, no such adjustment
shall be authorized to the extent that such authority would be inconsistent with the Plans or any
Awards meeting the requirements of Section 162(m) of the Code, as from time to time amended.
Article 5. Eligibility and Participation
5.1 Eligibility. Persons eligible to participate in this Plan include all Employees and
Directors of the Company and its Subsidiaries.
-6-
5.2 Actual Participation. Subject to the provisions of the Plan, the Committee may, from time
to time, select from all eligible Employees and Directors, those to whom Awards shall be granted
and shall determine the nature and amount of each Award, provided that Incentive Stock Options
shall only be awarded to Employees of the Company or its Subsidiaries.
Article 6. Stock Options
6.1 Grant of Options. Subject to the terms and provisions of the Plan, Options may be granted
to Participants in such number, and upon such terms, and at any time and from time to time as shall
be determined by the Committee.
6.2 Award Agreement. Each Option grant shall be evidenced by an Award Agreement that shall
specify the Option Price, the duration of the Option, the number of Shares to which the Option
pertains, and such other provisions as the Committee shall determine which are not inconsistent
with the terms of the Plan.
6.3 Option Price. The Option Price for each Option shall equal the Fair Market Value of the
Shares at the time such option is granted. No ISOs will be granted to a Ten Percent Shareholder.
The Option Price may not be decreased with respect to an outstanding Option following the date of
grant and no Option will be replaced with another Option with a lower Option Price.
6.4 Duration of Options. Each Option granted to a Participant shall expire at such time as the
Committee shall determine at the time of grant, provided that an Option must expire no later than
the seventh (7th) anniversary of the date the Option was granted.
6.5 Exercise of Options. Options shall be exercisable at such times and be subject to such
restrictions and conditions as the Committee shall in each instance approve, which need not be the
same for each grant or for each Participant.
6.6 Payment. Options shall be exercised by the delivery of a written, electronic or telephonic
notice of exercise to the Company or its designated agent, setting forth the number of Shares with
respect to which the Option is to be exercised, accompanied by full payment of the Option Price for
the Shares.
Upon the exercise of any Option, the Option Price for the Shares being purchased pursuant to
the Option shall be payable to the Company in full either: (a) in cash or its equivalent; (b)
subject to the Committees approval, by delivery of previously acquired Shares having an aggregate
Fair Market Value at the time of exercise equal to the total Option Price (provided that the Shares
that are delivered must have been held by the Participant for at least six (6) months prior to
their delivery to satisfy the Option Price); (c) subject to the Committees approval, by
authorizing a third party to sell Shares (or a sufficient portion of the Shares) acquired upon
exercise of the Option and remitting to the Company a sufficient portion of the sales proceeds to
pay the Option Price; (d) subject to the Committees approval, by a combination of (a), (b), or
(c); or (e) by any other method approved by the Committee in its sole discretion. Unless otherwise
determined by the Committee, the delivery of previously acquired Shares may be done through
attestation. No fractional shares may be tendered or accepted in payment of the Option Price.
-7-
Unless otherwise determined by the Committee, cashless exercises are permitted pursuant to
Federal Reserve Boards Regulation T, subject to applicable securities law restrictions, or by any
other means which the Committee determines to be consistent with the Plans purpose and applicable
law.
Subject to any governing rules or regulations, as soon as practicable after receipt of
notification of exercise and full payment, the Company shall deliver to the Participant, in the
Participants name, Share certificates in an appropriate amount based upon the number of Shares
purchased pursuant to the Option(s).
Unless otherwise determined by the Committee, all payments under all of the methods indicated
above shall be paid in United States dollars.
6.7 Restrictions on Share Transferability. The Committee may impose such restrictions on any
Shares acquired pursuant to the exercise of an Option granted under this Article 6 as it may deem
advisable, including, without limitation, restrictions under applicable federal securities laws,
under the requirements of any stock exchange or market upon which such Shares are then listed
and/or traded, or under any blue sky or state securities laws applicable to such Shares.
6.9 Special Limitation on Grants of Incentive Stock Options. No ISO shall be granted
to an Employee under the Plan or any other ISO plan of the Company or its Subsidiaries to purchase
Shares as to which the aggregate Fair Market Value (determined as of the date of grant) of the
Shares which first become exercisable by the Employee in any calendar year exceeds $100,000. To
the extent an Option initially designated as an ISO exceeds the value limit of this Section 6.9 or
otherwise fails to satisfy the requirements applicable to ISOs, it shall be deemed a NQSO and shall
otherwise remain in full force and effect.
Article 7. Stock Appreciation Rights
7.1 Grant of SARs. Subject to the terms and conditions of the Plan, SARs may be granted to
Participants at any time and from time to time as shall be determined by the Committee.
Subject to the terms and conditions of the Plan, the Committee shall have complete discretion
in determining the number of SARs granted to each Participant and, consistent with the provisions
of the Plan, in determining the terms and conditions pertaining to such SARs.
The grant price of a SAR shall equal the Fair Market Value of a Share on the date of grant.
7.2 SAR Agreement. Each SAR grant shall be evidenced by an Award Agreement that shall specify
the grant price, the term of the SAR, and such other provisions as the Committee shall determine.
7.3 Term of SARs. The term of an SAR granted under the Plan shall be determined by the
Committee, in its sole discretion, provided that an SAR must expire no later than the seventh (7th)
anniversary of the date the SAR was granted.
-8-
7.4 Exercise of SARs. SARs may be exercised upon whatever terms and conditions the Committee,
in its sole discretion, imposes upon them.
7.6 Payment of SAR Amount. Upon exercise of an SAR, a Participant shall be entitled to receive
payment from the Company in an amount determined by multiplying:
|
(a) |
|
The amount by which the Fair Market Value of a Share on the date of
exercise exceeds the grant price of the SAR; by |
|
|
(b) |
|
The number of Shares with respect to which the SAR is exercised. |
The payment upon SAR exercise shall be in Shares. Any Shares delivered in payment shall be
deemed to have a value equal to the Fair Market Value on the date of exercise of the SAR.
Article 8. Restricted Stock
8.1 Grant of Restricted Stock. Subject to the terms and provisions of the Plan, the Committee,
at any time and from time to time, may grant Shares of Restricted Stock to Participants in such
amounts as the Committee shall determine.
8.2 Restricted Stock Agreement. Each Restricted Stock grant shall be evidenced by a Restricted
Stock Award Agreement that shall specify the Period(s) of Restriction, the number of Shares of
Restricted Stock granted, and such other provisions as the Committee shall determine which are not
inconsistent with the terms of this Plan.
8.3 Other Restrictions. The Committee may impose such other conditions and/or restrictions on
any Shares of Restricted Stock granted pursuant to the Plan as it may deem advisable including,
without limitation, a requirement that Participants pay a stipulated purchase price for each Share
of Restricted Stock, restrictions based upon the achievement of specific performance goals,
time-based restrictions on vesting following the attainment of the performance goals, time-based
restrictions, and/or restrictions under applicable federal or state securities laws.
To the extent deemed appropriate by the Committee, the Company may retain the certificates
representing Shares of Restricted Stock in the Companys possession until such time as all
conditions and/or restrictions applicable to such Shares have been satisfied.
Except as otherwise provided in the Award Agreement, Shares of Restricted Stock covered by
each Restricted Stock grant made under the Plan shall become freely transferable by the Participant
after the last day of the applicable Period of Restriction.
8.5 Voting Rights. If the Committee so determines, Participants holding Shares of Restricted
Stock granted hereunder may be granted the right to exercise full voting rights with respect to
those Shares during the Period of Restriction.
8.6 Dividends and Other Distributions. During the Period of Restriction, Participants holding
Shares of Restricted Stock granted hereunder (whether or not the Company holds the
-9-
certificate(s) representing such Shares) may, if the Committee so determines, be credited with
dividends paid with respect to the underlying Shares while they are so held. The Committee may
apply any restrictions to the dividends that the Committee deems appropriate. Without limiting the
generality of the preceding sentence, if the grant or vesting of Restricted Shares granted to a
Covered Employee is designed to comply with the requirements of the Performance-Based Exception,
the Committee may apply any restrictions it deems appropriate to the payment of dividends declared
with respect to such Restricted Shares, such that the dividends and/or the Restricted Shares
maintain eligibility for the Performance-Based Exception.
Article 9. Deferred Stock and Restricted Stock Units
9.1 Award of Deferred Stock Units. Subject to the terms and provisions of the Plan, the
Committee, at any time and from time to time, may award Deferred Stock Units to Participants in
lieu of payment of a bonus or other Award if so elected by a Participant under such terms and
conditions as the Committee shall determine, including terms that provide for the grant of Deferred
Stock Units valued in excess of the bonus or Award deferred.
9.2 Election to Receive Deferred Stock Units. A Participant must make an election to receive
Deferred Stock Units in the calendar year before the calendar year in which the services related to
the Award are first performed. The Committee may require a Participant to defer, or permit
(subject to any conditions as the Committee may from time to time establish) a Participant to elect
to defer, receipt of all or any portion of any payment of cash or Shares that otherwise would be
due to such Participant in payment or settlement of an Award under the Plan, to the extent
consistent with Section 409A of the Code. (Such payments may include, without limitation,
provisions for the payment or crediting of reasonable interest in respect of deferred payments
credited in cash, and the payment or crediting of dividend equivalents in respect of deferred
amounts credited in stock equivalents.) Settlement of any Deferred Stock Units shall be made in a
single sum of cash or Shares.
9.3 Grant of Restricted Stock Units. Subject to the terms and provisions of the Plan, the
Committee, at any time and from time to time, may grant Restricted Stock Units to Participants in
such amounts as the Committee may determine.
9.4 Restricted Stock Units Agreement. Each Restricted Stock Unit grant shall be
evidenced by a Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement that shall specify the date or dates and any
other terms and conditions on which the Restricted Stock Units may vest and such other terms and
conditions of the grant as the Committee shall determine.
9.5 Form and Timing of Payment of Restricted Stock Units. Payment of vested Restricted Stock
Units, or, if a Restricted Stock Unit Award is subject to partial vesting, the vested portion of
such Award, shall be made in a single sum of cash or Shares or a combination thereof as soon as
practicable after the Restricted Stock Units or portion of the Award vests, but in no event later
than 21/2 months after the calendar year in which vesting occurs. It is intended that a Restricted
Stock Unit Award be exempt from the application of Section 409A of the Code as a short-term
deferral.
-10-
Article 10. Other Stock Unit Awards
10.1 Grant of Other Stock Unit Awards. Subject to the terms of the Plan, Other Stock Unit
Awards that are valued in whole or in part by reference to, or are otherwise based on, Shares or
other property, may be granted to Participants, either alone or in addition to other Awards granted
under the Plan, and such Other Stock Units shall also be available as a form of payment in the
settlement of other Awards granted under the Plan. Other Stock Units shall be granted upon such
terms, and at any time and from time to time, as shall be determined by the Committee.
10.2 Award Agreement. Each Other Stock Unit grant shall be evidenced by an Other Stock Unit
Agreement that shall specify the restrictions upon such Other Stock Units, if any, the number of
Other Stock Units granted, and such other provisions as the Committee shall determine which are not
inconsistent with the terms of this Plan.
Article 11. Performance Shares
11.1 Grant of Performance Shares Awards. Subject to the terms of the Plan, Performance Shares
Awards may be granted to Participants in such amounts and upon such terms, and at any time and from
time to time, as shall be determined by the Committee.
11.2 Award Agreement. At the Committees discretion, each grant of Performance Shares Awards
may be evidenced by an Award Agreement that shall specify the initial value, the duration of the
Award, the performance measures, if any, applicable to the Award, and such other provisions as the
Committee shall determine which are not inconsistent with the terms of the Plan.
11.3 Value of Performance Shares Awards. Each Performance Share shall have an initial value
equal to the Fair Market Value of a Share on the date of grant. The Committee shall set
performance goals in its discretion which, depending on the extent to which they are met, will
determine the number and/or value of Performance Shares Awards that will be paid out to the
Participant. For purposes of this Article 11, the time period during which the performance goals
must be met shall be called a Performance Period.
11.4 Earning of Performance Shares Awards. Subject to the terms of this Plan, after the
applicable Performance Period has ended, the holder of Performance Shares Awards shall be entitled
to receive a payout based on the number and value of Performance Shares Awards earned by the
Participant over the Performance Period, to be determined as a function of the extent to which the
corresponding performance goals have been achieved.
11.5 Form and Timing of Payment of Performance Shares Awards. Payment of earned Performance
Shares Awards shall be as determined by the Committee and, if applicable, as evidenced in the
related Award Agreement. Subject to the terms of the Plan, the Committee, in its sole discretion,
may pay earned Performance Shares Awards in the form of cash or in Shares (or in a combination
thereof) that have an aggregate Fair Market Value equal to the value
-11-
of the earned Performance Shares Awards at the close of the applicable Performance Period.
Such Shares may be delivered subject to any restrictions deemed appropriate by the Committee. No
fractional shares will be issued. The determination of the Committee with respect to the form of
payout of such Awards shall be set forth in the Award Agreement pertaining to the grant of the
Award or the resolutions establishing the Award.
Unless otherwise provided by the Committee, Participants holding Performance Shares shall be
entitled to receive dividend units with respect to dividends declared with respect to the Shares
represented by such Performance Shares.
Article 12. Performance Measures
Unless and until the Committee proposes for shareholder vote and the Companys shareholders
approve a change in the general performance measures set forth in this Article 12, the attainment
of which may determine the degree of payout and/or vesting with respect to Awards to Covered
Employees that are designed to qualify for the Performance-Based Exception, the performance
measure(s) to be used for purposes of such grants shall be chosen from among: revenue, earnings
per share, operating income, net income (before or after taxes), cash flow (including, but not
limited to, operating cash flow and free cash flow), gross profit, growth in any of the preceding
measures, gross profit return on investment, gross margin return on investment, working capital,
gross margins, EBIT, EBITDA, return on equity, return on assets, return on capital, revenue growth,
total shareholder return, economic value added, customer satisfaction, technology leadership,
number of new patents, employee retention, market share, market segment share, product release
schedules, new product innovation, cost reduction through advanced technology, brand
recognition/acceptance, and product ship targets. Additionally, the Committee may exclude the
impact of an event or occurrence which the Committee determines should appropriately be excluded,
including an event not within the reasonable control of the Companys management.
Performance measures may be set either at the corporate level, subsidiary level, division
level, or business unit level.
Awards that are designed to qualify for the Performance-Based Exception, and that are held by
Covered Employees, may not be adjusted upward (the Committee shall retain the discretion to adjust
such Awards downward).
If applicable tax and/or securities laws change to permit Committee discretion to alter the
governing performance measures without obtaining shareholder approval of such changes, the
Committee shall have sole discretion to make such changes without obtaining shareholder approval.
Article 13. Rights of Participants
13.1 Employment. Nothing in the Plan shall confer upon any Participant any right to continue
in the Companys or its Subsidiaries employ, or as a Director, or interfere with or limit in any
way the right of the Company or its Subsidiaries to terminate any Participants employment or
directorship at any time.
-12-
13.2 Participation. No Employee or Director shall have the right to be selected to receive an
Award under this Plan, or, having been so selected, to be selected to receive a future Award.
13.3 Rights as a Stockholder. Except as provided in Sections 8.5, 8.6 and 11.5 or in the
applicable Award Agreement consistent with Articles 8, 9, 10, or 11, a Participant shall have none
of the rights of a shareholder with respect to shares of Company common stock covered by any Award
until the Participant becomes the record holder of such Shares.
13.4 Nontransferability. Unless otherwise set forth by the Committee in an Award Agreement,
Awards (except for vested shares) shall not be transferable by a Participant except by will or the
laws of descent and distribution (except pursuant to a Beneficiary designation) and shall be
exercisable during the lifetime of a Participant only by such Participant or his or her guardian or
legal representative. Under no circumstances will an Award be transferable for value or
consideration. A Participants rights under the Plan may not be pledged, mortgaged, hypothecated,
or otherwise encumbered, and shall not be subject to claims of the Participants creditors.
Article 14. Termination of Employment/Directorship
14.1 Effect on Options. Upon termination of the Participants employment or directorship for
any reason other than Disability, death, or, in the case of NQSOs, retirement, an Option granted to
the Participant may be exercised by the Participant or permitted transferee at any time on or prior
to the earlier of the expiration date of the Option or the expiration of three (3) months after the
date of termination but only if, and to the extent that, the Participant was entitled to exercise
the Option at the date of termination.
14.2
Effect of Retirement on NQSOs. Upon termination of the Participants employment or
directorship due to retirement (as defined in the Award Agreement), a NQSO granted to the
Participant may be exercised by the Participant or permitted transferee at any time on or prior to
the earlier of the expiration date of the Option or one of the two following deadlines: (a) in the case of Options granted prior to July
29, 2009, the expiration of two (2) years after the date of termination due to retirement, or (b)
in the case of Options granted after July 29, 2009, the expiration of five (5) years after the date
of termination due to retirement. The term retirement has the meaning given to it in the Award
Agreement. In either case, the Participant may only exercise the NQSO if, and to the extent that,
the Participant was entitled to exercise the Nonqualified Stock Option at the date of termination.
14.3 Effects on Other Awards. Upon termination of the Participants employment or
directorship for any reason other than Disability or death, all Awards other than Options shall be
treated as set forth in the applicable Award Agreement. If the employment or directorship of a
Participant terminates by reason of the Participants Disability or death, all Awards shall be
treated as set forth in the applicable Award Agreements.
14.4 Leaves of Absence. Unless otherwise determined by the Committee, an authorized leave of
absence pursuant to a written agreement or other leave entitling an Employee to reemployment in a
comparable position by law or rule shall not constitute a termination of
-13-
employment for purposes of the Plan unless the Employee does not return at or before the end
of the authorized leave or within the period for which re-employment is guaranteed by law or rule.
14.5 Definition of Termination. For purposes of this Article, a termination includes an
event which causes a Participant to lose his eligibility to participate in the Plan (e.g., an
individual is employed by a company that ceases to be a Subsidiary). In the case of a nonemployee
director, the meaning of termination includes the date that the individual ceases to be a
director of the Company or its Subsidiaries.
14.6 Exceptions. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Committee has the authority to prescribe
different rules that apply upon the termination of employment of a particular Participant, which
shall be memorialized in the Participants original or amended Award Agreement or similar document.
14.7 Termination of Awards. An Award that remains unexercised after the latest date it could
have been exercised under any of the foregoing provisions or under the terms of the Award shall be
forfeited.
Article 15. Change in Control
In the event of (1) any sale or conveyance to another entity of all or substantially all of
the property and assets of the Company or (2) a Change in Control, unless otherwise specifically
prohibited under applicable laws, or by the rules and regulations of any governing governmental
agencies or national securities exchange or trading system, or unless the Committee shall otherwise
specify in the Award Agreement, the Board, in its sole discretion, may:
|
(a) |
|
elect to terminate Options or SARs in exchange for a cash payment
equal to the amount by which the Fair Market Value of the Shares subject to such
Option to the extent the Option or SAR has vested exceeds the exercise price
with respect to such Shares; |
|
|
(b) |
|
elect to terminate Options or SARs provided that each Participant is
first notified of and given the opportunity to exercise his/her vested Options
for a specified period of time (of not less than 15 days) from the date of
notification and before the Option or SAR is terminated; |
|
|
(c) |
|
permit Awards to be assumed by a new parent corporation or a successor
corporation (or its parent) and replaced with a comparable Award of the parent
corporation or successor corporation (or its parent); |
|
|
(d) |
|
amend an Award Agreement or take such other action with respect to an
Award that it deems appropriate; or |
|
|
(e) |
|
implement any combination of the foregoing. |
-14-
Article 16. Amendment, Modification, and Termination
16.1 Amendment, Modification, and Termination. Subject to the terms of the Plan, the Board may
at any time and from time to time, alter, amend, suspend, or terminate the Plan in whole or in
part.
16.2 Awards Previously Granted. Notwithstanding any other provision of the Plan to the
contrary, no termination, amendment, or modification of the Plan shall adversely affect in any
material way any Award previously granted under the Plan, without the written consent of the
Participant holding such Award. Except in connection with a corporate transaction involving the
company (including, without limitation, any stock dividend, stock split, extraordinary cash
dividend, recapitalization, reorganization, merger, consolidation, split-up, spin-off, combination,
or exchange of shares), the terms of outstanding awards may not be amended to reduce the exercise
price of outstanding Options or SARs or cancel outstanding Options or SARS in exchange for cash,
other awards or Options or SARs with an exercise price that is less than the exercise price of the
original Options or SARs without stockholder approval.
16.3 Shareholder Approval Required for Certain Amendments. Shareholder approval will be
required for any amendment of the Plan that does any of the following: (a) increases the maximum
number of Shares subject to the Plan; (b) changes the designation of the class of persons eligible
to receive ISOs under the Plan; or (c) modifies the Plan in a manner that requires shareholder
approval under applicable law or the rules of a stock exchange or trading system on which Shares
are traded.
Article 17. Withholding
The Company shall have the power and the right to deduct or withhold, or require a Participant
to remit to the Company, an amount sufficient to satisfy any applicable taxes (including social
security or social charges), domestic or foreign, required by law or regulation to be withheld with
respect to any taxable event arising as a result of this Plan. The Participant may satisfy,
totally or in part, such Participants obligations pursuant to this Section 17 by electing to have
Shares withheld, to redeliver Shares acquired under an Award, or to deliver previously owned Shares
that have been held for at least six (6) months, provided that the election is made in writing on
or prior to (i) the date of exercise, in the case of Options or SARs; (ii) the date of payment, in
the case of Performance Shares/Deferred Stock Units/Restricted Stock Units; or (iii) the expiration
of the Period of Restriction in the case of Restricted Stock. Any election made under this Section
17 may be disapproved by the Committee at any time in its sole discretion. If an election is
disapproved by the Committee, the Participant must satisfy his obligations pursuant to this
paragraph in cash.
Article 18. Successors
All obligations of the Company under the Plan with respect to Awards granted hereunder shall
be binding on any successor to the Company, whether the existence of such successor is the
-15-
result of a direct or indirect purchase, through merger, consolidation, or otherwise, of all
or substantially all of the business, stock and/or assets of the Company.
Article 19. General Provisions
19.1 Gender and Number. Except where otherwise indicated by the context, any masculine term
used herein also shall include the feminine; the plural shall include the singular and the singular
shall include the plural.
19.2 Severability. If any provision of the Plan shall be held illegal or invalid for any
reason, the illegality or invalidity shall not affect the remaining parts of the Plan, and the Plan
shall be construed and enforced as if the illegal or invalid provision had not been included.
19.3 Requirements of Law. The granting of Awards and the issuance of Shares under the Plan
shall be subject to all applicable laws, rules, and regulations, and to such approvals by any
governmental agencies or national securities exchanges as may be required.
19.4 Securities Law Compliance. With respect to Insiders, transactions under this Plan are
intended to comply with all applicable conditions of Rule 16b-3 or its successors under the
Exchange Act, unless determined otherwise by the Board. To the extent any provision of the Plan or
action by the Committee fails to so comply, it shall be deemed null and void, to the extent
permitted by law and deemed advisable by the Board.
19.5 Listing. The Company may use reasonable endeavors to register Shares issued pursuant to
Awards with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission or to effect compliance with the
registration, qualification, and listing requirements of any state or foreign securities laws,
stock exchange, or trading system.
19.6 Inability to Obtain Authority. The inability of the Company to obtain authority from any
regulatory body having jurisdiction, which authority is deemed by the Companys counsel to be
necessary to the lawful issuance and sale of any Shares hereunder, shall relieve the Company of any
liability in respect of the failure to issue or sell such Shares as to which such requisite
authority shall not have been obtained.
19.7 No Additional Rights. Neither the Award nor any benefits arising under this Plan shall
constitute part of an employment contract between the Participant and the Company or any
Subsidiary, and accordingly, subject to Section 16.2, this Plan and the benefits hereunder may be
terminated at any time in the sole and exclusive discretion of the Committee without giving rise to
liability on the part of the Company for severance payments.
19.8 Noncertificated Shares. To the extent that the Plan provides for issuance of certificates
to reflect the transfer of Shares, the transfer of such Shares may be effected on a noncertificated
basis, to the extent not prohibited by applicable law or the rules of any stock exchange or trading
system.
-16-
19.9 Governing Law. The Plan and each Award Agreement shall be governed by the laws of
Massachusetts, excluding any conflicts or choice of law rule or principle that might otherwise
refer construction or interpretation of the Plan to the substantive law of another jurisdiction.
Unless otherwise provided in the Award Agreement, recipients of an Award under the Plan are deemed
to submit to the exclusive jurisdiction and venue of the federal or state courts whose jurisdiction
covers Massachusetts, to resolve any and all issues that may arise out of or relate to the Plan or
any related Award Agreement.
19.10 Compliance with Code Section 409A. No Award that is subject to Section 409A of the
Code shall provide for deferral of compensation that does not comply with Section 409A of the Code,
unless the Board, at the time of grant, specifically provides that the Award is not intended to
comply with Section 409A of the Code. Notwithstanding any provision in the Plan to the contrary,
with respect to any Award subject to Section 409A, distributions on account of a separation from
service may not be made to Key Employees before the date which is six (6) months after the date of
separation from service (or, if earlier, the date of death of the employee).
-17-
|
|
|
Dated as of July 27, 2005 |
Haemonetics Corporation |
Amended July 31, 2008, July 29, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ Brad Nutter
|
|
|
|
Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date of Shareholder Approval: July 27, 2005
Amendment to Section 4.1 Approved by Shareholders: July 31, 2008
Amendment to Article 14 Approved by Compensation Committee under delegation from the Board of
Directors: July 29, 2009
-18-
exv31w1
EXHIBIT 31.1
CERTIFICATION
I, Brian Concannon, certify that:
1. |
|
I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Haemonetics Corporation; |
|
2. |
|
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report; |
|
3. |
|
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented
in this report; |
|
4. |
|
The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: |
|
a) |
|
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared; |
|
|
b) |
|
Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such
internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to
provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and
the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles; |
|
|
c) |
|
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and |
|
|
d) |
|
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect the
registrants internal control over financial reporting; and |
5. |
|
The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions): |
|
a) |
|
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely
to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and |
|
|
b) |
|
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting. |
|
|
|
|
|
Date: November 4, 2009 |
/s/ Brian Concannon
|
|
|
Brian Concannon, President and Chief Executive |
|
|
Officer (Principal Executive Officer) |
|
exv31w2
EXHIBIT 31.2
CERTIFICATION
I, Christopher Lindop, certify that:
1. |
|
I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Haemonetics Corporation; |
|
2. |
|
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report; |
|
3. |
|
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented
in this report; |
|
4. |
|
The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: |
|
a) |
|
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared; |
|
|
b) |
|
Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such
internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to
provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and
the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles; |
|
|
c) |
|
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and |
|
|
d) |
|
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect the
registrants internal control over financial reporting; and |
5. |
|
The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions): |
|
a) |
|
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely
to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and |
|
|
b) |
|
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting. |
|
|
|
|
|
Date: November 4, 2009 |
/s/ Christopher Lindop
|
|
|
Christopher Lindop, Chief Financial Officer and |
|
|
Vice President Business Development
(Principal Financial Officer) |
|
exv32w1
EXHIBIT 32.1
Certification Pursuant To
18 USC. Section 1350,
As Adopted Pursuant To
Section 906 of the Sarbanes/Oxley Act of 2002
In connection with the Quarterly Report of Haemonetics Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for
the period ending September 26, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report), I, Brian Concannon, President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, that this
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 and that the information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|
|
|
|
|
Date: November 4, 2009 |
/s/ Brian Concannon
|
|
|
Brian Concannon, |
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form
within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided
to Haemonetics and will be retained by Haemonetics and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
exv32w2
EXHIBIT 32.2
Certification Pursuant To
18 USC. Section 1350,
As Adopted Pursuant To
Section 906 of the Sarbanes/Oxley Act of 2002
In connection with the Quarterly Report of Haemonetics Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for
the period ending September 26, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report), I, Christopher Lindop, Chief Financial Officer and Vice President
Business Development of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of
Title 18, United States Code, that this Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in this
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: November 4, 2009 |
/s/ Christopher Lindop
|
|
|
Christopher Lindop, |
|
|
Chief Financial Officer and Vice President
Business Development |
|
|
A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form
within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided
to Haemonetics and will be retained by Haemonetics and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.