HAE Q1, Jun 2016 Doc
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
|
| | |
Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
For the quarter ended: June 27, 2015
Commission File Number: 001-14041
HAEMONETICS CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
| | |
Massachusetts (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | | 04-2882273 (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
400 Wood Road, Braintree, MA 02184
(Address of principal executive offices)
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (781) 848-7100
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1.) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) (2.) has been subject to the filing requirements for at least the past 90 days.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definition of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act (Check one):
|
| | | | | | |
Large accelerated filer þ | | Accelerated filer o | | Non-accelerated filer o | | Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.)
The number of shares of $0.01 par value common stock outstanding as of June 27, 2015: 50,886,489
HAEMONETICS CORPORATION
INDEX
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
HAEMONETICS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF LOSS AND COMPREHENSIVE LOSS
(Unaudited in thousands, except per share data)
|
| | | | | | | |
| Three Months Ended |
| June 27, 2015 | | June 28, 2014 |
Net revenues | $ | 213,413 |
| | $ | 224,488 |
|
Cost of goods sold | 110,874 |
| | 118,210 |
|
Gross profit | 102,539 |
| | 106,278 |
|
Operating expenses: | | | |
Research and development | 11,321 |
| | 15,382 |
|
Selling, general and administrative | 87,612 |
| | 92,562 |
|
Total operating expenses | 98,933 |
| | 107,944 |
|
Operating income (loss) | 3,606 |
| | (1,666 | ) |
Interest and other expense, net | (2,009 | ) | | (2,543 | ) |
Income (loss) before provision for (benefit from) income taxes | 1,597 |
| | (4,209 | ) |
Provision for (benefit from) income taxes | 1,864 |
| | (560 | ) |
Net loss | $ | (267 | ) | | $ | (3,649 | ) |
| | | |
Net loss per share - basic | $ | (0.01 | ) | | $ | (0.07 | ) |
Net loss per share - diluted | $ | (0.01 | ) | | $ | (0.07 | ) |
| | | |
Weighted average shares outstanding | | | |
Basic | 51,360 |
| | 51,741 |
|
Diluted | 51,360 |
| | 51,741 |
|
| | | |
Comprehensive loss | $ | (2,627 | ) | | $ | (4,495 | ) |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
HAEMONETICS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands, except share data)
|
| | | | | | | |
| June 27, 2015 | | March 28, 2015 |
| (Unaudited) | | |
ASSETS | | | |
Current assets: | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 112,204 |
| | $ | 160,662 |
|
Accounts receivable, less allowance of $1,805 at June 27, 2015 and $1,749 at March 28, 2015 | 139,103 |
| | 145,827 |
|
Inventories, net | 211,131 |
| | 211,077 |
|
Deferred tax asset, net | 12,680 |
| | 12,608 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets | 33,243 |
| | 40,103 |
|
Total current assets | 508,361 |
| | 570,277 |
|
Net property, plant and equipment | 328,882 |
| | 321,948 |
|
Intangible assets, less accumulated amortization of $141,945 at June 27, 2015 and $133,175 at March 28, 2015 | 241,873 |
| | 244,588 |
|
Goodwill | 334,187 |
| | 334,310 |
|
Deferred tax asset, long term | 3,080 |
| | 3,023 |
|
Other long-term assets | 11,028 |
| | 11,271 |
|
Total assets | $ | 1,427,411 |
| | $ | 1,485,417 |
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY | | | |
Current liabilities: | | | |
Notes payable and current maturities of long-term debt | $ | 32,396 |
| | $ | 21,522 |
|
Accounts payable | 42,155 |
| | 48,425 |
|
Accrued payroll and related costs | 40,092 |
| | 51,115 |
|
Accrued taxes | 2,780 |
| | 3,819 |
|
Other liabilities | 52,342 |
| | 64,211 |
|
Total current liabilities | 169,765 |
| | 189,092 |
|
Long-term debt, net of current maturities | 399,453 |
| | 406,369 |
|
Long-term deferred tax liability | 34,354 |
| | 32,097 |
|
Other long-term liabilities | 32,192 |
| | 31,737 |
|
Stockholders’ equity: | | | |
Common stock, $0.01 par value; Authorized — 150,000,000 shares; Issued and outstanding — 50,886,489 shares at June 27, 2015 and 51,670,969 shares at March 28, 2015 | 509 |
| | 517 |
|
Additional paid-in capital | 427,878 |
| | 426,964 |
|
Retained earnings | 387,344 |
| | 420,365 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss | (24,084 | ) | | (21,724 | ) |
Total stockholders’ equity | 791,647 |
| | 826,122 |
|
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity | $ | 1,427,411 |
| | $ | 1,485,417 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
HAEMONETICS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited in thousands) |
| | | | | | | |
| Three Months Ended |
| June 27, 2015 | | June 28, 2014 |
Cash Flows from Operating Activities: | | | |
Net loss | $ | (267 | ) | | $ | (3,649 | ) |
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by operating activities: | | | |
Non-cash items: | | | |
Depreciation and amortization | 22,255 |
| | 20,511 |
|
Amortization of financing costs | 222 |
| | 347 |
|
Stock compensation expense | 3,164 |
| | 3,489 |
|
(Gain)/loss on sale of property, plant and equipment | (25 | ) | | 414 |
|
Unrealized (loss)/gain from hedging activities | (186 | ) | | 104 |
|
Change in fair value of contingent consideration | 83 |
| | 224 |
|
Asset write-down | — |
| | 261 |
|
Change in operating assets and liabilities: | | | |
Change in accounts receivable, net | 6,574 |
| | 7,918 |
|
Change in inventories | (718 | ) | | (9,569 | ) |
Change in prepaid income taxes | (369 | ) | | (313 | ) |
Change in other assets and other liabilities | 3,699 |
| | (589 | ) |
Tax benefit of exercise of stock options | — |
| | 285 |
|
Change in accounts payable and accrued expenses | (25,182 | ) | | (5,695 | ) |
Net cash provided by operating activities | 9,250 |
| | 13,738 |
|
Cash Flows from Investing Activities: | | | |
Capital expenditures on property, plant and equipment | (24,246 | ) | | (37,085 | ) |
Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment | 116 |
| | 64 |
|
Other acquisitions and investments | (3,000 | ) | | — |
|
Net cash used in investing activities | (27,130 | ) | | (37,021 | ) |
Cash Flows from Financing Activities: | | | |
Payments on long-term real estate mortgage | (276 | ) | | (254 | ) |
Net increase in short-term loans | 4,380 |
| | 1,687 |
|
Repayment of term loan borrowings | — |
| | (8,531 | ) |
Proceeds from employee stock purchase plan | 2,263 |
| | 2,530 |
|
Proceeds from exercise of stock options | 2,893 |
| | 2,223 |
|
Share repurchases | (39,032 | ) | | (26,466 | ) |
Net cash used in financing activities | (29,772 | ) | | (28,811 | ) |
Effect of exchange rates on cash and cash equivalents | (806 | ) | | (432 | ) |
Net Change in Cash and Cash Equivalents | (48,458 | ) | | (52,526 | ) |
Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Period | 160,662 |
| | 192,469 |
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Period | $ | 112,204 |
| | $ | 139,943 |
|
Supplemental Disclosures of Cash Flow Information: | | | |
Interest paid | $ | 2,068 |
| | $ | 2,011 |
|
Income taxes paid | $ | 1,625 |
| | $ | 2,097 |
|
Transfers from inventory to fixed assets for placement of Haemonetics equipment | $ | 2,925 |
| | $ | 2,443 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
HAEMONETICS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. BASIS OF PRESENTATION
Our accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) in the United States for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by GAAP for complete financial statements. In the opinion of our management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. All intercompany transactions have been eliminated. Operating results for the three months ended are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the full fiscal year ending April 2, 2016, or any other interim period. Operating results for the three months ended June 27, 2015 include the correction of an understatement of the provision for income taxes in fiscal 2015, which was determined to be immaterial to all periods impacted. Absent this correction, the provision for income taxes in the three months ended June 27, 2015 would have been $1.0 million lower than the amount included in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Loss and Comprehensive Loss. This understatement was due to an error in the computation of the provision for income taxes due to a recent change in the capital gains tax rate in Puerto Rico related to certain deferred tax liabilities. These unaudited consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with our audited consolidated financial statements and footnotes included in our annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 28, 2015.
We consider events or transactions that occur after the balance sheet date but prior to the issuance of the financial statements to provide additional evidence relative to certain estimates or to identify matters that require additional disclosure. We had no significant subsequent events.
Our fiscal year ends on the Saturday closest to the last day of March. Fiscal year 2016 includes 53 weeks with each of the first three quarters having 13 weeks and the fourth quarter having 14 weeks. Fiscal year 2015 included 52 weeks with each quarter having 13 weeks.
2. RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
Standards Implemented
In April 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2014-08, Presentation of Financial Statements (Topic 205) and Property, Plant, and Equipment (Topic 360): Reporting Discontinued Operations and Disclosures of Disposals of Components of an Entity. ASU No. 2014-08 limits the requirement to report discontinued operations to disposals of components of an entity that represent strategic shifts that have (or will have) a major effect on an entity’s operations and financial results. The amendments also require expanded disclosures concerning discontinued operations and disclosures of certain financial results attributable to a disposal of a significant component of an entity that does not qualify for discontinued operations reporting. The amendments in ASU No. 2014-08 are effective prospectively for reporting periods beginning on or after December 15, 2014, with early adoption permitted. Management does not believe that the adoption of ASU No. 2014-08 will have a material effect on our Financial Statements. We adopted ASU No. 2014-08 beginning in the first quarter of fiscal 2016. The adoption of ASU No. 2014-08 did not impact our financial position or results of operations.
Standards to be Implemented
In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606). ASU No. 2014-09 stipulates that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. To achieve this core principle, an entity should apply the following steps: (1) identify the contract(s) with a customer; (2) identify the performance obligations in the contract; (3) determine the transaction price; (4) allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract; and (5) recognize revenue when (or as) the entity satisfies a performance obligation. ASU No. 2014-09 will be effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim periods within those reporting periods, with early adoption not permitted. On July 9, 2015, the FASB affirmed its proposal to defer the effective date by one year to December 15, 2017 for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after that date and permitted early adoption of the standard, but not before the original effective date of December 15, 2016. The FASB expects to issue its final ASU formally amending the effective date by the end of the third quarter of 2015. The impact of adopting ASU No. 2014-09 on our financial position and results of operations is being assessed by management.
In June 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-12, Compensation—Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Accounting for Share-Based Payments When the Terms of an Award Provide That a Performance Target Could Be Achieved after the Requisite Service Period. ASU No. 2014-12 requires that a performance target that affects vesting and could be achieved after the requisite service period be treated as a performance condition. A reporting entity should apply existing guidance in ASC 718, Compensation—Stock Compensation, as it relates to such awards. ASU No. 2014-12 is effective in our first quarter of fiscal 2017 with early adoption permitted using either of two methods: (i) prospective to all awards granted or modified after the effective date; or (ii) retrospective to all awards with performance targets that are outstanding as of the beginning of the earliest annual period presented in the financial statements and to all new or modified awards thereafter, with the cumulative effect of applying ASU No. 2014-12 as an adjustment to the opening retained earnings balance as of the beginning of the earliest annual period presented in the financial statements. Management does not believe that the adoption of ASU No. 2014-12 will have a material effect on our financial position or results of operations.
In August 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-15, Presentation of Financial Statements—Going Concern (Subtopic 205-40): Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern. ASU No. 2014-15 defines management's responsibility to assess an entity's ability to continue as a going concern, and to provide related footnote disclosures in certain circumstances. This guidance will be effective for all entities in the first annual period ending after December 15, 2016; however, early adoption is permitted. Management does not believe that the adoption of ASU No. 2014-15 will have a material effect on our financial position or results of operations.
In January 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-01, Income Statement-Extraordinary and Unusual Items (Subtopic 225-20): Simplifying Income Statement Presentation by Eliminating the Concept of Extraordinary Items. ASU No. 2015-01 eliminates from GAAP the concept of extraordinary items. An entity will no longer be required to (1) segregate an extraordinary item from the results of ordinary operations; (2) separately present an extraordinary item on its income statement, net of tax, after income from continuing operations; and (3) disclose income taxes and earnings-per-share data applicable to an extraordinary item. ASU No. 2015-01 will be effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2015. An entity may apply the amendments prospectively or retrospectively to all prior periods presented in the financial statements. Early adoption is permitted provided that the guidance is applied from the beginning of the fiscal year of adoption. Management does not believe that the adoption of ASU No. 2015-01 will have a material effect on our financial position or results of operations.
In February 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-02, Consolidation (Topic 810): Amendments to the Consolidation Analysis. ASU No. 2015-02 amended the process that a reporting entity must perform to determine whether it should consolidate certain types of legal entities. ASU No. 2015-02 is effective for annual periods ending after December 15, 2015, and for annual periods and interim periods thereafter with early adoption permitted. Management does not believe that the adoption of ASU No. 2015-02 will have a material effect on our financial position or results of operations.
In April 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-03, Interest—Imputation of Interest (Subtopic 835-30): Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs. ASU No. 2015-03 requires that debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability be presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of that debt liability, consistent with debt discounts. ASU No. 2015-03 is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2015, and interim periods within those annual periods. Management does not believe that the adoption of ASU No. 2015-03 will have a material effect on our financial position or results of operations.
In April 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-04, Compensation—Retirement Benefits (Topic 715): Practical Expedient for the Measurement Date of an Employer’s Defined Benefit Obligation and Plan Assets. ASU No. 2015-04 provides a practical expedient, for an entity with a fiscal year-end that does not coincide with a month-end, that permits the entity to measure defined benefit plan assets and obligations using the month-end that is closest to the entity's fiscal year-end and apply that practical expedient consistently from year to year. ASU No. 2015-04 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2015, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early application is permitted. Management does not believe that the adoption of ASU No. 2015-04 will have a material effect on our financial position or results of operations.
In April 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-05, Intangibles—Goodwill and Other—Internal-Use Software (Subtopic 350-40): Customer’s Accounting for Fees Paid in a Cloud Computing Arrangement. ASU No. 2015-05 will help entities evaluate the accounting for fees paid by a customer in a cloud computing arrangement. ASU No. 2015-05 is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2015 with early adoption permitted. Management does not believe that the adoption of ASU No. 2015-05 will have a material effect on our financial position or results of operations.
3. EARNINGS PER SHARE (“EPS”)
The following table provides a reconciliation of the numerators and denominators of the basic and diluted earnings per share computations.
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended |
(In thousands, except per share amounts) | | June 27, 2015 | | June 28, 2014 |
Basic EPS | | | | |
Net loss | | $ | (267 | ) | | $ | (3,649 | ) |
Weighted average shares | | 51,360 |
| | 51,741 |
|
Basic loss per share | | $ | (0.01 | ) | | $ | (0.07 | ) |
Diluted EPS | | | | |
Net loss | | $ | (267 | ) | | $ | (3,649 | ) |
Basic weighted average shares | | 51,360 |
| | 51,741 |
|
Net effect of common stock equivalents | | — |
| | — |
|
Diluted weighted average shares | | 51,360 |
| | 51,741 |
|
Diluted loss per share | | $ | (0.01 | ) | | $ | (0.07 | ) |
Basic earnings per share is calculated using our weighted-average outstanding common shares. Diluted earnings per share is calculated using our weighted-average outstanding common shares including the dilutive effect of stock awards as determined under the treasury stock method. For the three months ended June 27, 2015 and June 28, 2014, we recognized a net loss; therefore we excluded the impact of outstanding stock awards from the diluted loss per share calculation as their inclusion would have an anti-dilutive effect.
4. STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION
Total stock-based compensation expense of $3.2 million and $3.5 million was recognized for the three months ended June 27, 2015 and June 28, 2014, respectively. There was no income tax benefit recognized for the three months ended June 27, 2015 and the related income tax benefit recognized was $1.1 million for the three months ended June 28, 2014.
The weighted average fair value for our options granted was $9.98 and $7.49 per share for the three months ended June 27, 2015 and June 28, 2014, respectively. The assumptions utilized for estimating the fair value of option grants during the periods presented are as follows:
|
| | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended |
| | June 27, 2015 | | June 28, 2014 |
Stock Options Black-Scholes assumptions (weighted average): | | | | |
Volatility | | 22.38 | % | | 22.62 | % |
Expected life (years) | | 4.9 |
| | 4.9 |
|
Risk-free interest rate | | 1.75 | % | | 1.64 | % |
Dividend yield | | — | % | | — | % |
As of June 27, 2015, there was $21.9 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested equity based compensation, including stock options, restricted stock units, market stock units and performance share units. This cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 2.13 years.
During the three months ended June 27, 2015 and June 28, 2014, there were 73,360 and 96,853 shares, respectively, purchased under the Employee Stock Purchase Plan at an average price of $30.84 and $25.85 per share, respectively.
5. PRODUCT WARRANTIES
We generally provide warranty on parts and labor for one year after the sale and installation of each device. We also warrant our disposables products through their use or expiration. We estimate our potential warranty expense based on our historical warranty experience and periodically assess the adequacy of our warranty accrual, making adjustments as necessary.
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended |
(In thousands) | | June 27, 2015 | | June 28, 2014 |
Warranty accrual as of the beginning of the period | | $ | 531 |
| | $ | 590 |
|
Warranty provision | | 172 |
| | 75 |
|
Warranty spending | | (266 | ) | | (154 | ) |
Warranty accrual as of the end of the period | | $ | 437 |
| | $ | 511 |
|
6. INVENTORIES
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market and include the cost of material, labor and manufacturing overhead. Cost is determined using the first-in, first-out method.
|
| | | | | | | | |
(In thousands) | | June 27, 2015 | | March 28, 2015 |
Raw materials | | $ | 69,586 |
| | $ | 71,794 |
|
Work-in-process | | 10,702 |
| | 12,462 |
|
Finished goods | | 130,843 |
| | 126,821 |
|
| | $ | 211,131 |
| | $ | 211,077 |
|
7. DERIVATIVES AND FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
We manufacture, market and sell our products globally. For the three months ended June 27, 2015, approximately 43.4% of our sales were generated outside the U.S. in local currencies. We also incur certain manufacturing, marketing and selling costs in international markets in local currency.
Accordingly, our earnings and cash flows are exposed to market risk from changes in foreign currency exchange rates relative to the U.S. Dollar, our reporting currency. We have a program in place that is designed to mitigate our exposure to changes in foreign currency exchange rates. That program includes the use of derivative financial instruments to minimize, for a period of time, the impact on our financial results from changes in foreign exchange rates. We utilize foreign currency forward contracts to hedge the anticipated cash flows from transactions denominated in foreign currencies, primarily the Japanese Yen and the Euro, and to a lesser extent the Swiss Franc, Australian Dollar, British Pound Sterling, Canadian Dollar and the Mexican Peso. This does not eliminate the impact of the volatility of foreign exchange rates, but because we generally enter into forward contracts one year out, rates are fixed for a one-year period, thereby facilitating financial planning and resource allocation.
Designated Foreign Currency Hedge Contracts
All of our designated foreign currency hedge contracts as of June 27, 2015 and March 28, 2015 were cash flow hedges under ASC Topic 815, Derivatives and Hedging. We record the effective portion of any change in the fair value of designated foreign currency hedge contracts in Other Comprehensive Income until the related third-party transaction occurs. Once the related third-party transaction occurs, we reclassify the effective portion of any related gain or loss on the designated foreign currency hedge contracts to earnings. In the event the hedged forecasted transaction does not occur, or it becomes probable that it will not occur, we would reclassify the amount of any gain or loss on the related cash flow hedge to earnings at that time. We had designated foreign currency hedge contracts outstanding in the contract amount of $132.1 million as of June 27, 2015 and $145.8 million as of March 28, 2015.
During the three months ended June 27, 2015, we recognized net gains of $4.0 million in earnings from our cash flow hedges, compared to recognized net gains of $0.8 million during the three months ended June 28, 2014. For the three months ended June 27, 2015, a $1.2 million gain, net of tax, was recorded in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income to recognize the effective portion of the fair value of any designated foreign currency hedge contracts that are, or previously were, designated as foreign currency cash flow hedges, as compared to a loss of $0.1 million, net of tax, for the three months ended June 28, 2014.
At June 27, 2015, gains of $1.2 million, net of tax, will be reclassified to earnings within the next twelve months. All currency cash flow hedges outstanding as of June 27, 2015 mature within twelve months.
Non-Designated Foreign Currency Contracts
We manage our exposure to changes in foreign currency on a consolidated basis to take advantage of offsetting transactions and balances. We use foreign currency forward contracts as a part of our strategy to manage exposure related to foreign currency denominated monetary assets and liabilities. These foreign currency forward contracts are entered into for periods consistent with currency transaction exposures, generally one month. They are not designated as cash flow or fair value hedges under ASC Topic 815. These forward contracts are marked-to-market with changes in fair value recorded to earnings. We had non-designated foreign currency hedge contracts under ASC Topic 815 outstanding in the contract amount of $38.0 million as of June 27, 2015 and $45.8 million as of March 28, 2015.
Interest Rate Swaps
On August 1, 2012, we entered into a credit agreement, as amended June 30, 2014, which provided for a term loan (“Credit Agreement”). Under the terms of this Credit Agreement, we may borrow at a spread to an index, including the LIBOR index of 1-month, 3-months, 6-months, etc. From the date of the Credit Agreement, we have chosen to borrow against the 1-month USD-LIBOR-BBA rounded up, if necessary, to the nearest 1/16th of 1% (“Adjusted LIBOR”). The terms of the Credit Agreement allows us to borrow in multiple tranches. As of June 27, 2015, we have four tranches outstanding.
Accordingly, our earnings and cash flows are exposed to interest rate risk from changes in Adjusted LIBOR. Part of our interest rate risk management strategy includes the use of interest rate swaps to mitigate our exposure to changes in variable interest rates. Our objective in using interest rate swaps is to add stability to interest expense and to manage and reduce the risk inherent in interest rate fluctuations. We formally document our hedge relationships (including identifying the hedged instrument and hedged item) at hedge inception to ensure that our interest rate swaps qualify for hedge accounting. On a quarterly basis, we assess whether the interest rate swaps are highly effective in offsetting changes in the cash flow of the hedged item. We do not hold or issue interest rate swaps for trading purposes. We manage the credit risk of the counterparties by dealing only with institutions that we consider financially sound and consider the risk of non-performance to be remote.
On December 21, 2012, we entered into two interest rate swap agreements (the "Swaps"), whereby we receive Adjusted LIBOR and pay an average fixed rate of 0.68% on a total notional amount of $250.0 million of debt. The Swaps mature on August 1, 2017. We designated the Swaps as cash flow hedges of variable interest rate risk associated with $250.0 million of indebtedness. For the three months ended June 27, 2015 and June 28, 2014, a nominal gain and a gain of $0.6 million, respectively, net of tax, were recorded in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income to recognize the effective portion of the fair value of interest rate swaps that qualify as cash flow hedges.
Fair Value of Derivative Instruments
The following table presents the effect of our derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges and those not designated as hedging instruments under ASC Topic 815 in our consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income for the three months ended June 27, 2015:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Derivative Instruments | | Amount of Gain/(Loss) Recognized in AOCI
| | Amount of Gain/(Loss) Reclassified from AOCI into Retained Earnings
| | Location in Consolidated Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income | | Amount of Gain/(Loss) Excluded from Effectiveness Testing * | | Location in Consolidated Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income |
(In thousands) | | | | | | | | | | |
Designated foreign currency hedge contracts, net of tax | | $ | 1,183 |
| | $ | 3,993 |
| | Net revenues, COGS, and SG&A | | $ | 16 |
| | Interest and other expense, net |
Non-designated foreign currency hedge contracts | | — |
| | — |
| | | | 621 |
| | Interest and other expense, net |
Designated interest rate swaps, net of tax | | $ | 7 |
| | $ | — |
| | Interest and other expense, net | | $ | — |
| | |
* We exclude the difference between the spot rate and hedge forward rate from our effectiveness testing.
We did not have fair value hedges or net investment hedges outstanding as of June 27, 2015 or March 28, 2015.
As of June 27, 2015, the amount recognized as a deferred tax liability for designated foreign currency hedges was $0.7 million and the amount recognized as a deferred tax asset for interest rate swap hedges was $0.1 million.
ASC Topic 815 requires all derivative instruments to be recognized at their fair value as either assets or liabilities on the balance sheet. We determine the fair value of our derivative instruments using the framework prescribed by ASC Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures, by considering the estimated amount we would receive or pay to sell or transfer these instruments at the reporting date and by taking into account current interest rates, currency exchange rates, current interest rate curves, interest rate volatilities, the creditworthiness of the counterparty for assets and our creditworthiness for liabilities. In certain instances, we may utilize financial models to measure fair value. Generally, we use inputs that include quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active; other observable inputs for the asset or liability; and inputs derived principally from, or corroborated by, observable market data by correlation or other means. As of June 27, 2015, we have classified our derivative assets and liabilities within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy prescribed by ASC 815, as discussed below, because these observable inputs are available for substantially the full term of our derivative instruments.
The following tables present the fair value of our derivative instruments as they appear in our consolidated balance sheets as of June 27, 2015 and March 28, 2015:
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
(In thousands) | | Location in Balance Sheet | | June 27, 2015 | | March 28, 2015 |
Derivative Assets: | | | | | | |
Designated foreign currency hedge contracts | | Other current assets | | $ | 5,647 |
| | $ | 9,740 |
|
| | | | $ | 5,647 |
| | $ | 9,740 |
|
Derivative Liabilities: | | | | | | |
Designated foreign currency hedge contracts | | Other current liabilities | | $ | 1,334 |
| | $ | 2,499 |
|
Designated interest rate swaps | | Other current liabilities | | 148 |
| | 159 |
|
| | | | $ | 1,482 |
| | $ | 2,658 |
|
Other Fair Value Measurements
ASC Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures, defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in accordance with U.S. GAAP, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. ASC Topic 820 does not require any new fair value measurements; rather, it applies to other accounting pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurements. In accordance with ASC Topic 820, for the three months ended June 27, 2015, we applied the requirements under ASC Topic 820 to our non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities. As we did not have an impairment of any non-financial assets or non-financial liabilities, there was no disclosure required relating to our non-financial assets or non-financial liabilities.
On a recurring basis, we measure certain financial assets and financial liabilities at fair value, including our money market funds, foreign currency hedge contracts, and contingent consideration. ASC Topic 820 defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. As such, fair value is a market-based measurement that should be determined based on assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability. We base fair value upon quoted market prices, where available. Where quoted market prices or other observable inputs are not available, we apply valuation techniques to estimate fair value.
ASC Topic 820 establishes a three-level valuation hierarchy for disclosure of fair value measurements. The categorization of assets and liabilities within the valuation hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the measurement of fair value. The three levels of the hierarchy are defined as follows:
| |
• | Level 1 — Inputs to the valuation methodology are quoted market prices for identical assets or liabilities. |
| |
• | Level 2 — Inputs to the valuation methodology are other observable inputs, including quoted market prices for similar assets or liabilities and market-corroborated inputs. |
| |
• | Level 3 — Inputs to the valuation methodology are unobservable inputs based on management’s best estimate of inputs market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability at the measurement date, including assumptions about risk. |
Our money market funds carried at fair value are classified within Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy because they are valued using quoted market prices.
Fair Value Measured on a Recurring Basis
Financial assets and financial liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis consist of the following as of June 27, 2015.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(In thousands) | | Quoted Market Prices for Identical Assets (Level 1) | | Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2) | | Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) | | Total |
Assets | | | | | | | | |
Money market funds | | $ | 71,099 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 71,099 |
|
Designated foreign currency hedge contracts | | — |
| | 5,647 |
| | — |
| | 5,647 |
|
| | $ | 71,099 |
| | $ | 5,647 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 76,746 |
|
Liabilities | | | | | | | | |
Designated foreign currency hedge contracts | | $ | — |
| | $ | 1,334 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 1,334 |
|
Designated interest rate swap | | — |
| | 148 |
| | — |
| | 148 |
|
Contingent consideration | | — |
| | — |
| | 4,810 |
| | 4,810 |
|
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 1,482 |
| | $ | 4,810 |
| | $ | 6,292 |
|
For the three months ended June 27, 2015, non-designated foreign currency hedge contracts were not significant and are not disclosed separately in the above table.
Contingent Consideration
Contingent consideration liabilities are measured at fair value using projected revenues, discount rates, probabilities of payment and projected payment dates. This Level 3 fair value measurement was performed using a probability-weighted discounted cash flow over a ten year period. Increases or decreases in the fair value of our contingent consideration liability can result from changes in discount periods and rates, as well as changes in the timing and amount of revenue estimates or likelihood of earning revenue. Projected revenues are based on our most recent internal operational budgets.
The table below provides a reconciliation of the beginning and ending Level 3 liabilities for the quarter ended June 27, 2015. |
| | | | |
(In thousands) | | Fair Value Measurements Using Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) |
Contingent consideration as of March 28, 2015 | | $ | 4,727 |
|
Fair value adjustment | | 83 |
|
Ending balance | | $ | 4,810 |
|
The fair value adjustment to contingent consideration was a result of updated assumptions pertaining to timing and unit volumes.
Other Fair Value Disclosures
The Term Loan (which is carried at amortized cost), accounts receivable and accounts payable approximate fair value.
8. INCOME TAXES
We conduct business globally, and as a result, report our results of operations in a number of foreign jurisdictions in addition to the United States.
The reported income tax rate for the three months ended June 27, 2015 was 116.7%, as compared to a reported income tax rate of 13.3% for the three months ended June 28, 2014.
During the three months ended June 27, 2015, we recorded pre-tax losses in Scotland, Italy and Malaysia due to restructuring and transformation costs associated with our manufacturing transformation, and we did not record a corresponding tax benefit due to uncertainty around our ability to realize a tax benefit in these jurisdictions. Similarly, during the three months ended June 28, 2014, we recorded pre-tax losses in Scotland associated with restructuring costs, and we did not record a corresponding tax benefit due to uncertainty around our ability to realize a tax benefit in this jurisdiction.
We also recorded tax expense of $1.0 million for the three months ended June 27, 2015 to increase the deferred tax liability related to amortizable goodwill as a result of the statutory capital gains tax rate in Puerto Rico increasing from 15% to 20%.
We are in a three year cumulative loss position in the U.S. and accordingly have established a valuation allowance against U.S. deferred tax assets.
9. DEBT
In connection with the acquisition of the whole blood business, we entered into a credit agreement ("Credit Agreement") with certain lenders (together, “Lenders”) which provided for a $475.0 million Term Loan and a $50.0 million revolving loan (the “Revolving Credit Facility”), and together with the Term Loan, (the “Credit Facilities”). The Credit Facilities had a term of five years and mature on August 1, 2017. Interest was based on the Adjusted LIBOR plus a range of 1.125% to 1.500% depending on the achievement of leverage ratios and customary credit terms which included financial and negative covenants.
On June 30, 2014, we modified our existing Credit Facilities by extending the maturity date to July 1, 2019, extending the principal repayments of the Term Loan, and modifying certain restrictive covenants to allow greater operational flexibility and enhanced near term liquidity. In addition, the amended Credit Agreement provides for a $100.0 million revolving credit facility and establishes interest rates in the range of LIBOR plus 1.125% – 1.500%, depending on certain conditions. At June 27, 2015, $379.4 million was outstanding under the term loan and $50.0 million was outstanding on the Revolving Credit Facility, both with an interest rate of 1.5625%. No additional amounts were borrowed as a result of this modification. The fair value of debt approximates its current value of approximately $429.4 million as of June 27, 2015. We were in compliance with the leverage and interest coverage ratios specified in the Credit Agreement as well as all other bank covenants as of June 27, 2015.
The maturity profile is as follows:
|
| | | | |
Fiscal year (in thousands) | | Term Loan |
2016 | | $ | 21,342 |
|
2017 | | 42,683 |
|
2018 | | 45,054 |
|
2019 | | 151,763 |
|
2020 | | 168,564 |
|
| | $ | 429,406 |
|
10. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
We are presently engaged in various legal actions, and although the total liability cannot be determined at the present time, based on consultation with counsel, we believe that any such liability will not materially affect our consolidated financial position or our results of operations.
Italian Employment Litigation
Our Italian manufacturing subsidiary is party to several actions initiated by employees of the facility in Ascoli-Piceno, Italy where we have ceased manufacturing operations. These include actions claiming (i) working conditions and minimum salaries should have been established by either a different classification under their national collective bargaining agreement or a different agreement altogether, (ii) certain solidarity agreements, which are arrangements between the Company, employees and the government to continue full pay and benefits for employees who would otherwise be terminated in times of low demand, are void, and (iii) payment of the extra time used for changing into and out of the working clothes at the beginning and end of each shift.
In addition, a union represented in the Ascoli plant has filed an action claiming that the Company discriminated against it in favor of three other represented unions by (i) interfering with an employee referendum, (ii) interfering with an employee petition to recall union representatives from office, and (iii) excluding the union from certain meetings.
Finally, we have been added as defendants on claims filed against Pall Corporation prior to our acquisition of the plant in August 2012. These claims relate to agreements to "freeze" benefit allowances for a certain period in exchange for Pall's commitments on hiring and plant investment.
As of June 27, 2015, the total amount of damages claimed by the plaintiffs in these matters is approximately $3.7 million. It is not possible at this point in the proceedings to accurately evaluate the likelihood or amount of any potential losses and therefore no amounts have been accrued. We may receive other, similar claims in the future.
11. SEGMENT INFORMATION
We manage a global business which designs, manufactures and markets blood management solutions. Our solutions are marketed through operating units organized primarily on geography: North America Plasma, North America Blood Center and Hospital, Europe, Asia Pacific and Japan.
ASC 280, Segment Reporting, permits the aggregation of segments which are economically similar as well as similar in all of the following areas: (i) the nature of the products and services, (ii) the nature of the production processes, (iii) the type or class of customer for their products and services, (iv) the methods used to distribute their products or provide their services, and (v) the nature of the regulatory environment.
Based on the criteria of ASC 280, we have one reportable segment. This conclusion is consistent with how our chief operating decision-maker views the business. Our chief operating decision maker primarily uses consolidated results to make operating and strategic decisions.
12. RESTRUCTURING
On an ongoing basis, we review the global economy, the healthcare industry and the markets in which we compete to identify opportunities for efficiencies, enhance commercial capabilities, align our resources and offer our customers better solutions. In order to realize these opportunities, we undertake restructuring-type activities to transform our business.
On May 1, 2013, we committed to a plan to pursue identified Value Creation and Capture initiatives ("VCC"). These opportunities include investment in product line extensions and next generation products, enhancement of commercial capabilities and a transformation of our manufacturing network. The transformation of our manufacturing network will take place over three years and includes changes to the current manufacturing footprint and supply chain structure (the "Network Plan"). To implement the Network Plan, we are (i) discontinuing manufacturing activities at our Braintree, Massachusetts, Ascoli-Piceno, Italy and Bothwell, Scotland facilities, (ii) creating a technology center of excellence for product development in Braintree, Massachusetts, (iii) expanding our current facility in Tijuana, Mexico, (iv) engaging Sanmina Corporation as a contract manufacturer to produce certain medical equipment, and (v) building a new manufacturing facility in Penang, Malaysia closer to our customers in Asia. See the Liquidity and Capital Resources discussion of the MD&A for further discussion of the costs of these activities.
We estimate we will incur approximately $45.0 million in restructuring and restructuring related expense in 2016.
The following summarizes the restructuring costs for the three months ended June 27, 2015 and June 28, 2014:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended June 27, 2015 |
(In thousands) | | Restructuring Accrual Balance at March 28, 2015 | | Restructuring Costs Incurred | | Less Payments | | Less Non-Cash Adjustments | | Restructuring Accrual Balance at June 27, 2015 |
Severance and other employee costs | | $ | 16,393 |
| | $ | 6,859 |
| | $ | (8,155 | ) | | $ | — |
| | $ | 15,097 |
|
Other costs | | 219 |
| | 2,175 |
| | (2,266 | ) | | — |
| | 128 |
|
Accelerated depreciation | | — |
| | 421 |
| | — |
| | (421 | ) | | — |
|
Asset write-down | | — |
| | 4 |
| | — |
| | (4 | ) | | — |
|
Total | | $ | 16,612 |
| | $ | 9,459 |
| | $ | (10,421 | ) | | $ | (425 | ) | | $ | 15,225 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended June 28, 2014 |
(in thousands) | | Restructuring Accrual Balance at March 29, 2014 | | Restructuring Costs Incurred | | Less Payments | | Less Non-Cash Adjustments | | Restructuring Accrual Balance at June 28, 2014 |
Severance and other employee costs | | $ | 22,908 |
| | $ | 9,542 |
| | $ | (7,133 | ) | | $ | — |
| | $ | 25,317 |
|
Other costs | | 728 |
| | 5,167 |
| | (5,493 | ) | | — |
| | 402 |
|
Accelerated depreciation | | — |
| | 260 |
| | — |
| | (260 | ) | | — |
|
Asset write-down | | — |
| | 96 |
| | — |
| | (96 | ) | | — |
|
| | $ | 23,636 |
| | $ | 15,065 |
| | $ | (12,626 | ) | | $ | (356 | ) | | $ | 25,719 |
|
We deployed significant financial resources for these activities. Many of the costs necessary to complete the VCC initiatives, such as severance and other plant closing costs, qualify as restructuring expenses under ASC 420, Exit or Disposal Cost Obligations. We incurred $9.5 million in severance, asset write-downs and other restructuring charges during the three months ended June 27, 2015. In addition, we also incurred $5.4 million of costs that do not constitute restructuring under ASC 420, which we refer to as "Transformation Costs". These costs consist primarily of expenditures directly related to our transformation activities including program management, product line transfer teams and related costs, infrastructure related costs, accelerated depreciation and asset disposals.
The table below presents transformation and restructuring costs recorded in cost of goods sold, research and development, selling, general and administrative expenses and interest and other expense in our Consolidated Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income for the periods presented.
|
| | | | | | | | |
Transformation costs | | Three Months Ended |
(in thousands) | | June 27, 2015 | | June 28, 2014 |
Transformation and other costs | | $ | 5,326 |
| | $ | 7,678 |
|
Accelerated depreciation | | 31 |
| | 250 |
|
Total | | $ | 5,357 |
| | $ | 7,928 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | |
Restructuring costs | | Three Months Ended |
(in thousands) | | June 27, 2015 | | June 28, 2014 |
Severance and other employee costs | | $ | 6,859 |
| | $ | 9,542 |
|
Other costs | | 2,175 |
| | 5,167 |
|
Accelerated depreciation | | 421 |
| | 260 |
|
Asset disposal | | 4 |
| | 96 |
|
Total | | $ | 9,459 |
| | $ | 15,065 |
|
| | | | |
Total restructuring and transformation | | $ | 14,816 |
| | $ | 22,993 |
|
13. CAPITALIZATION OF SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT COSTS
For costs incurred related to the development of software to be sold, leased or otherwise marketed, we apply the provisions of ASC 985-20, Software - Costs of Software to be Sold, Leased or Marketed, which specifies that costs incurred internally in researching and developing a computer software product should be charged to expense until technological feasibility has been established for the product. Once technological feasibility is established, all software costs should be capitalized until the product is available for general release to customers.
We capitalized $3.9 million and $1.4 million in software development costs for ongoing initiatives during the three months ended June 27, 2015 and June 28, 2014, respectively. At June 27, 2015 and March 28, 2015, we have a total of $43.6 million and $39.7 million of capitalized software costs, of which $5.9 million and $7.9 million are related to in-process software development initiatives, respectively. During the three months ended June 27, 2015, $5.8 million of capitalized costs were placed into service. The costs capitalized for each project are included in intangible assets in the consolidated financial statements. We review these assets for impairment at least annually.
14. ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
The following is a roll-forward of the components of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income, net of tax, for the three months ended June 27, 2015:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(In thousands) | | Foreign Currency | | Defined Benefit Plans | | Net Unrealized (Gain)/Loss on Derivatives | | Total |
| | | | | | | | |
Balance as of March 28, 2015 | | $ | (20,512 | ) | | $ | (8,923 | ) | | $ | 7,711 |
| | $ | (21,724 | ) |
Other comprehensive income (loss)/income before reclassifications | | 441 |
| | 2 |
| | 1,190 |
| | 1,633 |
|
Amounts reclassified from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income | | — |
| | — |
| | (3,993 | ) | | (3,993 | ) |
Net current period other comprehensive (loss)/income | | 441 |
| | 2 |
| | (2,803 | ) | | (2,360 | ) |
Balance as of June 27, 2015 | | $ | (20,071 | ) | | $ | (8,921 | ) | | $ | 4,908 |
| | $ | (24,084 | ) |
Details pertaining to the amount reclassified from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income for the three months ended June 27, 2015 are as follows:
|
| | | | | | |
| | Amounts Reclassified from Other Comprehensive Income | | Affected Line in the Statement of Income |
Derivative instruments reclassified to income statement | | | | |
Realized net gain on derivatives | | $ | 4,152 |
| | Revenue, cost of goods sold, income/(expense) |
Income tax effect | | (159 | ) | | Provision for income taxes |
Net of taxes | | $ | 3,993 |
| | |
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
This Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (“MD&A”) should be read in conjunction with both our interim consolidated financial statements and notes thereto which appear elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and our annual consolidated financial statements, notes thereto and the MD&A contained in our fiscal year 2015 Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) on May 22, 2015. The following discussion may contain forward-looking statements and should be read in conjunction with the “Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Information.”
Our Business
Haemonetics is a global healthcare company dedicated to providing innovative blood management solutions to our customers. Our comprehensive portfolio of integrated devices, information management, and consulting services offers blood management solutions for each facet of the blood supply chain, helping improve clinical outcomes and reduce costs for blood and plasma collectors, hospitals, and patients around the world. Our products and services help prevent a transfusion to a patient who does not need one and provide the right blood product, at the right time, in the right dose to the patient who does.
Blood and its components (plasma, platelets, and red cells) have many vital and frequently life-saving clinical applications. Plasma is used for patients with major blood loss and is manufactured into pharmaceuticals to treat a variety of illnesses and hereditary disorders such as hemophilia. Red cells treat trauma patients or patients undergoing surgery with high blood loss, such as open heart surgery or organ transplant. Platelets treat cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy. Blood is essential to a modern healthcare system.
Products
Our medical device systems provide both automated and manual collection and processing of donated blood, assess likelihood for blood loss, salvage and process blood from surgery patients, and dispense and track blood inventory in the hospital. These systems include devices and single-use, proprietary disposable sets (“disposables”) some of which only operate with our specialized devices. Specifically, our plasma and blood center systems allow users to collect and process only the blood component(s) they target - plasma, platelets, or red blood cells - increasing donor and patient safety as well as collection efficiencies. Our blood diagnostics system assesses hemostasis (a patient's clotting ability) to aid clinicians in assessing the cause of bleeding, resulting in overall reductions in blood product usage. Our surgical blood salvage systems allow surgeons to collect the blood lost by a patient in surgery, cleanse the blood, and make it available for transfusion back to the patient. Our blood tracking systems automate the distribution of blood products in the hospital. Our manual blood collection and filtration systems enable the manual collection of all blood components while detecting bacteria, thus reducing the risks of infection through transfusion.
We place devices with some of our customers which remain our property. The customer has the right to use these devices for a period of time as long as certain conditions are met, which, among other things, generally include one or more of the following:
| |
• | Purchase and consumption of a minimum level of disposables products; |
| |
• | Payment of monthly rental fees; and |
| |
• | An asset utilization performance metric, such as performing a minimum level of procedures per month per device. |
Recent Developments
Russian Economic Conditions
Economic weakness in Russia has impacted our financial results in the first quarter of fiscal 2016. We expect that our Russian business performance will improve in the second half of fiscal 2016, and full year performance will be similar to fiscal 2015. While the needs for our products in the Russian marketplace continue, the challenging macro-economic conditions in Russia have resulted in reduced government healthcare spending and, as a result, our distributors are placing fewer orders and managing their inventory levels. In the first quarter of fiscal 2016 and 2015, Russia accounted for 1% and 3% of revenue, respectively. We continue to work closely with our Russian distributors to monitor market conditions and manage credit risk.
Declines in U.S. Blood Center Collections
Sales to U.S. blood centers of our whole blood disposables represent approximately 6% of our total revenue. The demand for these disposable products in the U.S. declined in fiscal 2015 due to a rapid decline in demand for blood products associated with actions taken by hospitals to improve blood management techniques and protocols. We believe the decline in U.S. blood center collections of approximately 10% in fiscal 2015 will moderate in fiscal 2016. While it will continue to negatively impact red cell and whole blood revenue, the magnitude of the negative impact will be reduced.
In response to this trend, certain large U.S. blood center collection groups pursued single source vendors for whole blood collection products which required significant reductions in average selling prices in order to retain or increase our share of their business. During fiscal 2014 we entered into a multi-year agreement to supply the HemeXcel Purchasing Alliance, LLC with certain whole blood collection components during the calendar years 2014-2016. The agreement included a reduction in average selling prices which negatively impacted our financial results in the first quarter of fiscal 2016. In March 2014, the American Red Cross selected another exclusive supplier to provide certain whole blood products. This reduced annualized revenues by approximately $25.0 million beginning in the second quarter of fiscal 2015.
Additionally, U.S. blood collection groups are pursuing arrangements for apheresis red cell collections similar to the single source agreements pursued in whole blood. We are seeing increasing competition for this business which will likely affect future red cell market share and pricing; this will negatively affect future red cell revenues and gross margins.
Value Creation and Capture Initiatives
On May 1, 2013, we committed to a plan to pursue identified Value Creation and Capture initiatives ("VCC"). These opportunities include investment in product line extensions and next generation products, enhancement of commercial capabilities and a transformation of our manufacturing network. The transformation of our manufacturing network will take place over three years and includes changes to the current manufacturing footprint and supply chain structure (the "Network Plan"). To implement the Network Plan, we are (i) discontinuing manufacturing activities at our Braintree, Massachusetts, Ascoli-Piceno, Italy and Bothwell, Scotland facilities, (ii) creating a technology center of excellence for product development in Braintree, Massachusetts, (iii) expanding our current facility in Tijuana, Mexico, (iv) engaging Sanmina Corporation as a contract manufacturer to produce certain medical equipment, and (v) building a new manufacturing facility in Penang, Malaysia closer to our customers in Asia. See the Liquidity and Capital Resources discussion for further discussion of the costs of these activities.
Our VCC initiatives are moving forward according to plan. We have engaged Sanmina Corporation to be the sole manufacturer of certain equipment, and we have commenced production in our new manufacturing facility in Penang, Malaysia and in our expanded facility in Tijuana, Mexico allowing us to consolidate the manufacturing of product formerly produced in the U.S., Italy and Scotland.
TEG 6s Receives Final U.S. 510(k) Clearance
During the first quarter of fiscal 2016, we received final U.S. 510(k) clearance on our next generation diagnostics device, the TEG 6s, and single-use disposable cartridges for use in cardiovascular and cardiology procedures. The U.S. commercial launch is currently commencing and sales have been realized in Europe, Australia, and Japan in the first quarter of fiscal 2016.
Financial Summary
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended |
(In thousands, except per share data) | | June 27, 2015 | | June 28, 2014 | | % Increase/ (Decrease) |
Net revenues | | $ | 213,413 |
| | $ | 224,488 |
| | (4.9 | )% |
Gross profit | | $ | 102,539 |
| | $ | 106,278 |
| | (3.5 | )% |
% of net revenues | | 48.0 | % | | 47.3 | % | | |
Operating expenses | | $ | 98,933 |
| | $ | 107,944 |
| | (8.3 | )% |
Operating income (loss) | | $ | 3,606 |
| | $ | (1,666 | ) | | n/m |
|
% of net revenues | | 1.7 | % | | (0.7 | )% | | |
Interest and other expense, net | | $ | (2,009 | ) | | $ | (2,543 | ) | | (21.0 | )% |
Income (loss) before provision for (benefit from) income taxes | | $ | 1,597 |
| | $ | (4,209 | ) | | n/m |
|
Provision for (benefit from) income taxes | | $ | 1,864 |
| | $ | (560 | ) | | n/m |
|
% of pre-tax income | | 116.7 | % | | 13.3 | % | | |
Net loss | | $ | (267 | ) | | $ | (3,649 | ) | | (92.7 | )% |
% of net revenues | | (0.1 | )% | | (1.6 | )% | | |
Earnings per share-diluted | | $ | (0.01 | ) | | $ | (0.07 | ) | | (85.7 | )% |
Net revenues decreased 4.9% for the three months ended June 27, 2015, as compared to the same period of fiscal 2015. Without the effect of foreign exchange, net revenues decreased 1.9% for the three months ended June 27, 2015, as compared to the same period of fiscal 2015. Revenue increases in plasma and TEG disposables were more than offset by declines in Russia due to market conditions and our reduced share of the North American whole blood market for the three months ended June 27, 2015.
We recorded operating income during the three months ended June 27, 2015, as compared to an operating loss in the same period of fiscal 2015. Operating income increased for the three months ended June 27, 2015 due primarily to the reduction of restructuring and transformation expenses of $8.0 million as compared to the first quarter of fiscal 2015. In addition, higher gross profit was partially offset by increased sales and marketing activities related to Asia Pacific, and our plasma and TEG businesses.
Net loss decreased 92.7% for the three months ended June 27, 2015, as compared to the same period of fiscal 2015. Without the effect of foreign exchange, we reported net income for the three months ended June 27, 2015, as compared to a net loss in the same period of fiscal 2015. The change in net loss is attributable to the increase in operating income described above, offset by an increase in the income tax provision.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Net Revenue by Geography
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended |
(In thousands) | | June 27, 2015 | | June 28, 2014 | | % Increase/ (Decrease) |
United States | | $ | 120,695 |
| | $ | 120,749 |
| | — | % |
International | | 92,718 |
| | 103,739 |
| | (10.6 | )% |
Net revenue | | $ | 213,413 |
| | $ | 224,488 |
| | (4.9 | )% |
Our principal operations are in the U.S., Europe, Japan and other parts of Asia. Our products are marketed in approximately 100 countries around the world through a combination of our direct sales force, independent distributors and agents. Our revenue generated outside the U.S. approximated 43.4% of total net revenue for the three months ended June 27, 2015. International sales are generally conducted in local currencies, primarily Japanese Yen, Euro, Chinese Yuan and Australian Dollars. Our revenue was impacted by changes in the value of these currencies relative to the U.S. Dollar.
We have placed foreign currency hedges to mitigate our exposure to foreign currency fluctuations. Relative weakness in the Japanese Yen and Euro to the U.S. Dollar has negatively impacted revenue and operating income in the first quarter of fiscal 2016. We expect this trend to continue through the remainder of fiscal 2016 and into fiscal 2017. International revenue was also negatively impacted by reduced sales to our Russian distributors in the first quarter of fiscal 2016.
Please see the section entitled “Foreign Exchange” in this discussion for a more complete explanation of how foreign currency affects our business and our strategy for managing this exposure.
Net revenue by Product Type
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended |
(In thousands) | | June 27, 2015 | | June 28, 2014 | | % Increase/ (Decrease) |
Disposables | | $ | 185,730 |
| | $ | 196,193 |
| | (5.3 | )% |
Software solutions | | 16,839 |
| | 17,738 |
| | (5.1 | )% |
Equipment & other | | 10,844 |
| | 10,557 |
| | 2.7 | % |
Net revenue | | $ | 213,413 |
| | $ | 224,488 |
| | (4.9 | )% |
Disposables Revenue
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended |
(In thousands) | | June 27, 2015 | | June 28, 2014 | | % Increase/ (Decrease) |
Plasma disposables | | $ | 80,966 |
| | $ | 79,227 |
| | 2.2 | % |
Blood center disposables | | | | | | |
Platelet | | 31,029 |
| | 38,170 |
| | (18.7 | )% |
Red cell | | 10,652 |
| | 10,246 |
| | 4.0 | % |
Whole blood | | 32,424 |
| | 37,950 |
| | (14.6 | )% |
| | 74,105 |
| | 86,366 |
| | (14.2 | )% |
Hospital disposables | | | | | | |
Diagnostics | | 11,761 |
| | 9,598 |
| | 22.5 | % |
Surgical | | 14,917 |
| | 15,621 |
| | (4.5 | )% |
OrthoPAT | | 3,981 |
| | 5,381 |
| | (26.0 | )% |
| | 30,659 |
| | 30,600 |
| | 0.2 | % |
Total disposables revenue | | $ | 185,730 |
| | $ | 196,193 |
| | (5.3 | )% |
Our disposables revenue stream includes the sales of single-use disposables, which accounted for 87.0% and 87.4% of our total revenue for the three months ended June 27, 2015 and June 28, 2014, respectively.
Disposables revenue decreased 5.3% for the three months ended June 27, 2015, as compared to the same period of fiscal 2015. Without the effect of foreign exchange, disposables revenue decreased 2.4% for the three months ended June 27, 2015, as compared to the same period of fiscal 2015. The decrease was primarily driven by market conditions in Russia which reduced platelet and plasma sales and our reduced share of the North American whole blood market. The decrease was partially offset by growth in U.S. plasma and TEG disposables revenue.
Plasma Disposables
Plasma disposables revenue increased 2.2% for the three months ended June 27, 2015, as compared to the same period of fiscal 2015. Without the effect of foreign exchange, plasma revenue increased 4.6% for the three months ended June 27, 2015, as compared to the same period of fiscal 2015. Plasma revenue increased due to higher volumes in the U.S. associated with end market growth for plasma-derived biopharmaceuticals. This growth was partially offset by order timing in the prior year and market conditions in Russia.
Blood Center Disposables
Platelet
We continue to see significant differences in demand for our platelet products in various markets depending on access to health care and adoption of certain efficient collection techniques. In emerging markets, increased access to health care continues to increase the demand for platelet transfusions, while increases in the demand for platelet transfusions in developed markets is modest. Collection efficiencies which increase the yield of platelets per collection and more efficient use of collected platelets reduce the number of collections required to meet market demand. Where we see adoption of these techniques we experience reduced demand for our products, however, not all markets have adopted these collection efficiencies at the same level. Japan recently began adoption of these techniques which will impact revenue from platelet collection disposables.
Platelet disposables revenue decreased 18.7% for the three months ended June 27, 2015, as compared to the same period of fiscal 2015. Without the effect of foreign exchange, platelet disposable revenue decreased 13.0% for the three months ended June 27, 2015, as compared to the same period of fiscal 2015. The decrease in platelet disposable revenue was the result of lower sales in Russia and Japan, due to our largest Russian distributor reducing their inventory on hand and order patterns in Japan.
Red Cell and Whole Blood
Red cell disposables revenue increased 4.0% for the three months ended June 27, 2015, as compared to the same period of fiscal 2015. Without the effect of foreign exchange, red cell disposables revenue increased 5.1% for the three months ended June 27, 2015, as compared to the same period of fiscal 2015. The increase during the three months ended June 27, 2015 was driven by U.S. red cell customers utilizing collection practices that favor automated red cell collection. However, U.S, blood collection groups are pursuing arrangements for apheresis red cell collections similar to the single source agreements pursued in whole blood. We are seeing increasing competition for this business which will likely affect future red cell market share and pricing; this will negatively affect future red cell revenues and gross margins.
Whole blood disposables revenue decreased 14.6% for the three months ended June 27, 2015, as compared to the same period of fiscal 2015. Without the effect of foreign exchange, whole blood revenue decreased 12.6% for the three months ended June 27, 2015, as compared to the same period of fiscal 2015. Revenue for the three months ended June 27, 2015 decreased primarily due to the loss of the American Red Cross business. The anniversary of this loss occurred at the end of the first quarter of fiscal 2016. We expect that the recent rates of decline in U.S. whole blood transfusion rates will moderate in fiscal 2016. The decrease in whole blood disposables revenue was partially offset by growth from the Middle East which is largely related to the timing of orders as a result of conversions to a whole blood collection product that enables increased platelet recovery.
Hospital Disposables
Diagnostics
Diagnostics product revenue consists principally of the consumable reagents used with the TEG analyzer. Revenue from our diagnostics products increased 22.5% for the three months ended June 27, 2015, as compared to the same period of fiscal 2015. Without the effect of foreign exchange, diagnostics product revenues increased 19.5% for the three months ended June 27, 2015, as compared to the same period of fiscal 2015. The revenue increase is due to continued adoption of our TEG analyzer, principally in the U.S. and China. We are expecting our growth rate to increase with the launch of the TEG 6s device and disposables which received final U.S. 510(k) clearance in the first quarter of fiscal 2016.
Surgical
Surgical disposables revenue consists principally of the Cell Saver and CardioPAT products. Revenues from our surgical disposables decreased 4.5% for the three months ended June 27, 2015, as compared to the same period of fiscal 2015. Without the effect of foreign exchange, surgical disposables revenue increased 0.3% for the three months ended June 27, 2015, as compared to the same period of fiscal 2015. For the three months ended June 27, 2015, without the effect of foreign exchange, surgical disposables revenue was flat, as strength in emerging markets was offset by declines in developed markets.
OrthoPAT
Revenues from our OrthoPAT disposables decreased 26.0% for the three months ended June 27, 2015, as compared to the same period of fiscal 2015. Without the effect of foreign exchange, OrthoPAT disposables revenue decreased 21.3% for the three months ended June 27, 2015, as compared to the same period of fiscal 2015. Better blood management has reduced orthopedic blood loss and demand for OrthoPAT disposables. Recent trends in blood management, particularly the adoption of tranexamic acid to treat and prevent orthopedic post-operative blood loss, have lessened hospital use of OrthoPAT disposables.
Software Solutions Revenue
Our software solutions revenues include sales of our information technology software platforms and consulting services. Software revenues decreased 5.1% for the three months ended June 27, 2015, as compared to the same period of fiscal 2015. Without the effect of foreign exchange, software revenues decreased 1.7% for the three months ended June 27, 2015, as compared to the same period of fiscal 2015. Software revenue decreased during the three months ended June 27, 2015 primarily due to reductions in implementations during the quarter as we develop the pipeline for the new BloodTrack product. Lower revenue associated with our other software products is due to fewer implementations in the quarter. This decrease was partially offset by an 11% increase in plasma software revenue.
Equipment & Other Revenue
Our equipment and other revenues include revenue from equipment sales, repairs performed under preventive maintenance contracts or emergency service visits, spare part sales, and various services and training programs. These revenues are primarily composed of equipment sales, which tend to vary from period to period more than our disposable business due to the timing of order patterns, particularly in our distribution markets. Equipment and other revenues increased 2.7% for the three months ended June 27, 2015, as compared to the same period of fiscal 2015. Without the effect of foreign exchange, equipment and other revenues increased 7.6% for the three months ended June 27, 2015, respectively, as compared to the same period of fiscal 2015. The increase in revenue during the three months ended June 27, 2015 was primarily due to growth in the U.S. and Asia, offset by decreases in Latin American equipment sales and market conditions in Russia discouraging capital spending.
Gross Profit |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended |
(In thousands) | | June 27, 2015 | | June 28, 2014 | | % Increase/ (Decrease) |
Gross profit | | $ | 102,539 |
| | $ | 106,278 |
| | (3.5 | )% |
% of net revenues | | 48.0 | % | | 47.3 | % | | |
|
Gross profit decreased 3.5% for the three months ended June 27, 2015, as compared to the same period of fiscal 2015. Without the effect of foreign exchange, gross profit increased 0.1% for the three months ended June 27, 2015, as compared to the same period of fiscal 2015. The gross profit margin increased by 70 basis points for the three months ended June 27, 2015, as compared to the same period of fiscal 2015. The increase in gross profit margin during the three months ended June 27, 2015 was primarily due to cost savings from productivity programs, including the VCC initiatives. The increase was partially offset by product mix.
Operating Expenses
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended |
(In thousands) | | June 27, 2015 | | June 28, 2014 | | % Increase/ (Decrease) |
Research and development | | $ | 11,321 |
| | $ | 15,382 |
| | (26.4 | )% |
% of net revenues | | 5.3 | % | | 6.9 | % | | |
|
Selling, general and administrative | | $ | 87,612 |
| | $ | 92,562 |
| | (5.3 | )% |
% of net revenues | | 41.1 | % | | 41.2 | % | | |
|
Total operating expenses | | $ | 98,933 |
| | $ | 107,944 |
| | (8.3 | )% |
% of net revenues | | 46.4 | % | | 48.1 | % | | |
|
Research and Development
Research and development expenses decreased 26.4% for the three months ended June 27, 2015, as compared to the same period of fiscal 2015. Without the effect of foreign exchange, research and development expenses decreased 24.5% for the three months ended June 27, 2015, as compared to the same period of fiscal 2015. The decrease for three months ended June 27, 2015 was due to a reduction in restructuring and transformation costs of $3.2 million and increased capitalized internally developed software of $2.4 million, as compared to the first quarter of fiscal 2015. Including the capitalized internally developed software, actual research and development activities have increased to support our long-term product plans and increase our competitiveness.
Selling, General and Administrative
Selling, general and administrative expenses decreased 5.3% for the three months ended June 27, 2015, as compared to the same period of fiscal 2015. Without the effect of foreign exchange, selling, general, and administrative expenses decreased 1.5% for the three months ended June 27, 2015, as compared to the same period of fiscal 2015. The decrease for the three months ended June 27, 2015 was primarily due to the reduction in restructuring and transformation costs of $3.4 million, as compared to the same period of fiscal 2015. These reductions in restructuring and transformation costs were a result of the timing of manufacturing network optimization activities. The decrease in fiscal 2016 was partially offset by increased spending in sales and marketing activities related to Asia Pacific, and our plasma and TEG businesses.
Interest and Other Expense, Net
Interest and other expense, net decreased 21.0% for the three months ended June 27, 2015, as compared to the same period of fiscal 2015. Interest expense from our term loan borrowings constitutes the majority of expense reported in both periods. The effective interest rate on total debt outstanding for the three months ended June 27, 2015 was approximately 2.0%.
Income Taxes
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended |
| | June 27, 2015 | | June 28, 2014 | | % Increase/ (Decrease) |
Reported income tax rate | | 116.7 | % | | 13.3 | % | | 103.4 | % |
We conduct business globally, and as a result, report our results of operations in a number of foreign jurisdictions in addition to the United States.
The reported income tax rate for the three months ended June 27, 2015 was 116.7%, as compared to a reported income tax rate of 13.3% for the three months ended June 28, 2014. During the three months ended June 27, 2015, we recorded pre-tax losses in Scotland, Italy and Malaysia due to restructuring and transformation costs associated with our manufacturing transformation, and we did not record a corresponding tax benefit due to uncertainty around our ability to realize a tax benefit in these jurisdictions. Similarly, during the three months ended June 28, 2014, we recorded pre-tax losses in Scotland associated with restructuring costs, and we did not record a corresponding tax benefit due to uncertainty around our ability to realize a tax benefit in this jurisdiction. We also recorded tax expense of $1.0 million for the three months ended June 27, 2015 to increase the deferred tax liability related to amortizable goodwill as a result of the statutory capital gains tax rate in Puerto Rico increasing from 15% to 20%. We are in a three year cumulative loss position in the U.S. and accordingly have established a valuation allowance against U.S. deferred tax assets.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
The following table contains certain key performance indicators we believe depict our liquidity and cash flow position:
|
| | | | | | | | |
(Dollars in thousands) | | June 27, 2015 | | March 28, 2015 |
Cash & cash equivalents | | $ | 112,204 |
| | $ | 160,662 |
|
Working capital | | $ | 338,596 |
| | $ | 381,185 |
|
Current ratio | | 3.0 |
| | 3.0 |
|
Net debt (1) | | $ | (319,645 | ) | | $ | (267,229 | ) |
Days sales outstanding (DSO) | | 59 |
| | 58 |
|
Disposable finished goods inventory turnover | | 4.1 |
| | 4.3 |
|
| |
(1) | Net debt position is the sum of cash and cash equivalents less total debt. |
As previously discussed, during fiscal 2015 our business was negatively impacted by reductions in the demand for blood products caused by changes in blood management practices and actions taken by U.S. blood center customers in response to reductions in demand. This includes the loss of the American Red Cross whole blood contract which impacted our results beginning in the first quarter of fiscal 2015. We believe the decline in U.S. blood center collections will moderate in fiscal 2016.
Our VCC initiatives require cash expenditures for plant exit and closure costs; including separation benefits, new plant construction and temporary increases in inventory levels as manufacturing is transitioned to new facilities. We estimate we will incur approximately $45.0 million in restructuring and restructuring related expense in fiscal 2016.
On April 28, 2014, we announced a share repurchase plan of up to $100.0 million worth of shares in the open market. The repurchase program adheres to all debt covenants and is subject to market conditions. During the three months ended June 27, 2015 we repurchased approximately 1.0 million shares at a total cost of $40.9 million, of which $39.0 million was paid and $1.9 million, related to an unsettled portion of the repurchase, remained payable as of June 27, 2015. As of June 27, 2015, we have repurchased a total of approximately 2.2 million shares at a total cost of $79.9 million under this plan. We intend to complete this plan with an additional $20.1 million of share repurchases in fiscal 2016.
Debt
In connection with the acquisition of the whole blood business, we entered into a credit agreement ("Credit Agreement") with certain lenders (together, “Lenders”) which provided for a $475.0 million Term Loan and a $50.0 million revolving loan (the “Revolving Credit Facility”), and together with the Term Loan, (the “Credit Facilities”). The Credit Facilities had a term of five years and mature on August 1, 2017. Interest was based on the Adjusted LIBOR plus a range of 1.125% to 1.500% depending on achievement of leverage ratios and customary credit terms which included financial and negative covenants.
On June 30, 2014, we modified our existing Credit Facilities by extending the maturity date to July 1, 2019, extending the principal repayments of the Term Loan, and modifying certain restrictive covenants to allow greater operational flexibility and enhanced near term liquidity. In addition, the amended Credit Agreement provides for a $100.0 million revolving credit facility and establishes interest rates in the range of LIBOR plus 1.125% – 1.500%, depending on certain conditions. No additional amounts were borrowed as a result of this modification. The fair value of debt approximates its current value of approximately $429.4 million as of June 27, 2015. We were in compliance with the leverage and interest coverage ratios specified in the Credit Agreement as well as all other bank covenants as of June 27, 2015.
Cash Flows
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended |
(In thousands) | | June 27, 2015 | | June 28, 2014 | | Increase/ (Decrease) |
Net cash provided by (used in): | | | | | | |
Operating activities | | $ | 9,250 |
| | $ | 13,738 |
| | $ | (4,488 | ) |
Investing activities | | (27,130 | ) | | (37,021 | ) | | (9,891 | ) |
Financing activities | | (29,772 | ) | | (28,811 | ) | | 961 |
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents (1) | | (806 | ) | | (432 | ) | | (374 | ) |
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents | | $ | (48,458 | ) | | $ | (52,526 | ) | | |
| |
(1) | The balance sheet is affected by spot exchange rates used to translate local currency amounts into U.S. Dollars. In accordance with U.S. GAAP, we have removed the effect of foreign currency throughout our cash flow statement, except for its effect on our cash and cash equivalents. |
Net cash provided by operating activities decreased by $4.5 million during the three months ended June 27, 2015, as compared to the three months ended June 28, 2014. Cash provided by operating activities decreased primarily due to a reduction of expenses associated with our VCC initiatives, offset by increased annual bonus payments during the three months ended June 27, 2015.
Net cash used in investing activities decreased by $9.9 million during the three months ended June 27, 2015, as compared to the three months ended June 28, 2014. The decrease in cash used in investing activities was the result of a reduction in capital expenditures in the first quarter of fiscal 2016 related to manufacturing operations under construction in Malaysia and Tijuana, which have been substantially completed. During the three months ended June 28, 2014, cash used in investing activities included significant costs related to plant construction activities in Malaysia and Tijuana and the purchase of two previously leased facilities, our manufacturing facility in Salt Lake City and an administrative office at our corporate headquarters in Braintree, Massachusetts.
Net cash used in financing activities increased by $1.0 million during the three months ended June 27, 2015, as compared to the three months ended June 28, 2014. This was primarily due to $39.0 million of cash used to repurchase shares, as discussed above, compared to the $26.5 million used for repurchase during the three months ended June 28, 2014. This was offset by lower term loan repayments during the three months ended June 27, 2015 due to our debt restructuring and an increase in short-term loans.
Concentration of Credit Risk
Concentrations of credit risk with respect to trade accounts receivable are generally limited due to our large number of customers and their diversity across many geographic areas. A portion of our trade accounts receivable outside the United States, however, include sales to government-owned or supported healthcare systems in several countries, which are subject to payment delays and local economic conditions. Payment is dependent upon the financial stability and creditworthiness of those countries' national economies.
We have not incurred significant losses on receivables. We continually evaluate all receivables for potential collection risks associated with the availability of government funding and reimbursement practices. If the financial condition of customers or the countries' healthcare systems deteriorate such that their ability to make payments is uncertain, allowances may be required in future periods.
Inflation
We do not believe that inflation had a significant impact on our results of operations for the periods presented. Historically, we believe we have been able to mitigate the effects of inflation by improving our manufacturing and purchasing efficiencies, by increasing employee productivity, and by adjusting the selling prices of products. We continue to monitor inflation pressures generally and raw materials indices that may affect our procurement and production costs. Increases in the price of petroleum derivatives could result in corresponding increases in our costs to procure plastic raw materials.
Foreign Exchange
During the three months ended June 27, 2015, approximately 43.4% of our sales were generated outside the U.S., generally in foreign currencies, yet our reporting currency is the U.S. Dollar. We also incur certain manufacturing, marketing and selling costs in international markets in local currency. Our primary foreign currency exposures relate to sales denominated in Euro, Japanese Yen, Chinese Yuan and Australian Dollars. We also have foreign currency exposure related to manufacturing and other operational costs denominated in Swiss Francs, British Pounds, Canadian Dollars, and Mexican Pesos. The Yen, Euro, Yuan and Australian Dollar sales exposure is partially mitigated by costs and expenses for foreign operations and sourcing products denominated in foreign currencies. Since our foreign currency denominated Yen, Euro, Yuan and Australian Dollar sales exceed the foreign currency denominated costs, whenever the U.S. Dollar strengthens relative to the Yen, Euro, Yuan or Australian Dollar, there is an adverse effect on our results of operations and, conversely, whenever the U.S. Dollar weakens relative to the Yen, Euro, Yuan or Australian Dollar, there is a positive effect on our results of operations. For Swiss Francs, British Pounds, Canadian Dollars and Mexican Pesos, our primary cash flows relate to product costs or costs and expenses of local operations. Whenever the U.S. Dollar strengthens relative to these foreign currencies, there is a positive effect on our results of operations. Conversely, whenever the U.S. Dollar weakens relative to these currencies, there is an adverse effect on our results of operations.
We have a program in place that is designed to mitigate our exposure to changes in foreign currency exchange rates. That program includes the use of derivative financial instruments to minimize, for a period of time, the unforeseen impact on our financial results from changes in foreign exchange rates. We utilize forward foreign currency contracts to hedge the anticipated cash flows from transactions denominated in foreign currencies, primarily Japanese Yen and Euro, and to a lesser extent Swiss Francs, British Pounds, Australian Dollars, Canadian Dollars, and Mexican Pesos. This does not eliminate the volatility of foreign exchange rates, but because we generally enter into forward contracts one year out, rates are fixed for a one-year period, thereby facilitating financial planning and resource allocation.
These contracts are designated as cash flow hedges. The final impact of currency fluctuations on the results of operations is dependent on the local currency amounts hedged and the actual local currency results.
Presented below are the spot rates for our Euro, Japanese Yen, Australian Dollar, Canadian Dollar, British Pound, Swiss Franc and Mexican Peso cash flow hedges that settled during fiscal years 2014, 2015 and 2016 or are presently outstanding. These hedges cover our long foreign currency positions that result from our sales designated in Euro, Japanese Yen and Australian Dollars. These hedges include our short positions associated with costs incurred in Canadian Dollars, British Pounds, Swiss Francs and Mexican Pesos. The table shows how the strengthening or weakening of the spot rates associated with those hedge contracts versus the spot rates in the contracts that settled in the prior comparable period affects our results favorably or unfavorably. The table assumes a consistent notional amount for hedge contracts in each period presented.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| First Quarter | | Favorable / (Unfavorable) | | Second Quarter | | Favorable / (Unfavorable) | | Third Quarter | | Favorable / (Unfavorable) | | Fourth Quarter | | Favorable / (Unfavorable) |
Sales Hedges | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Euro - Hedge Spot Rate (USD per Euro) | | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
|
FY14 | 1.27 |
| | (11 | )% | | 1.25 |
| | (12 | )% | | 1.29 |
| | (5 | )% | | 1.33 |
| | 1 | % |
FY15 | 1.33 |
| | 5 | % | | 1.35 |
| | 8 | % | | 1.35 |
| | 5 | % | | 1.37 |
| | 3 | % |
FY16 | 1.35 |
| | 2 | % | | 1.29 |
| | (4 | )% | | 1.25 |
| | (7 | )% | | 1.13 |
| | (18 | )% |
FY17 | 1.09 |
| | (19 | )% | | — |
| | — | % | | — |
| | — | % | | — |
| | — | % |
Japanese Yen - Hedge Spot Rate (JPY per USD) | | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
|
FY14 | 79.85 |
| | (1 | )% | | 79.68 |
| | (4 | )% | | 84.32 |
| | (9 | )% | | 93.92 |
| | (19 | )% |
FY15 | 97.16 |
| | (22 | )% | | 98.18 |
| | (23 | )% | | 101.09 |
| | (20 | )% | | 102.44 |
| | (9 | )% |
FY16 | 102.05 |
| | (5 | )% | | 106.84 |
| | (9 | )% | | 118.46 |
| | (17 | )% | | 117.25 |
| | (14 | )% |
FY17 | 124.07 |
| | (22 | )% | | — |
| | — | % | | — |
| | — | % | | — |
| | — | % |
Australian Dollar - Hedge Spot Rate (USD per AUD) | | | | | | | | | | |
FY14 | — |
| | — | % | | 0.92 |
| | — | % | | 0.91 |
| | — | % | | 0.92 |
| | — | % |
FY15 | 0.90 |
| | — | % | | 0.94 |
| | 2 | % | | 0.94 |
| | 3 | % | | 0.90 |
| | (2 | )% |
FY16 | 0.94 |
| | 4 | % | | 0.91 |
| | (3 | )% | | 0.85 |
| | (10 | )% | | 0.79 |
| | (12 | )% |
FY17 | 0.76 |
| | (19 | )% | | — |
| | — | % | | — |
| | — | % | | — |
| | — | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Operating Hedges | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Canadian Dollar - Hedge Spot Rate (CAD per USD) | | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
|
FY14 | 1.01 |
| | 3 | % | | 1.00 |
| | 1 | % | | 1.00 |
| | (1 | )% | | 1.01 |
| | 1 | % |
FY15 | — |
| | — | % | | — |
| | — | % | | 1.08 |
| | 8 | % | | 1.09 |
| | 8 | % |
FY16 | 1.13 |
| | — | % | | 1.14 |
| | — | % | | 1.17 |
| | 8 | % | | 1.25 |
| | 15 | % |
FY17 | 1.24 |
| | 10 | % | | — |
| | — | % | | — |
| | — | % | | — |
| | — | % |
British Pound - Hedge Spot Rate (USD per GBP) | | |
| | |
| | | | |
| | |
|
FY14 | 1.59 |
| | 2 | % | | 1.55 |
| | 5 | % | | 1.52 |
| | 5 | % | | 1.54 |
| | 2 | % |
FY15 | 1.56 |
| | 2 | % | | 1.57 |
| | (1 | )% | | 1.62 |
| | (7 | )% | | 1.65 |
| | (7 | )% |
FY16 | 1.64 |
| | (5 | )% | | 1.57 |
| | — | % | | 1.57 |
| | 3 | % | | 1.53 |
| | 7 | % |
FY17 | 1.55 |
| | 5 | % | | — |
| | — | % | | — |
| | — | % | | — |
| | — | % |
Swiss Franc - Hedge Spot Rate (CHF per USD) | | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
|
FY14 | 0.96 |
| | 17 | % | | 0.95 |
| | 12 | % | | 0.92 |
| | — | % | | 0.93 |
| | 1 | % |
FY15 | 0.94 |
| | (2 | )% | | 0.92 |
| | (3 | )% | | 0.90 |
| | (2 | )% | | 0.89 |
| | (4 | )% |
FY16 | 0.90 |
| | (4 | )% | | 0.95 |
| | 3 | % | | 0.94 |
| | 4 | % | | 0.92 |
| | 3 | % |
FY17 | 0.93 |
| | 3 | % | | — |
| | — | % | | — |
| | — | % | | — |
| | — | % |
Mexican Peso - Hedge Spot Rate (MXN per USD) | | | | | | | | |
FY14 | 12.34 |
| | — | % | | 12.35 |
| | — | % | | 12.22 |
| | — | % | | 12.20 |
| | — | % |
FY15 | 12.40 |
| | — | % | | 13.06 |
| | 6 | % | | 13.09 |
| | 7 | % | | 13.08 |
| | 7 | % |
FY16 | 13.10 |
| | 6 | % | | 13.07 |
| | — | % | | 13.63 |
| | 4 | % | | 14.46 |
| | 11 | % |
FY17 | 15.20 |
| | 16 | % | | 15.45 |
| | 18 | % | | — |
| | — | % | | — |
| | — | % |
We generally place our cash flow hedge contracts on a rolling twelve month basis.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
Information regarding recent accounting pronouncements is included in Note 2, Recent Accounting Pronouncements to our unaudited consolidated financial statements contained in Item 1 of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Information
Statements contained in this report, as well as oral statements we make which are prefaced with the words “may,” “will,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “continue,” “estimate,” “project,” “intend,” “designed,” and similar expressions, are intended to identify forward looking statements regarding events, conditions, and financial trends that may affect our future plans of operations, business strategy, results of operations, and financial position. These statements are based on our current expectations and estimates as to prospective events and circumstances about which we can give no firm assurance. Further, any forward-looking statement speaks only as of the date on which such statement is made, and we undertake no obligation to update any forward-looking statement to reflect events or circumstances after the date on which such statement is made. As it is not possible to predict every new factor that may emerge, forward-looking statements should not be relied upon as a prediction of our actual future financial condition or results. These forward-looking statements, like any forward-looking statements, involve risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those projected or anticipated, including: the effects of disruption from the manufacturing transformation making it more difficult to maintain relationships with employees and timely deliver high quality products, unexpected expenses incurred during our VCC initiatives, technological advances in the medical field and standards for transfusion medicine, our ability to successfully implement products that incorporate such advances and standards, demand for whole blood and blood components, product quality, market acceptance, regulatory uncertainties, the ability of our contract manufacturing vendors to timely supply high quality goods, the effect of economic and political conditions, the impact of competitive products and pricing, blood product reimbursement policies and practices, foreign currency exchange rates, changes in customers’ ordering patterns including single-source tenders, the effect of industry consolidation as seen in the plasma and blood center markets, the effect of communicable diseases and the effect of uncertainties in markets outside the U.S. (including Europe and Asia) in which we operate and such other risks described under Item 1A. Risk Factors included in this report. The foregoing list should not be construed as exhaustive.
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Our exposure relative to market risk is due to foreign exchange risk and interest rate risk.
Foreign Exchange Risk
See the section entitled Foreign Exchange for a discussion of how foreign currency affects our business. It is our policy to mitigate, for a period of time, the unforeseen impact on our financial results of fluctuations in foreign exchange rates by using derivative financial instruments known as forward contracts to hedge anticipated cash flows from forecasted foreign currency denominated sales and expenses. We do not use the financial instruments for speculative purposes. We estimate the change in the fair value of all forward contracts assuming both a 10% strengthening and weakening of the U.S. Dollar relative to all other major currencies. In the event of a 10% strengthening of the U.S. Dollar, the change in fair value of all forward contracts would result in a $6.5 million increase in the fair value of the forward contracts; whereas a 10% weakening of the U.S. Dollar would result in a $6.5 million decrease in the fair value of the forward contracts.
Interest Rate Risk
Our exposure to changes in interest rates is associated with borrowings on our credit facility, all of which is variable rate debt. All other long-term debt is at fixed rates. Total outstanding debt under our credit facility as of June 27, 2015 was $429.4 million with an interest rate of 1.563% based on prevailing LIBOR rates. An increase of 100 basis points in LIBOR rates would result in additional annual interest expense of $4.3 million. On December 21, 2012, we entered into interest rate swap agreements to effectively convert $250.0 million of borrowings from a variable rate to a fixed rate. The interest rate swaps qualify for hedge accounting treatment as cash flow hedges. The major risks from interest rate swaps include changes in the interest rates affecting the fair value of such instruments, potential increases in interest expense due to market increases in floating interest rates and the creditworthiness of the counterparties in such transactions. We continuously monitor the creditworthiness of our counterparties.
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
We conducted an evaluation, as of June 27, 2015, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer (the Company’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer, respectively) regarding the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as defined in Rule 13a-15 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”). Based upon that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective as of June 27, 2015. There has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended June 27, 2015 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
PART II — OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
Italian Employment Litigation
Our Italian manufacturing subsidiary is party to several actions initiated by employees of the facility in Ascoli-Piceno, Italy where we have ceased manufacturing operations. These include actions claiming (i) working conditions and minimum salaries should have been established by either a different classification under their national collective bargaining agreement or a different agreement altogether, (ii) certain solidarity agreements, which are arrangements between the Company, employees and the government to continue full pay and benefits for employees who would otherwise be terminated in times of low demand, are void, and (iii) payment of the extra time used for changing into and out of the working clothes at the beginning and end of each shift.
In addition, a union represented in the Ascoli plant has filed an action claiming that the Company discriminated against it in favor of three other represented unions by (i) interfering with an employee referendum, (ii) interfering with an employee petition to recall union representatives from office, and (iii) excluding the union from certain meetings.
Finally, we have been added as defendants on claims filed against Pall Corporation prior to our acquisition of the plant in August 2012. These claims relate to agreements to "freeze" benefit allowances for a certain period in exchange for Pall's commitments on hiring and plant investment.
As of June 27, 2015, the total amount of damages claimed by the plaintiffs in these matters is approximately $3.7 million. It is not possible at this point in the proceedings to accurately evaluate the likelihood or amount of any potential losses and therefore no amounts have been accrued. We may receive other, similar claims in the future.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
In addition to the other information set forth in this report, careful consideration should be given to the factors discussed in Part 1, “Item 1A. Risk Factors” in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 28, 2015, which could materially affect the Company's business, financial condition or future results.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
(c) Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
In the April 28, 2014 press release, the Company announced that its Board of Directors approved the repurchase of up to $100.0 million worth of Company shares, subject to compliance with its loan covenants. Through June 27, 2015, the Company repurchased 2,158,817 shares of its common stock for an aggregate purchase price of $79.9 million. We reflect stock repurchases in our financial statements on a “trade date” basis and as Authorized Unissued (Haemonetics is a Massachusetts company and under Massachusetts law repurchased shares are treated as authorized but unissued).
All of the purchases during the year were made under the publicly announced program and were made in the open market.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Period | | Total Number of Shares Repurchased | | Average Price Paid per Share including Commissions | | Total Dollar Value of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs | | Maximum Dollar Value of Shares that May Yet be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs |
March 30, 2014 - April 26, 2014 | | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 100,000,000 |
|
April 27, 2014 - May 24, 2014 | | 694,162 |
| | $ | 31.81 |
| | $ | 22,079,008 |
| | $ | 77,920,992 |
|
May 25, 2014 - June 28, 2014 | | 139,595 |
| | $ | 34.23 |
| | $ | 4,778,988 |
| | $ | 73,142,004 |
|
June 29, 2014 - July 26, 2014 | | 75,185 |
| | $ | 35.49 |
| | $ | 2,668,606 |
| | $ | 70,473,398 |
|
July 27, 2014 - August 23, 2014 | | 63,730 |
| | $ | 36.12 |
| | $ | 2,302,197 |
| | $ | 68,171,201 |
|
August 24, 2014 - September 27, 2014 | | 62,144 |
| | $ | 35.55 |
| | $ | 2,209,060 |
| | $ | 65,962,141 |
|
September 28, 2014 - October 25, 2014 | | 66,089 |
| | $ | 35.04 |
| | $ | 2,316,065 |
| | $ | 63,646,076 |
|
October 26, 2014 - November 22, 2014 | | 45,129 |
| | $ | 36.48 |
| | $ | 1,646,262 |
| | $ | 61,999,814 |
|
November 23, 2014 - December 27, 2014 | | 19,055 |
| | $ | 36.76 |
| | $ | 700,422 |
| | $ | 61,299,392 |
|
December 28, 2014 - January 24, 2015 | | 6,877 |
| | $ | 36.93 |
| | $ | 253,942 |
| | $ | 61,045,450 |
|
January 25, 2015 - February 21, 2015 | | 2,145 |
| | $ | 36.92 |
| | $ | 79,194 |
| | $ | 60,966,256 |
|
February 22, 2015 - March 28, 2015 | | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 60,966,256 |
|
March 29, 2015 - April 25, 2015 | | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 60,966,256 |
|
April 26, 2015 - May 23, 2015 | | 596,987 |
| | $ | 41.09 |
| | $ | 24,528,763 |
| | $ | 36,437,493 |
|
May 24, 2015 - June 27, 2015 | | 387,719 |
| | $ | 42.23 |
| | $ | 16,372,940 |
| | $ | 20,064,553 |
|
Total | | 2,158,817 |
| | $ | 37.03 |
| | $ | 79,935,447 |
| | |
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
Not applicable.
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures
Not applicable.
Item 5. [Removed and Reserved]
Item 6. Exhibits
|
| | |
31.1 | | Certification pursuant to Section 302 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, of Brian Concannon, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company |
| | |
31.2 | | Certification pursuant to Section 302 of Sarbanes-Oxley of 2002, of Christopher Lindop, Chief Financial Officer and Executive Vice President Business Development of the Company |
| | |
32.1 | | Certification Pursuant to 18 United States Code Section 1350, as adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, of Brian Concannon, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company |
| | |
32.2 | | Certification Pursuant to 18 United States Code Section 1350, as adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, of Christopher Lindop, Chief Financial Officer and Executive Vice President Business Development of the Company |
| | |
101* | | The following materials from Haemonetics Corporation on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 27, 2015, formatted in Extensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL); (i) Consolidated Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income, (ii) Consolidated Balance Sheets, (iii) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, and (iv) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. |
_____________________________
|
| | |
* | | In accordance with Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, the XBRL-related information in Exhibit 101 to this Form 10-Q is deemed not filed or part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act, is deemed not filed for the purposes of section 18 of the Exchange Act, and otherwise is not subject to liability under these sections. |
† | | Agreement, plan, or arrangement related to the compensation of officers or directors |
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
| | | |
| HAEMONETICS CORPORATION | |
7/30/2015 | By: | /s/ Brian Concannon | |
| | Brian Concannon, President and Chief Executive Officer | |
| | (Principal Executive Officer) | |
| | | |
7/30/2015 | By: | /s/ Christopher Lindop | |
| | Christopher Lindop, Chief Financial Officer and Executive Vice President Business Development | |
| | (Principal Financial Officer) | |
HAE Q1, Jun 2016 Ex 31.1
EXHIBIT 31.1
CERTIFICATION
I, Brian Concannon, certify that:
| |
1. | I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Haemonetics Corporation; |
| |
2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; |
| |
3. | Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; |
| |
4. | The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: |
| |
a) | Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; |
| |
b) | Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; |
| |
c) | Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and |
| |
d) | Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and |
| |
5. | The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): |
| |
a) | All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and |
| |
b) | Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. |
7/30/2015
|
| | | | |
| /s/ Brian Concannon | |
| Brian Concannon, President and Chief Executive | |
| Officer (Principal Executive Officer) | |
HAE Q1, Jun 2016 Ex 31.2
EXHIBIT 31.2
CERTIFICATION
I, Christopher Lindop, certify that:
| |
1. | I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Haemonetics Corporation; |
| |
2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; |
| |
3. | Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; |
| |
4. | The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: |
| |
a) | Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; |
| |
b) | Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; |
| |
c) | Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and |
| |
d) | Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and |
| |
5. | The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): |
| |
a) | All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and |
| |
b) | Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. |
7/30/2015 |
| | | | |
| /s/ Christopher Lindop | |
| Christopher Lindop, Chief Financial Officer and | |
| Executive Vice President Business Development (Principal Financial Officer) | |
HAE Q1, Jun 2016 Ex 32.1
EXHIBIT 32.1
Certification Pursuant To
18 USC. Section 1350,
As Adopted Pursuant To
Section 906 of the Sarbanes/Oxley Act of 2002
In connection with the Quarterly Report of Haemonetics Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 27, 2015 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Brian Concannon, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, that this Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
7/30/2015
|
| | | | |
| /s/ Brian Concannon | |
| Brian Concannon, | |
| President and Chief Executive Officer | |
A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Haemonetics and will be retained by Haemonetics and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
HAE Q1, Jun 2016 Ex 32.2
EXHIBIT 32.2
Certification Pursuant To
18 USC. Section 1350,
As Adopted Pursuant To
Section 906 of the Sarbanes/Oxley Act of 2002
In connection with the Quarterly Report of Haemonetics Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 27, 2015 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Christopher Lindop, Chief Financial Officer and Executive Vice President Business Development of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, that this Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
7/30/2015
|
| | | | |
| /s/ Christopher Lindop | |
| Christopher Lindop, | |
| Chief Financial Officer and Executive Vice President Business Development | |
A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Haemonetics and will be retained by Haemonetics and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.